Astoria is gorgeous. I’ve never seen such green landscape where roses grow naturally everywhere. My point with all of this, is people need to step out of their comfort bubble and experience the beauty of the west coast. Politics shouldn’t hamper your life to the point of you not visiting beautiful cities/landscapes.
Nor cal isn’t hot, it’s mild. And did you just ignore my post about why politics shouldn’t matter while you’re taking a vacation? Let loose a little man. You seem tense 24/7 about politics. No one is going to come up to you and start berating you because you’re a republican.
Get outside of Denver and Boulder County and it’s a pretty hard republican lean.
You realize Colorado gets pretty hot in the summers right? Like upper 80s.
That’s fine, but it sounds to me you’re basing it off political climate, which is asinine logic. Not everyone here is liberal. It shouldn’t matter anyways. I wouldn’t not visit Michigan because of its politics, especially the upper peninsula as you previously stated.
Not necessarily. SF doesn’t get above 75. Portland/Seattle stay pretty mild too. San Clemente is like 75-80 year round. Kinda why people consider Coasal Cali to have the best weather year round in the states, but continue on with your uninformed opinions.
I still need to visit San Diego. I’ve been everywhere else on the west coast except for there. My buddy grew up in Chula Vista. 77 degrees every day nearly 365 days a year sounds amazing.
San Diego is awesome, my cousin lives in Seal Beach between Huntington and Long Beach, not a far drive from SD, and it’s gorgeous. Perfect weather. You gotta visit, plus babes everywhere.
I thought you said you preferred milder climates, that’s why I informed you that it doesn’t get very hot. For the latter part of your question, I must’ve missed it.
It doesn’t rustle me but I am curious why you don’t have any interest to see and experience other cultures? There’s some pretty amazing things out there that no story on the internet or tv can explain.
No, however, a place you’ve never stepped foot in seems to deeply rustle you for arbitrary reasons.
Enough with the rustle talk. I’m merely speaking on the fact that you haven’t had first hand experience in places you’ve never once visited, yet seem to know the ins and outs of how shitty they are. Seems kind of odd to me, eh?
We still have to meet up in St. Louis to play in that Bond tournament. Loser reimburses the winners travel expenses.
That’s fine if you have other places on your list to visit than northern or Southern California, but to keep bludegoning the fact of how shitty they are kind of makes you look foolish, seeing as you haven’t been there to experience it. Don’t go, stay within your realm of comfort, just don’t preach about things you know nothing of. Anyone can read a slanted article about how awesome or shitty a destination is, but to be objective and visit said place first hand, then you reserve the right to make judgment.
Even if you won I can totally afford your gas money, fast food and night at a Motel 6.
So you’re going to keep dodging the question and move on to arguing semantics, cool.
Insinuating you wouldn’t visit a place based on political climate, and not knowing weather based climate, but still having a hard pressed stance on the fact you’d never visit, kinda sounds like you think it’s shitty, no?
So far I’ve read about a hypothetical tour guide trying to get said tourists to use gender fluid pronouns, and that you wouldn’t want to visit a hot climate (even though it isn’t, which I’ve tried to “bludgeon” that in your head repeatedly) and you’d prefer a cruise in Alaska, because somehow that would be cheaper than taking a flight from Detroit to SFO which when planned ahead of time would run about 350-400$ round trip.
