i suspect UM will get some #1 votes, but that duke will be back at 1 this week followed by UT and then UM.
i suspect UM will get some #1 votes, but that duke will be back at 1 this week followed by UT and then UM.
Ask Della. She has followed basketball for two years now, so she can tell you.Probably but why is UT 2nd?
Probably but why is UT 2nd?
aren't they currently 3rd? i think with UM, folks are still waiting them out. on the other hand, tennessee has been top 5 since the preseason.
Dukes resume is better than Michigan and UVA. Is that even a debate at this point? I think Michigan's good for sure and I enjoy watching them play. However what are you going on other than opinion that Michigan deserves to be #1? Is it the same thing the voters for the polls go on? The eye test? If it is, like your post up there suggests.....pot meet kettle...The folks who vote. Most have deeply held biases. I agree with Hail. I don't know why Virginia or Michigan should not be a combination of either 1 or 2. Michigan beat the stuffings out of Nova and the TarHeels. Why should they not be number 1?
It was political that UK started the season at 2. It was political that Duke moved up to the top after beating one team. It was not voted on facts just biases. Of course in basketball championships are not determined by the polls, thank goodness.
In the old days before we had a football playoff the Big 10 had a far better chance to win the mythical championship than say a team from the SEC. (Since the playoff started Ohio State is the only one that has punched the ticket.) The Big 10 states had big populations and a large number of votes in the poles. Plus, Notre Dame can't win a championship on the field on before the playoffs, but they always get undeserved votes in the polls.
The polls are polls; a collection of biases and little knowledge. I will bet that I watch more basketball than just about any of the pollsters.
Dukes resume is better than Michigan and UVA. Is that even a debate at this point? I think Michigan's good for sure and I enjoy watching them play. However what are you going on other than opinion that Michigan deserves to be #1? Is it the same thing the voters for the polls go on? The eye test? If it is, like your post up there suggests.....pot meet kettle...
UVA, eh. They are good but are you really saying they should be ranked ahead of Duke?
Dukes resume is better than Michigan and UVA. Is that even a debate at this point? I think Michigan's good for sure and I enjoy watching them play. However what are you going on other than opinion that Michigan deserves to be #1? Is it the same thing the voters for the polls go on? The eye test? If it is, like your post up there suggests.....pot meet kettle...
UVA, eh. They are good but are you really saying they should be ranked ahead of Duke?
Dukes resume is better than Michigan and UVA. Is that even a debate at this point? I think Michigan's good for sure and I enjoy watching them play. However what are you going on other than opinion that Michigan deserves to be #1? Is it the same thing the voters for the polls go on? The eye test? If it is, like your post up there suggests.....pot meet kettle...
UVA, eh. They are good but are you really saying they should be ranked ahead of Duke?
I don’t think UVA should be ranked ahead of Duke but I also feel very confident in saying that, if we had your resume and you had ours, you’d be ranked ahead of us. A 1-loss UVA will never be ranked ahead of an undefeated Duke regardless of resume
I don't know that Duke's resume is any better than Michigan's at all. UVA has not played the quality of teams that Michigan has so I will leave that up to you. So, yes, it is a debate to suggest that Michigan is good enough to be ranked number 1............ I am not very bright but I am stupid enough to debate it.
I am going on the eye test, pure and simple. Now, if I had a vote I would watch more games and check more stats; because in life I have excelled by doing my damned home work. The dipwads voting in the polls don't apparently even watch the games or do their homework. They watch SportsCenter and go with the flow.
Let me know when Duke beats UNC worse than Michigan did. We all know that Duke will not beat any team this year worse than they did poor old number 2 Kentucky. I give Duke their due but Michigan has really looked good.
I would like to know why in hell you feel that Duke should be ranked ahead of Michigan.
Please God let Michigan be ranked ahead of Tenn. This guy belongs on RaftersRollLaugh
The constant repeating your opinions over, and over and over and overWhat is so outlandish about my opinion?
