ADVERTISEMENT

Place to put my Nonsense Thread.

FFoYYKPWQAAXhpB
 
No you wouldn’t
Reasonable people can look at individual cases as individual cases. Liberals look at everything through generalized lenses. You like to ask questions that you think you already know the answers to. Your presumption of how other people would view a similar situation as the Rittenhouse case if it were at an opposite rally (lol, not riot) just illustrates your ignorance.

It would be at a blue lives rally where not a single time has there been businesses burned, looted or destroyed. The odds of there being an armed person there with same intentions as Rittenhouse would be low. However, if the hypothetical black person legally carrying a gun while never using it to threaten anyone were to be chased, threatened harm and physically attacked, he would have every right to use his gun in self defense. Every reasonable person believes this. On the flip side, I doubt you would think the black person would be guilty if say, Rittenhouse was black and everything else in the situation was the same.
 
No you wouldn’t.

He was guilty in my eyes because it was unreasonable to say the first guy was a threat to his life. That was based on video.
You can't tell me how I would react to something lol I'm telling you that my argument for him being innocent had nothing to do with race. So reversing them would make no difference to me. Shocking, I know.
 
You can't tell me how I would react to something lol I'm telling you that my argument for him being innocent had nothing to do with race. So reversing them would make no difference to me. Shocking, I know.
You guys tell the ‘Libs’ how they would react all the time. So don’t give me that crap.

If a BLM supporter shot a blue lives matter dude who chased him, you are not going to convince me you would be on the shooter’s side. Sorry, not happening.
 
Apparently the way to beat racism, is with more racism.

I would have never guessed
There is no real effort to end racism from the people who claim to want racism to end. If there were no racism, they wouldn't have anything to keep society divided. They're trying with the radical gender shit, but they don't have enough internal support for that to work. They're also trying to pin the vaxxed against the unvaxxed, but that will eventually end too. Long story short, racism has to exist for them to exist.
 
The way things are going, we might find out soon enough how you guys will react.

Then again, maybe you all do think people should be shot to death for chasing people. That’s not a better look.
 
There is no real effort to end racism from the people who claim to want racism to end. If there were no racism, they wouldn't have anything to keep society divided. They're trying with the radical gender shit, but they don't have enough internal support for that to work. They're also trying to pin the vaxxed against the unvaxxed, but that will eventually end too. Long story short, racism has to exist for them to exist.


I agree. And I feel racism is very overblown. At least up North here
 
The way things are going, we might find out soon enough how you guys will react.

Then again, maybe you all do think people should be shot to death for chasing people. That’s not a better look.
I know you're ignoring me. But for shits and giggles, read the details of the case in the linked article and tell me if you think this was self defense. Please.

*the bottom one*

 
that...and self applied nooses and random garage ropes that resemble a noose b/c its tied rope. Both required nation wide reporting for weeks on MSM media.
Don't forget FBI investigations. The FBI sent more agents to investigate a garage door rope than they did to credible reports of potential violence with the valentine's day school shooter. Which they did no follow up on until after he killed all those people. Priorities, bra.
 
You guys tell the ‘Libs’ how they would react all the time. So don’t give me that crap.

If a BLM supporter shot a blue lives matter dude who chased him, you are not going to convince me you would be on the shooter’s side. Sorry, not happening.
You are going off the rails a little bit today. Not much discussion can happen if you eliminate how someone can feel or react towards something.

Me: I feel this way because of this

Brooky: No you don't, you can't prove it

I mean why even respond? haha
 
No you wouldn’t.

He was guilty in my eyes because it was unreasonable to say the first guy was a threat to his life. That was based on video.
Right. The first guy, that TOLD HIM HE WAS GOING TO KILL HIM AND THEN PROCEEDED TO CHASE HIM DOWN.

Definitely unreasonable....

Kyle's thought should've been, "Shit, he was prob just joking. He prob just wanted to be homies. I should've waited until he killed me to find out. "

đŸ˜†đŸ˜†đŸ˜†đŸ˜†đŸ˜†đŸ˜†đŸ˜†đŸ˜†
 
  • Like
Reactions: cdbearde
that...and self applied nooses and random garage ropes that resemble a noose b/c its tied rope. Both required nation wide reporting for weeks on MSM media.
Still curious if anyone has explained what a common garage door pull rope looks like to a certain professional race car driver that has surely been in a garage a time or two. đŸ¤”
 
Still curious if anyone has explained what a common garage door pull rope looks like to a certain professional race car driver that has surely been in a garage a time or two. đŸ¤”
You gotta drop the story at that point b/c you cant backtrack all the bullsh*t they rolled out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kevin Bryan
Anyone posted this yet?

I saw it yesterday. He was fired and will prob go to prison, deservedly so. Just tase the dude or kick his wheelchair over at least before unloading your mag in his back. Go to Youtube and watch any of the videos on a channel called Police Activity. Nothing but unedited police shootings.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JimboBBN
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT