Note to self - @NC_Trojan10 is incapable of having a reasonable discussion.Lol Purdue got dominated by ND. That's a team that lost to Radford. Purdue is trash haha.
Note to self - @NC_Trojan10 is incapable of having a reasonable discussion.Lol Purdue got dominated by ND. That's a team that lost to Radford. Purdue is trash haha.
My comment was over the top in what respect exactly? Since my over the top statement both Borden and NC have agreed that it is not over the top.This is why I said Pig was over the top.
The rest of my response was essentially saying that a win at IU is more impressive than a neutral court win against Butler.
Several of those posters post here on the national board. It's relevant considering they routinely skewer IU fans for either projections on our own team or for Purdue. Several of them have been ridiculously off base with their projections to the point of being beyond laughable. So, sorry not sorry you don't like that I post links here making fun of Purdue fans GBI. If you don't like it, feel free not to click on the link. If that doesn't make you feel better, maybe take a break from the board, remove your panties, and then join us again. K? Thanks in advance.While equally a waste of keystrokes, I think it's at least expected that rival fanbases discuss each other. But running to the national board with "can you believe these Purdue fans are homers for Purdue?! LOLz" just seems like a weird discussion topic in the middle of the season. Could just be me, though.
FIFY. Don't be dishonest.Note to self - The vast majority GBI is incapable of having a reasonable discussion.
My comment was over the top in what respect exactly? Since my over the top statement both Borden and NC have agreed that it is not over the top.
My position is the clearly best team doesn’t win on a last second three against Butler
Several of them have been ridiculously off base with their projections to the point of being beyond laughable.
Then don't read it. Problem solved.Every fanbase has these people. We could pull the same crap from every fan base in the Big Ten and it would make this thread unreadable.
By the way, this is really no different than what I have done. So it's cool if you do it, but an someone else does it, it makes the board unreadable? Ok...Note to self - @NC_Trojan10 is incapable of having a reasonable discussion.
Butler is 9-3 against SOS 128. IU is 9-2 against SOS 221. IU beat them on a last second shot on a neutral court. The only silly thing here is your opinion that it’s unreasonable to question the idea that IU is not clearly the best team in Indiana. Personally I’d take IU straight up against Butler, Purdue or ND in a neutral site game. Maybe a 1 to 1.5 favorite. Maybe. That’s not how I’d define clearly better.I think this is over the top. It's basketball. Teams play well some days and play poorly some days. The result of one single outcome in no way implies what you say IMO. To date, I think IU is clearly the best team (and it hurts to type that). Trying to argue against that because a single outcome was close is silly IMO.
After reading again, I think you were saying ND was clearly the best team between ND and Purdue that day. The first time I thought you were saying ND was clearly the best team of all 4 teams there that day.Note to self - @NC_Trojan10 is incapable of having a reasonable discussion.
Not at the level of Mkgcbb, he's the worst poster I've ever seen. Dude is literally saying he would take mister 2 layups and 3 turnovers Nojel Eastern over Romeo Langford. He's an absolute joke and as a fanbase you should be embarrassed to have him in yours.Every fanbase has these people. We could pull the same crap from every fan base in the Big Ten and it would make this thread unreadable.
We don’t claim him.Not at the level of Mkgcbb, he's the worst poster I've ever seen. Dude is literally saying he would take mister 2 layups and 3 turnovers Nojel Eastern over Romeo Langford. He's an absolute joke and as a fanbase you should be embarrassed to have him in yours.
Taking the overall SOS isn’t a good indicator imo because if you play the number 1,2, and 3 teams aswell as the 351, 350, and 349 teams your SOS will be around the same (with my understanding, I could be wrong) as a team that played teams directly in the middle. Obviously that second team is more likely to go 6-0 while the first team is likely to go 3-3 even with the same SOS. In IU’s case, they lost to Arkansas on the road and to Duke on the road. Butler’s two losses are worse even though they have a higher SOS.Butler is 9-3 against SOS 128. IU is 9-2 against SOS 221. IU beat them on a last second shot on a neutral court. The only silly thing here is your opinion that it’s unreasonable to question the idea that IU is not clearly the best team in Indiana. Personally I’d take IU straight up against Butler, Purdue or ND in a neutral site game. Maybe a 1 to 1.5 favorite. Maybe. That’s not how I’d define clearly better.
