ADVERTISEMENT

Top ten for next season

Eh, it’s not even close to the same team next year so not sure what that has to do with it.

These are all just opinions, we can talk again next year at this time.

Yeah but we’ve seen that story plenty of times. It’s easier said than done to just bring in a bunch of newcomers and have them all gel perfectly to be a top 5-10 team. Just ask UK and Duke.
 
  • Like
Reactions: olsonab
Yeah but we’ve seen that story plenty of times. It’s easier said than done to just bring in a bunch of newcomers and have them all gel perfectly to be a top 5-10 team. Just ask UK and Duke.

Agreed. The pieces are certainly there now and we have a coach with a proven record of developing players and getting the most out of them, but ultimately time will tell. A lot can happen with injuries, transfers, team cohesiveness etc between now and then.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GE Nole
I’ve heard Shakas been holding back the past few years, and now he finally has all the pieces he wants to make a run at the title this year.
 
Michigan still top 10, quiet on our roster front. Transfer market hasn’t affected us yet. Will at some point though, probably next year.
 
John Watson gave Duke a crystal ball pick in the latest Patrick Baldwin sweepstakes. I tend to think Milwaukee is still the favorite. If we're able to land Baldwin, I'm straight deucing myself. Would make us the mot talented team in the country, by far, with Baldwin on the team.
 
John Watson gave Duke a crystal ball pick in the latest Patrick Baldwin sweepstakes. I tend to think Milwaukee is still the favorite. If we're able to land Baldwin, I'm straight deucing myself. Would make us the mot talented team in the country, by far, with Baldwin on the team.

2019 all over again....will be interesting to see how K blows this one
 
  • Like
Reactions: dukedevilz
Isaiah Jackson isn’t coming back, how long have you been watching Calipari teams?
Guaranteed 1st Round picks don’t come back to college 95% of the time.

The rest of the roster looks like a top 25 squad but not anywhere close to a title contender.

Once again, Swaggy Cal has failed to land a superstar OAD.

Collins and Hickman will follow the typical path of being inconsistent and sometimes great throughout the season that most 5 stars follow.

They aren’t Wall/Boogie or Fox/Bam.
Actually that Jonathon Givony dude said Collins wasn’t that far off from Chet who is the number 1 recruit. He’s lottery pick good.
 
2019 all over again....will be interesting to see how K blows this one

He'll probably announce this is his last season, and he'll have a season long kiss-my-ass tour, which will ultimately distract from the team. I do find it interesting/concerning that K hasn't extended a single scholarship offer to anyone in the 2022 class.

Not completely sold that Baldwin is coming here, but Duke's incoming recruits are certainly recruiting him hard.
 
He'll probably announce this is his last season, and he'll have a season long kiss-my-ass tour, which will ultimately distract from the team. I do find it interesting/concerning that K hasn't extended a single scholarship offer to anyone in the 2022 class.

Not completely sold that Baldwin is coming here, but Duke's incoming recruits are certainly recruiting him hard.

How are any of them going to get their stats up with Mark Williams scoring 25 a game?
 
How are any of them going to get their stats up with Mark Williams scoring 25 a gam

It's all good. If we happen to hold back one or two of these guys, they can always come back the following season. I mean, they should be fine. They're already set for life.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sgrooms
He'll probably announce this is his last season, and he'll have a season long kiss-my-ass tour, which will ultimately distract from the team. I do find it interesting/concerning that K hasn't extended a single scholarship offer to anyone in the 2022 class.

Not completely sold that Baldwin is coming here, but Duke's incoming recruits are certainly recruiting him hard.
The upside of a kiss my ass tour is that you have to believe the refs will take a tire iron to whoever’s knees needed to secure K a championship send off.
 
