Still better than politics
Kansas vs Kentucky
- Thread starter KUhawks34
- Start date
- Status
We are gonna beat you silly and **** you stupid. Hawks by one basket.
No doubt.
I guess I'm just surprised, we all know exit ***ger is a douche, but the other KU fans on this board are… were solid posters.
UK fans catch hell on here because, apparently, we start shit, but this thread is a perfect example of what happens quite often here.
Every Kentucky thread turns into a dumb pissing contest. Hm. Common denominator?
Is "classy" the word you'd use to describe the Kentucky fans on Rupp Rafters or in this thread?
I'm still not over 38-1.
Looks like you only pay attention to the threads created to rile UK fans up. There's never a complimentary thread about UK or Calipari on here.
So tell me again about this common denominator.
That's pretty good. We just have 12 National Title games winning 8. Not quite the win% you guys have.
Modern era---SOme say 1984 when tourney expanded to 64.
1984: IU was 4 seed----Elite 8; beat heavily fav UNC in SW16
1986: 3 seed...Lost 1st round
1987: 1 seed----Won title
1988 4 seed---lost 1st round
1989: 2 seed---lost to 3 seed Seton Hall SW 16
1991: 2 seed---lost to 3 seed KU in SW 16
1992: 2 seed---lost in FF to 1 seed Duke
1993: 1 seed---lost in Elite 8 to 2 seed Kansas
1994: 5 seed---lost in SW 16 to 8 seed Boston College
As a 1 or 2 seed,IU never failed to reach the SW 16. Never lost in the SW 16 to someone they were heavily favored over. As a 1 or 2, never lost in the 2nd round.
In 2002 IU was a 5. Advanced to the title game
In 2012---as a 4, lost to #1 UK in the SW 16
2013 makes me sick---But still, advanced to the SW 16.
2017 as a 5, advanced to the SW 16.
As you said, and I agree---IU with not as many opportunities. BUT---when they had them, more often than not, they didn't piss them away...
Dude, it ain't even close....
71.8% of the time this game is a blast. Sucks ass the other 28.2%.
Think KU is the obvious pick. Will be the first big game in college for our entire team that takes the floor. The weird COVID empty arena might help a bit in that, I suppose.
Lol brother 48 tourney appearances for KU with a 107-49 record and only 3 titles but 15 final fours LOL not to to mention your 3-6 record in title games...that’s a 33% winning percentage compare that to UKs 8-4 record and a 66% winning percentage....
Finished the year #1 more than UK and still has less titles in that 1980-1985 timeframe LOL
I'm talking about the final poll. It was kinda hard to win a tournament title last year.
I am too, And about last year...you guys probably would’ve lost in the first 3 rounds in classic fashion like you have a ton this decade.
most consider when the 3 point shot came into existence as the "modern era"Modern era---SOme say 1984 when tourney expanded to 64.
1984: IU was 4 seed----Elite 8; beat heavily fav UNC in SW16
1986: 3 seed...Lost 1st round
1987: 1 seed----Won title
1988 4 seed---lost 1st round
1989: 2 seed---lost to 3 seed Seton Hall SW 16
1991: 2 seed---lost to 3 seed KU in SW 16
1992: 2 seed---lost in FF to 1 seed Duke
1993: 1 seed---lost in Elite 8 to 2 seed Kansas
1994: 5 seed---lost in SW 16 to 8 seed Boston College
As a 1 or 2 seed,IU never failed to reach the SW 16. Never lost in the SW 16 to someone they were heavily favored over. As a 1 or 2, never lost in the 2nd round.
In 2002 IU was a 5. Advanced to the title game
In 2012---as a 4, lost to #1 UK in the SW 16
2013 makes me sick---But still, advanced to the SW 16.
2017 as a 5, advanced to the SW 16.
As you said, and I agree---IU with not as many opportunities. BUT---when they had them, more often than not, they didn't piss them away...
Dude, it ain't even close....
that is what changed CBB as we know it today
expanding the tourney never really changed much
top 4 seeds still win most of the titles
And why do you think that happens?
Could it be because your fanbase is full of d-bags (particularly on Rafters) that trash anyone and everyone? Could it be you're also thin-skinned and overreact to say, someone calling the Cats "Kitties?"
There are at least as many jabs taken at UNC, Duke and KU. Difference is, you don't see their fans crying about it like children.
And Cal will probably never win another title at his current pace. Guess we should both throw in the towel?
Btw, even with the chokes, KU is in the elite 8 every other year and in the final four every 5 years.
Lol at @IUfanBorden shouldn’t you be limping around the basketball court officiating a kindergarten game
That's pretty good. Last 12 years we're in the Elite Elite every 1.5 years, Final Four every 3 years, and National Title game every 6 years.
Idk why you guys are surprised. Toonces has been the only good KU poster here since I started posting in 2012. The rest are trash homeboard posters.
KU wins by 7-10 pts. Our offense will struggle.
KU wins by 7-10 pts. Our offense will struggle.
I haven’t seen one good UK poster. All trash home board posters that are raft-tards
I think its going to be a really, really good game. I think most, sensible UK fans, know this. And have learned to temper their expectations----after Duke beat them by 650.
NPreston was solid, man....I miss that dude.
He’s the most ruhtarded Kansas fan on here. Not even close.
shouldn’t you be throwing up some all time stats at me? I’m sure you have a few more you haven’t mentioned
For reference, "Cats by 90" is a tongue-in-cheek saying used by UK fans for years. Has nothing to do with Kansas.
- Status
Similar threads
