ADVERTISEMENT

No Blue bloods in the Final 4

Is that good or bad for CBB?

  • It is great, it will expand interest and create new fans

  • It sucks, the old guard will not watch, viewership will be down

  • Don't care I'm dusting off some Blu rays from 1978 off to watch


Results are only viewable after voting.
Sparty is pretty close.

What I find more interesting is that the teams that recruit the one and drones are not there.

It seems a little bit of experience is a useful thing
It would appear experience has it's advantages.
 
Had a hard time deciding between the first 2 options. I’ll be happy for the school that wins it, but now I don’t have a team to root for (or against). I’m a bit indifferent now.
 
I think it’ll feel a little anticlimactic, but I’m all right with that.
 
I really enjoy watching tournament games without a team to cheer for. My bracket's busted, my team's out (as are the other annoying fanbases). Nothing left but to enjoy some good basketball.
 
  • Like
Reactions: della
If I can sum up the four teams in the Final Four it might be that they are the four toughest teams that took the court. In the end...it would be tough to argue to the contrary.
 
I don't buy people watch for the Blue Bloods.

Duke maybe. Outside of that, I think it has more to do with which regions of the country are represented.
 
ADVERTISEMENT