John Watson gave Duke a crystal ball pick in the latest Patrick Baldwin sweepstakes. I tend to think Milwaukee is still the favorite. If we're able to land Baldwin, I'm straight deucing myself. Would make us the mot talented team in the country, by far, with Baldwin on the team.
By far? Over Gonzaga? Michigan? Not sure about that
 
  • Like
Reactions: RichardMassive
By far? Over Gonzaga? Michigan? Not sure about that

Not saying we'd have the best team. Just think we'd have the most talent. If we get Baldwin, there's a very real chance that we'll have 4 lottery picks. Keels and Moore might have decent shots at squeezing into the latter part of the 1st round, too. I think Gonzaga and Michigan could reasonably have 2-3 first rounders.

You could say Duke didn't have the best team in 2019, but probably had the most talent. Same might be true in 2022. Obviously this is all contingent upon Baldwin committing to Duke.
 
Last edited:
Not saying we'd have the best team. Just think we'd have the most talent. If we get Baldwin, there's a very real chance that we'll have 4 lottery picks. Keels and Moore might have decent shots at squeezing into the latter part of the 1st round, too. I think Gonzaga and Michigan could reasonably have 2-3 first rounders.

You could say Duke didn't have the best team in 2019, but probably had the most talent. Same might be true in 2022. Obviously this is all contingent upon Baldwin committing to Duke.

What’s up with judging talent by NBA upside? Luka Garza was one of the most talented players in the country. Franz Wagner isn’t a more talented college player just because he fits the NBA model better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RichardMassive
What’s up with judging talent by NBA upside? Luka Garza was one of the most talented players in the country. Franz Wagner isn’t a more talented college player just because he fits the NBA model better.

This is true. But, it's hard to quantify talent on the aggregate, especially when there are a few unknown variables. The freshmen are somewhat unknown variables; no one really knows how impactful they'll be until we see them share the court with 9 other D1 players (i.e. Hunter Dickinson, or perhaps a few years ago with Trae Young). And even then, the beginning of the season often doesn't mirror the end of the season. Brandon Ingram averaged less than 11 ppg in his first 7 games; averaged around 19 a game in his final 29 contests. Kentucky is another example; they've had several young teams that really turned it on late (2011 & 2014).

So, even with Baldwin, it's hard for me to really say how good this Duke team could be. Our floor might only be in the 6-15 range. With his presence, it's hard for me to believe anyone has a higher ceiling. Can't remember who it was, but I recall a prominent college basketball pundit a few years back that mentioned you should never pick a team to win it all if they don't have NBA talent on the roster. I think he said he always made sure he picked a team that had at least 2 first rounders. That seemed like a reasonable claim - and I think there's some correlation to that.
 
Not saying we'd have the best team. Just think we'd have the most talent. If we get Baldwin, there's a very real chance that we'll have 4 lottery picks. Keels and Moore might have decent shots at squeezing into the latter part of the 1st round, too. I think Gonzaga and Michigan could reasonably have 2-3 first rounders.

You could say Duke didn't have the best team in 2019, but probably had the most talent. Same might be true in 2022. Obviously this is all contingent upon Baldwin committing to Duke.
We were the best team in 2019 though no? Duke was the #1 Overall Seed and beat eventual national champs UVA twice.

The best team doesn't win in a single elimination format as we've seen countless times.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ceilo77
What’s up with judging talent by NBA upside? Luka Garza was one of the most talented players in the country. Franz Wagner isn’t a more talented college player just because he fits the NBA model better.
You mean Wagner isn't a better player right now than Garza even though he might be more talented?

Talent has to do with a combo of skillset, physical attributes and NBA upside. There's definitely a projection element involved with it. If NBA scouts think that in 5 years, Wagner better fits the mold of a prototypical NBA small forward and can defend that position at a high level, he'll be drafted higher than someone like Garza who projects more as a backup 5 in the NBA.

But lets be clear, the top 5 incoming HS recruits have a track record of being All-American type players generally during their one year in college.

There's always a few experienced guys who've been around in college for a while and bloomed late who are on the same level like Malcolm Brogdon, Josh Hart, Brice Johnson, Denzel Valentine, Luka Garza, etc. etc.
 
