Duke runs clean program. K asked NCAA about Bagley read article
- Thread starter herecomesduke
- Start date
As I still get part of those "massive" tax cuts from big corporations, I appreciate every damned cent.
Uhh, how do you think folks get to keep their jobs? Raise Corp tax and see how long it takes for those businesses to go elsewhere. Or just ask a Clinton/Gore voter.
SmokinSmiledumbass.
I am 72 and have 28 teeth. They had to remove my "wisdom" teeth. Something that you don't know anything about, dipwad!
He has no money, but dumbshits like you and me, LetsGoDuke, are bringing in the dough because we invest. We have to pay for his welfare! jumpingsmile
Fun, laughter, or amusement, especially that derived at another's expense.
You really mean that?
I doubt it. I bet if you ever decided to floss, you could do so with rope. I hope you have XXXXL Depends to cover your wrinkled and flatulent 72-year old rump.
Corporations simply don’t make decisions based on taxes,
I can tell you with 110% certainty that this writer is full of shit. I work for a very large corporation that most definitely bases decisions off of taxes. Our execs were extremely nervous that Clinton was going to win the election.
As for the layoffs mentioned in the article. Happens all the time in every sector. It's unfortunate. Happened to me when Obama took office. Luckily Corp tax rate wasn't increased, forcing them to pack up and move to Mexico or China, which is what I was initially referring to.
He's NOT winning championships with the most talented rosters in college basketball.
Laughing Triggered!
Why not become a fan of the non-ignorant right-wing rhetoric I didn't mock?
That's true, a minute fraction of its amount would exponentially exceed the universe's capacity to contain it.
I would agree with that.
I would also say anyone who thinks Hilary would have undone America is crazy. She was pretty far to the right of Obama.
I would also say anyone is who isn't at least concerned about the decreased taxes and increased spending coupled with financial and environmental regulation rollbacks doesn't watch pay much attention to History.
I don't like the spending. But I don't see how it is better with one party vs the other. The last two presidents increased the debt at ridiculous levels each and they had completely different policies. So I don't know what would be different about that with her.
If she was far right from Obama, she didn't show it. Her problem was she didn't have a plan. She played social politics and labeled an entire base of Americans as racist. It didn't work for her. That, and she is so unlikable and doesn't relate with anyone. Trump relates to people that don't even like him as a person.
I agree with your first point. The problem is we are cutting revenue and spending more. At least with Dems, they attempt to pay for it. Cuts and increased spending are good for me and my business. So is decreased regulation. But I can't help but be concerned with their long-term effects.
Hilary Clinton is brilliant and organized. She is a hawk and strong on defense. She also happens to be a terrible candidate. She was fooled by her team to spend time on social issues and avoided policy almost entirely. She was way too passive and nice in the debates. She thought Trump would look so foolish, she wouldn't have to do much. She should have eviscerated him. Hilary would have won going away if she embraced the inner bitch and was honest in the fact she didn't really care about SJWs.
I'm not so sure about the bold. We're probably still a generation away from women getting away with the same level of aggression men get away with.
