Villanova and Michigan are blue bloods?

[hailtoyourvictor]

Minus the PAC 12 all the power 5 conferences can stake a claim.

I think the ACC was the best, despite not having a chance to win a title.

 

[AWilli6995]

I think the ACC was the best, despite not having a chance to win a title.

I don’t. Thought the Big 12 and the Big 10 were better. UVA dominated the regular season and won the conference tournament. The rest of us was fighting for 2-4 place.

 

[Harry Hondo]

http://www.espn.com/mens-college-ba...make-interesting-hard-believe-2018-final-four

Wut

No. They’ve each won 1 national title in the almost 80 year history of the NCAA. I think you need at least 4. Loyola must be one, then.

 

[jimmysfly]

And Maryland didn’t win one as a Big 10 member. Other than that I can see your argument.

I already made that point, previous post: actual vs. current membership.

Try actually reading the thread history before posting.

 

[AWilli6995]

I already made that point, previous post: actual vs. current membership.

Try actually reading the thread history before posting.

You mentioned Maryland first and I don't know why. I mentioned NC State because you were wrong in your count. If you're going to post do some history on who actually won titles. Again you do have a point but if you wanna continue to pimp your conference they need to win some titles.

 

[Ameoba Offense]

Villanova has the look of late 80's/early 90's Duke to me right now. Wright is a little older than K was at that time but another 5-10 years at or near the level they've been for the past 5 or so and they'll kick the door in like Duke did. That title in '85 and a couple FF's before that give them the requisite early time stamp to be eligible.