The constant repeating your opinions over, and over and over and over
No one here can help your cause. I do know Rick Bozich from Louisville, shall I text him?
Yes they are currently 3rd. But I don’t get why. Michigan’s wins are just as impressive (if not more) without having a loss.
Started in the Top 5...This time of year, where you started plays a huge role. IU beat Marquette by 23. Yet MU is ranked higher.Probably but why is UT 2nd?
They shouldn't be, they're not that good. They beat gonzaga who has been struggling since their super bowl victory where they shot over 70% in the first half and have been riding that ever since. They don't pass the eye test imo, they're ok but nothing special.Probably but why is UT 2nd?
I agree, Michigan should at the least be #2 right now. I think the UNC victory was inflated a bit by Roy sitting his good players and letting the score get out of control to prove a point but Michigan would still have won that game by 10+. Tennessee does not pass the eye test, 1 big victory aside (even though that same team got blown out by UNC a week later and struggled to beat Washington right before).Duke’s top 50 wins:
#11 neutral by 11
#13 neutral by 6
#15 neutral by 34
#22 home by 21
Dukes losses:
#3 neutral by 2
Michigan’s top 50 wins:
#7 home by 17
#18 away by 27
#19 home by 19
#45 away by 2
Michigan’s losses:
None
Tennessee’s top 50 wins:
#3 neutral by 3
#38 neutral by 9
Tennessee’s losses:
#5 neutral by 6
No one on this forum should be able to look at that and say the gap between Michigan/duke resumes is bigger than the gap between Tennessee/Michigan resumes.
Michigan crack your top 25 yet?
If it's merit-based, I'd say:
1. Michigan
2. Kansas
3. Tennessee
4. Gonzaga
5. Duke
6. Virginia
7. Nevada
8. Auburn
9. Texas Tech
10. Michigan State
If it's based on the eye-test, I'd go with:
1. Michigan
2. Duke
3. Gonzaga (still missing 2 of their top 7 players)
4. Tennessee
5. Kansas
6. Virginia
7. Michigan State
8. Auburn
9. North Carolina
10. Nevada
Please tell me you aren't arguing Notre Dame got undeserved votes this year.The folks who vote. Most have deeply held biases. I agree with Hail. I don't know why Virginia or Michigan should not be a combination of either 1 or 2. Michigan beat the stuffings out of Nova and the TarHeels. Why should they not be number 1?
It was political that UK started the season at 2. It was political that Duke moved up to the top after beating one team. It was not voted on facts just biases. Of course in basketball championships are not determined by the polls, thank goodness.
In the old days before we had a football playoff the Big 10 had a far better chance to win the mythical championship than say a team from the SEC. (Since the playoff started Ohio State is the only one that has punched the ticket.) The Big 10 states had big populations and a large number of votes in the poles. Plus, Notre Dame can't win a championship on the field on before the playoffs, but they always get undeserved votes in the polls.
The polls are polls; a collection of biases and little knowledge. I will bet that I watch more basketball than just about any of the pollsters.
That is easy Bert. Since UT is a perennial basketball powerhouse the AP voters eyes glaze over.Ask Della. She has followed basketball for two years now, so she can tell you.
If you're going to make a case (and I think you have a good one) at least be honest. UT beat #1 on a neutral and lost to #1 on a neutral.Duke’s top 50 wins:
#11 neutral by 11
#13 neutral by 6
#15 neutral by 34
#22 home by 21
Dukes losses:
#3 neutral by 2
Michigan’s top 50 wins:
#7 home by 17
#18 away by 27
#19 home by 19
#45 away by 2
Michigan’s losses:
None
Tennessee’s top 50 wins:
#3 neutral by 3
#38 neutral by 9
Tennessee’s losses:
#5 neutral by 6
No one on this forum should be able to look at that and say the gap between Michigan/duke resumes is bigger than the gap between Tennessee/Michigan resumes.