Note to self - @NC_Trojan10 is incapable of having a reasonable discussion.
Fair enough- what is a good indicator of IU being “clearly “ better than Butler? What was the Vegas line in that game?Taking the overall SOS isn’t a good indicator imo because if you play the number 1,2, and 3 teams aswell as the 351, 350, and 349 teams your SOS will be around the same (with my understanding, I could be wrong) as a team that played teams directly in the middle. Obviously that second team is more likely to go 6-0 while the first team is likely to go 3-3 even with the same SOS. In IU’s case, they lost to Arkansas on the road and to Duke on the road. Butler’s two losses are worse even though they have a higher SOS.
Fair enough- what is a good indicator of IU being “clearly “ better than Butler? What was the Vegas line in that game?
Thanks - apparently Vegas feels IU was not clearly better. My guess as I said above is IU would be 1 to 1.5 favorites in a rematch.Butler was -1.5
Thanks - apparently Vegas feels IU was not clearly better. My guess as I said above is IU would be 1 to 1.5 favorites in a rematch.
Good thing i don't need approval from a couple dbags to be a fan of a team!same as John Hoosier.
Snu definitely is bannedAs a pretty neutral observer (and three plus year participant) of the B1G threads,
it's ~ 8:1 Indiana : Purdue posters bringing in garbage takes from free boards.
If you remove a certain poster's posts (just remove them all), it'd be closer to 1:1.
I get the want to lol at whatever garbage take tickles your testies, but it's pretty telling when posters continuously bring comments (from another board) and attempt to pass them off as a popular take from the "majority" or "most" or "lots of" saidteamfans.
Every single active free board has horrorific homer takes.
For the love of maturity, laugh at their takes on their own board..
If you're banned from their board, maybe it's time for some self-reflection.
Snu definitely is banned
Haha true. He obviously has another handle to keep up on all the threads that are posted. If i had to guess he is probably posting still under these alternate handles. I swear the guy reads our board more then 99% of Purdue fans lol.Probably the least shocking thing ever posted. Laughing
You take this place way too seriously, man.Several of those posters post here on the national board. It's relevant considering they routinely skewer IU fans for either projections on our own team or for Purdue. Several of them have been ridiculously off base with their projections to the point of being beyond laughable. So, sorry not sorry you don't like that I post links here making fun of Purdue fans GBI. If you don't like it, feel free not to click on the link. If that doesn't make you feel better, maybe take a break from the board, remove your panties, and then join us again. K? Thanks in advance.
Do I? You think so? I actually don’t, but thanks for your concern. Appreciate it.You take this place way too seriously, man.
Purdue outnumbering Auburn fans at least 10:1 in Nashville. Fun time at the moment. Great city.
I'm going to already call it ....if Michigan is ranked #1 and undefeated....IU will win! Its happened so many times before in that building....where a top ranked team comes in and gets an L. Especially since its going to be a night game on the weekend ....dear God the stars couldn't be more in line. Unfortunately, if that all plays out I'll fully expect them to lose their next game to rutgers.Michigan could very well be ranked #1 by then, certainly top 3. It's going to be a hell of a game, can't wait.
Do I? You think so? I actually don’t, but thanks for your concern. Appreciate it.
I'm going to already call it ....if Michigan is ranked #1 and undefeated....IU will win! Its happened so many times before in that building....where a top ranked team comes in and gets an L. Especially since its going to be a night game on the weekend ....dear God the stars couldn't be more in line. Unfortunately, if that all plays out I'll fully expect them to lose their next game to rutgers.