Did you read that from the charge sheet? If yes, you may have read it wrong. It said she was 16 or older, not that she's underage.Allegedly
It’s not true. But unfortunately in today’s environment, all that matters is public perception. In that he’s likely already guilty.For his sake, and the victim’s, I hope it’s not true.
Dude had made his way into potentially being a lottery pick.
What are you even talking about?MSU fans are confused with how the Illini fans are acting. Give it time I'm sure but.
I believe that Kansas right to consent is 16 and above and that is why the charge reads 16+.Allegedly
Yeah I think that prolly is the caseI believe that Kansas right to consent is 16 and above and that is why the charge reads 16+.
Your program is rape U you fvcking chooch.What are you even talking about?
Shannon's been CHARGED. When's the same occurred in MSU's program?
The fact you brought up MSU ....., unprompted. How much space does State occupy in your head?
This is about the stage where three or versions of the "truth" circulate.It’s not true. But unfortunately in today’s environment, all that matters is public perception. In that he’s likely already guilty.
Evidently Shannon fingered a girl in a bar in Kansas. But because he misrepresented himself as a football player(unsure why he did this), she’s claiming it’s rape due to him lying about who he was.
Apparently neither the DA or the party pressing charges think they actually have case to get a conviction on rape, but they are using that in the hopes of getting him to plea to the lesser charges.
Under Kansas law this is all supposedly applicable.
Yep. There will be his truth, her truth, and somewhere in the middle will be the real truth which will likely not see the light of day. Fast forward months from now and he will plead guilty to a misdemeanor sexual misconduct.This is about the stage where three or versions of the "truth" circulate.
And he will still be drafted at the same place he would have had this never happened. The NBA has proven time and again that they really don't care about real or perceived character flaws (see Brandon Miller for the most recent example).Yep. There will be his truth, her truth, and somewhere in the middle will be the real truth which will likely not see the light of day. Fast forward months from now and he will plead guilty to a misdemeanor sexual misconduct.
Yeah because the university police at MSU refused to pursue rape accusations against MSU basketball playersWhat are you even talking about?
Shannon's been CHARGED. When's the same occurred in MSU's program?
The fact you brought up MSU ....., unprompted. How much space does State occupy in your head?
I’m hitting the hoops transfer portal and taking my talents to ButtgersUh….Michigan…….
That’s just because they won their bowl gameI’m hitting the hoops transfer portal and taking my talents to Buttgers
SPell it out for me.
Considering we lost to Will Wade, the cheating joke seems a bit forced. But I am butthurt.
So far there has only been 1 story, even going back to the weekend this actually happened.This is about the stage where three or versions of the "truth" circulate.
Well, there are at least two:So far there has only been 1 story, even going back to the weekend this actually happened.
Hearing rumors this isn’t going to make it to trial…
The woman’s version is insane, and most certainly won’t get a conviction. Her and the DA know this.Well, there are at least two:
The woman’s version and the IL fan’s version.
Well, you were obviously there and saw it all so……The woman’s version is insane, and most certainly won’t get a conviction. Her and the DA know this.
Hence why this is never going to make it to trial.
Went back and read most of this thread, and I gotta say you’re a massive idiot.Well, you were obviously there and saw it all so……
Hate to agree with the resident potato, but we have no idea what the victim’s version is. Everything that is out there is likely from Shannon and his lawyer, which will obviously be very one sided.Went back and read most of this thread, and I gotta say you’re a massive idiot.
Feel free not to respond to anymore of my posts.
If we don’t know what the victim’s version is now, we likely won’t.Hate to agree with the resident potato, but we have no idea what the victim’s version is. Everything that is out there is likely from Shannon and his lawyer, which will obviously be very one sided.
You seem way to confident on that. IF what you are saying is true, there would be two primary reasons why:If we don’t know what the victim’s version is now, we likely won’t.
Like I said before, this isn’t going to trial.
Shannon has texts from her.1) Victim’s story is bogus (how the fck would you know this?)
Link?Shannon has texts from her.
She wanted him to be her boyfriend, which doesn’t exactly make much sense considering these are way after the supposed “rape”.
Also has texts from her trying to coerce him for money.
Anymore questions?
I know this is going to sound crazy, but he’s not putting these on the internet and is making sure they get into the proper channels within the legal system.Link?
Could be true, but YOU telling us all this doesn’t make it so.I know this is going to sound crazy, but he’s not putting these on the internet and is making sure they get into the proper channels within the legal system.
Just letting you beforehand, so when the trial doesn’t happen, you (and others here) will know why.
I don’t care if you believe what I’m telling you now, just remember you were told this when the charges are dropped prior to trial.Could be true, but YOU telling us all this doesn’t make it so.
so you are just spreading rumors to a bunch of strangers about two people you have never met regarding a event that happened in a place you have never been.Went back and read most of this thread, and I gotta say you’re a massive idiot.
Feel free not to respond to anymore of my posts.
Cool 🤷♀️I don’t care if you believe what I’m telling you now, just remember you were told this when the charges are dropped prior to trial.
Right on cueso you are just spreading rumors to a bunch of strangers about two people you have never met regarding a event that happened in a place you have never been.
I can see why you don’t want me to respond to you.
I have no inside info.Could be true, but YOU telling us all this doesn’t make it so.