We were the best team in 2019 though no? Duke was the #1 Overall Seed and beat eventual national champs UVA twice.

The best team doesn't win in a single elimination format as we've seen countless times.

If you replayed the 2019 tournament 10 times, it's likely you'd end up with 3-6 different winners. I thought we had as a good as shot as anyone. But, we had deficiencies in our game, namely perimeter shooting and half court sets.

I do believe UVA and Duke were the two best teams (If the tournament was played 10 times, Duke/UVA may have combined to win 5 of them). It'd be interesting to see how a third matchup would have played out. In the first contest, Zion and RJ went in complete ISO mode, and it mostly worked well. They had 57 of the 71 points; but we only had 6 assists on 26 made field goals. Ball movement was taken out of the game plan. In the second matchup, UVA really clamped down on defending the interior. Fortunately, we made 13 of our 21 three point attempts. That was quite unexpected. So while we beat UVA twice, it's hard for me to say we'd be overwhelming favorites in a third matchup. Slight favorites, but the game could easily swing either direction.
 
Last edited:
You mean Wagner isn't a better player right now than Garza even though he might be more talented?

Talent has to do with a combo of skillset, physical attributes and NBA upside. There's definitely a projection element involved with it. If NBA scouts think that in 5 years, Wagner better fits the mold of a prototypical NBA small forward and can defend that position at a high level, he'll be drafted higher than someone like Garza who projects more as a backup 5 in the NBA.

But lets be clear, the top 5 incoming HS recruits have a track record of being All-American type players generally during their one year in college.

There's always a few experienced guys who've been around in college for a while and bloomed late who are on the same level like Malcolm Brogdon, Josh Hart, Brice Johnson, Denzel Valentine, Luka Garza, etc. etc.

I don’t think Wagner was a more talented college player than Garza. Garza was the national player of the year for a reason, whether or not his talent projects to NBA or not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MGC_07
I won't lie. I was pretty happy that Duke lost to Michigan State in the Elite 8. And I was pretty happy that Michigan State lost to Texas Tech in the Final Four. Those are two teams that UVA has consistently struggled with. While it would have been extra sweet to beat either of those teams for the natty, I am not as confident in that happening.
 
I won't lie. I was pretty happy that Duke lost to Michigan State in the Elite 8. And I was pretty happy that Michigan State lost to Texas Tech in the Final Four. Those are two teams that UVA has consistently struggled with. While it would have been extra sweet to beat either of those teams for the natty, I am not as confident in that happening.
That Tech game was one of the most painful as a fan for us. Tech is a hell of a defensive team no doubt, but we we’re missing a lot of good looks that we got and we’re hitting all year. 31% from the field and 29% from 3. I really thought we had a shot to win it all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jhmossy
That MSU Elite 8 game was pretty painful from the Duke perspective. So many little things adding up. RJ took over the final 3 possessions of the game, and only managed a single point. WTH we would defer to him over the NPOY 3 consecutive times is beyond me. We had 0 transition points in the entire game. As it was, you guys were +10 in the turnover category. That was huge. The 13-0 run to close the first half was also pretty substantial. We were certainly beatable, as we barely survived UCF and Virginia Tech. Just wish we could have maximized our opportunities a little better.
 
That MSU Elite 8 game was pretty painful from the Duke perspective. So many little things adding up. RJ took over the final 3 possessions of the game, and only managed a single point. WTH we would defer to him over the NPOY 3 consecutive times is beyond me. We had 0 transition points in the entire game. As it was, you guys were +10 in the turnover category. That was huge. The 13-0 run to close the first half was also pretty substantial. We were certainly beatable, as we barely survived UCF and Virginia Tech. Just wish we could have maximized our opportunities a little better.

Y'all should have lost in the second round to UCF. A couple... Interesting foul calls and UCF missing a 2 incher at the buzzer was all she wrote. Duke peaked game one that year and never hit those highs again.
I won't lie. I was pretty happy that Duke lost to Michigan State in the Elite 8. And I was pretty happy that Michigan State lost to Texas Tech in the Final Four. Those are two teams that UVA has consistently struggled with. While it would have been extra sweet to beat either of those teams for the natty, I am not as confident in that happening.

