I'm not sure what ripthru's comments about handlers has to do with anything anyway. It makes no sense.
Road the post I quoted. Maybe that will clear things up for ya!
I'm not sure what ripthru's comments about handlers has to do with anything anyway. It makes no sense.
Road the post I quoted. Maybe that will clear things up for ya!
It still doesn't make sense. What does a handler that Roy didn't deal with have to do with Roy dealing with handlers? It also isn't like I'm claiming Roy never deals with any 'handlers'. Him avoiding some in the past has certainly cost him a bit but it isn't as if he tells them to 'f off' of something. In this case not sure what you are going for though.
Ok... I’ll spell it out for you some of your homies on THR would have folks believe that the only reason you guys miss on a recruit is because they have “ handlers” and Huckleberry Hound doesn’t deal with said handlers.
Hi Kevin Bryan...SMILEI agree, as does North Carolina. Glad we are on the same page.
You clearly need to work on your spelling.
And Jones@Matt Laurer please change the thread title to- Williams, Barret and Reddish will be the best frosh trio since.....
Hell, we could keep it as a duo and say Jones and Williams. Jones and Reddish. Jones and Barret.And Jones
@Matt Laurer please change the thread title to- Williams, Barret and Reddish will be the best frosh trio since.....
And Jones