Place to put my Nonsense Thread.
- Thread starter lurkeraspect84
- Start date
I know you don’t, because you can’t be objective about Biden. You’ll defend him the way you say Ghost defended Trump.
A man drives his SUV down the center of a Christmas parade intentionally killing 6 and injuring 60 (mostly children) and you don’t think the president should’ve visited the community and/or victims.
This is a good example of UL not realizing how ****ed up the Waukesha attack was and then rather than adjusting his take he doubles down because politics > logic.
This is an example of your usual faux outrage over a president visiting one place over another because you have a hard on for Biden. Just let it go. You’re essentially arguing about nothing. Merry Xmas Hail, quit being a Scrooge. I’m getting off here bc it’s Christmas, I suggest you do the same or you can just argue with yourself.
It’s not about visiting Kentucky over Waukesha. There’s no reason he couldn’t visit both. The Waukesha Christmas parade attack was 19 days before Kentucky’s tragedy. Why does have to be visit one or the other?
I mean Kentucky is pretty bad ass, who wouldn’t wanna visit? That’s you saying that by the way. You only you. No one else has said that lol. Good lord your posting style hasn’t changed in 7 years. At least your consistent.
Yeah, I figured you’d go this route. Troll instead of admitting you weren’t aware how bad the Waukesha attack was. The Waukesha attack was 19 days before Kentucky’s tragedy. There’s no reason he couldn’t visit both communities.
Why’d Trump disparage the people of California after the wildfires instead of keeping his mouth shut and giving condolences to those who lost their lives and homes?
Not even comparable. Trump is not relevant to the fact that Biden avoided a terrorist act because it wasn't the kind of terrorism that the left has been fabricating. Didn't quite meet the narrative.
You’re not going to catch me defending a president shitting on tragedy victims.
Likewise, I figured I wouldn’t catch you defending Biden’s choice to avoid Waukesha after you spent the past month telling us how you hate the left now or w/e. You using that attack as troll fodder puts you on Phil level and for the life of my I can’t understand why you’d wanna be on that.
I hate the left and the right extremes. I just don’t know why he didn’t visit, nor am I freaking out about it like yourself.
Because it didn't fit the narrative. He would have been there ten times over had the suspect been white and the victims were black. And I am not saying race played a role. I am saying that race would absolutely been the narrative if it were flipped.
Maybe you would if you had the ties to Waukesha that I do. Maybe you would if you knew how bad the attack was. Like Brooky said, no one knows what Waukesha is. It got shockingly low coverage from the national media. It was out of the cycle quick.
Find me a tragedy like California or Waukesha that I used as troll fodder, please.
I got coverage of it, also why are you talking about brooky?
Lol I didn’t troll you weirdo. Also, you troll all the time, so cherry picking those two things kind of seems arbitrary. Don’t get on your holier than thou high horse all of the sudden.
It was a black male with a criminal record who was released on a hilariously low bond (set by a democrat DA in shithole Milwaukee) that had posted about attacking white people on social media and then went out and drove through a parade of white elderly and children killing 6 and injuring 60.
Because Brooky appears to have been right about his comment that Waukesha didn’t get much coverage so people don’t know or care about it.
I said find me anything like those. There’s been plenty of tragedies over the years of me posting here. Find one I used as troll fodder.
Didn’t he get life or something? As he should bc he’s a psychopath. Or is the trial still going on? I heard about all of it as soon as it happened, but haven’t heard a follow up with the court.
Why would I find that? You troll constantly. I’ll go ahead and cue in the “thought so”…but no. Literally don’t care enough to dig up some of your back and forth’s with posters.
Not the narrative of this particular case. The overall narrative that white supremacy is the greatest threat to the country. Like mentioned earlier, Joetato was quick to visit a POS rapist who was rightfully shot by police because the narrative is a black victim of white supremacy. This did not fit that narrative. So he didn’t find the time between naps and changing his diapers to visit the victims.
I didn’t say it wasn’t covered. But apparently it wasn’t covered well if those were legitimate questions. When I said he was released on ridiculously low bail In referring to his crime several weeks before the massacre.
“Brooks has a lengthy criminal recordand a history of violence against women. Only weeks before the parade attack, he was arrested on multiple felony and misdemeanor charges after he allegedly got into a domestic dispute with a woman, followed her to a gas station and then intentionally ran her over with his vehicle. A few months earlier, in May 2021, he was arrested on a domestic violence battery charge in Georgia after allegedly striking his girlfriend.
He is a registered sex offender in the state of Nevada, where in 2006 he was convicted of felony statutory sexual seduction for impregnating a 15-year-old girl. Brooks has also previously faced drug and weapons charges.”
$1,000 cash bail from the democrat DA because of bail reform. Commits mass murder weeks later.
The narrative of this case, too.
-A black male with a history of violence, talking about attacking white people on social media, and then carrying out this attack.
-Democrat bail reform leading a democrat DA office letting this guy out on $1,000 bail after he tried to run over a woman with his SUV. Two weeks late he uses that same SUV to run over parade victims, killing 6 and injuring 60.
Those aren’t things Democrats are going to talk about much. Maybe that plays into why Joe didn’t visit, despite visiting Jacob Blake’s family a year early. Or maybe it really is lack of assets like Jen Psaki said.
When posters accuse others of avoiding a topic because of their political bias when that same poster clearly avoided a topic because of their political biases is it because they are a hypocrite and don’t care or just don’t realize it? My guess is the former. Thoughts?
What topic did I avoid because of my political bias? He asked about Trump, I answered. Not your best try, Cory.
I did leave for about 5 hours and celebrated Christmas like a normal person. And now I’m back. Weird how that works. Don’t be an idiot.
Similar threads
