Glad we agree it's evidence. The end.
It’s evidence for the court case, that’s why I referred to it as that. Not evidence for your claim. But yes, it’s evidence for the case on hand
Glad we agree it's evidence. The end.
What is it evidence of then? You're walking all over yourself here.It’s evidence for the court case, that’s why I referred to it as that. Not evidence for your claim. But yes, it’s evidence for the case on hand
What is it evidence of then? You're walking all over yourself here.
Evidence is entered into court as a tool. This demonstrated that Oregon was paid. If not that, what else?
Louisville fans said the same thing. Look at them now. Oregon is dirty and you know it.The evidence is Dawkins claiming Oregon made a financial offer. That part we all agree on. When asked if Oregon actually made on offer, Bowen couldn’t recall any. That’s basically where we stand now unless something else comes out.
You can speculate all you want, just acknowledge what it is
The evidence is Dawkins claiming Oregon made a financial offer. That part we all agree on. When asked if Oregon actually made on offer, Bowen couldn’t recall any. That’s basically where we stand now unless something else comes out.
You can speculate all you want, just acknowledge what it is
It exists and will come out as the trial continues.Maybe so. It’s possible evidence will be shown later proving this. It just doesn’t exist now