I disagree but this all speculation anyway, so keep that confidence.I don’t think UVA should be ranked ahead of Duke but I also feel very confident in saying that, if we had your resume and you had ours, you’d be ranked ahead of us. A 1-loss UVA will never be ranked ahead of an undefeated Duke regardless of resume
If you're going to make a case (and I think you have a good one) at least be honest. UT beat #1 on a neutral and lost to #1 on a neutral.
If you're going to make a case (and I think you have a good one) at least be honest. UT beat #1 on a neutral and lost to #1 on a neutral.
When measuring Top 50 wins, it's not based on the teams AP ranking at the time of the game. It's those teams' current ranking based on whatever metric you're using, NET/Kenpom/RPI.
Again Bert, those "dipwads" also vote on the eye test. Why is it that you have the superiority over their opinions?I don't know that Duke's resume is any better than Michigan's at all. UVA has not played the quality of teams that Michigan has so I will leave that up to you. So, yes, it is a debate to suggest that Michigan is good enough to be ranked number 1............ I am not very bright but I am stupid enough to debate it.
I am going on the eye test, pure and simple. Now, if I had a vote I would watch more games and check more stats; because in life I have excelled by doing my damned home work. The dipwads voting in the polls don't apparently even watch the games or do their homework. They watch SportsCenter and go with the flow.
Let me know when Duke beats UNC worse than Michigan did. We all know that Duke will not beat any team this year worse than they did poor old number 2 Kentucky. I give Duke their due but Michigan has really looked good.
I would like to know why in hell you feel that Duke should be ranked ahead of Michigan.
True, but UNC's loss to UK would devalue the UM win too.I’m going by their current kenpom rankings. Kansas just lost to Arizona State and won’t be #1 anymore.
Tell us how Nevada has earned such lofty levels with their schedule?I'll just put this right here:
"There are a few candidates for No. 1, Duke, Michigan and Tennessee chief among them.
Duke and Tennessee each have one loss, with Duke's to Gonzaga and Tennessee's to Kansas. Duke, however, has defeated Texas Tech, Auburn, Kentucky and Indiana, while Tennessee's best wins are over Gonzaga and Louisville. The Blue Devils have the clear edge over the Volunteers in that category, and that's before factoring in Duke's terrific schedule-adjusted efficiency numbers.
Michigan, of course, remains one of five unbeatens in the country, and the Wolverines are the best of that lot. They have an elite defense, along with wins over North Carolina, Villanova and Purdue. Duke gets a slight edge over the Wolverines, too. Duke also gets the nod over unbeatens Virginia and Nevada, as well as one-loss Kansas.
Simply put, Duke has been the most dominant team in college basketball so far this season -- and the Blue Devils have the quality wins to back up that assertion. They aren't without flaws, and Texas Tech might have provided the formula to the ACC on how to slow them down, but as we head into conference play, Duke will sit at No. 1."
http://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/story/_/id/25379665/college-basketball-power-rankings
Tell us how Nevada has earned such lofty levels with their schedule?
How do you feel about that? IU moved down to 23, which I agree with that ranking but there is no way we should be behind Houston. They’ve barely scraped by against multiple unbanked teams like Saint Louis by 5, Rio Grande by 5, Utah State by 10, LSU by around 6, yet they are still 22. A team least the committee puts emphasis on the net, where IU is a little higher.Michigan #2
I do think we are getting no love...Beat #18 Marquette like a drum(96-73). Have wins over Butler and Louisville. I don't see how we drop...Or fall behind Houston; who's beaten a bunch of cup cakes; sans LSU. Is what it is. I do think we are a TOp 20 team, with tons of room for improvement.How do you feel about that? IU moved down to 23, which I agree with that ranking but there is no way we should be behind Houston. They’ve barely scraped by against multiple unbanked teams like Saint Louis by 5, Rio Grande by 5, Utah State by 10, LSU by around 6, yet they are still 22. A team least the committee puts emphasis on the net, where IU is a little higher.