Trashton Hagans shaving points against Auburn saved you. Would have been a better final four game (though seeing auburn fans butt hurt still is funny).
 
That MSU Elite 8 game was pretty painful from the Duke perspective. So many little things adding up. RJ took over the final 3 possessions of the game, and only managed a single point. WTH we would defer to him over the NPOY 3 consecutive times is beyond me. We had 0 transition points in the entire game. As it was, you guys were +10 in the turnover category. That was huge. The 13-0 run to close the first half was also pretty substantial. We were certainly beatable, as we barely survived UCF and Virginia Tech. Just wish we could have maximized our opportunities a little better.
You’re length definitely bothered us, I don’t think anyone besides Tillman shot efficiently, but yeah, us limiting turnovers won us the game. We’re a turnover prone team, and you don’t beat you guys that year by taking the same number of shots as them.

I’m sure a painful memory for you guys, but boy, seeing a guy that walked on for us truly develop into a great player his senior year and send us to the Final Four with a shot over the #1 pick will always be one of my favorite CBB moments.
 
Y'all should have lost in the second round to UCF. A couple... Interesting foul calls and UCF missing a 2 incher at the buzzer was all she wrote. Duke peaked game one that year and never hit those highs again.

You could say there are several interesting foul calls in seemingly every game. Tacko Fall was a force down low. But, he just as easily could have fouled out much, much earlier. He got away with a few fouls, IMO. We were up by 7 points with 7 minutes. The complexion of the game would have been significantly different if he weren't playing down the home stretch.
 
That MSU Elite 8 game was pretty painful from the Duke perspective. So many little things adding up. RJ took over the final 3 possessions of the game, and only managed a single point. WTH we would defer to him over the NPOY 3 consecutive times is beyond me. We had 0 transition points in the entire game. As it was, you guys were +10 in the turnover category. That was huge. The 13-0 run to close the first half was also pretty substantial. We were certainly beatable, as we barely survived UCF and Virginia Tech. Just wish we could have maximized our opportunities a little better.
The second Barrett got fouled and went to the line with a chance to tie I said “game over.” K somehow repeatedly thinking Barrett was a clutch player still haunts me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dukedevilz
The second Barrett got fouled and went to the line with a chance to tie I said “game over.” K somehow repeatedly thinking Barrett was a clutch player still haunts me.

Yep. And we just as easily could have lost to FSU because Barrett missed a free throw in the closing seconds; FSU fumbled the rebound a bit, we got the ball out of bounds, and ended up winning on a Reddish 3-pointer.

I want to say Barrett missed 7 shots in the final minute of the Gonzaga game. Meanwhile, Zion made incredibly clutch plays in the final minute against UNC and UCF. Ball went into the wrong hands against MSU, unfortunately.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WojoRising
Lots of talk about Nolan Hickman committing to Gonzaga. With the likes of Andrew Nembhard, Rasir Bolton, and Hunter Sallis in the backcourt, I don't think Hickman would start. But, Few could sell to him that he's likely to be the primary ballhandler in 2023.
 
Lots of talk about Nolan Hickman committing to Gonzaga. With the likes of Andrew Nembhard, Rasir Bolton, and Hunter Sallis in the backcourt, I don't think Hickman would start. But, Few could sell to him that he's likely to be the primary ballhandler in 2023.
Ya, this looks more and more likely. IDK how much he will play next year, he would probably end up being the 4th best guard but maybe the second best point guard on the team. But would be a huge get and really help the 2023 squad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dukedevilz
Ya, this looks more and more likely. IDK how much he will play next year, he would probably end up being the 4th best guard but maybe the second best point guard on the team. But would be a huge get and really help the 2023 squad.

Any news on Timme? If he returns, which I suspect he will, you guys have a very solid case for being preseason #1.
 
ADVERTISEMENT