I wasn't using that as a synonym for raw talent. I think those teams had plenty of capable college players. I'm basing that more on eye test than hype. Not every roster can look like those from 2010, 12 or 15. There's an element of randomness to the tourney (but of course this doesn't stop people from downgrading KU historically for being a basket away from three more titles), but I also think some of his teams have underperformed in the regular season. Was the SEC strong enough in 13, 14 and 18 to justify an average of 11.5 losses? Especially the year that 40-0 shirts were printed. So is it your opinion that the sports media and Kentucky fanbase expects too much in most years, and that Calipari has gotten everything reasonably possible out of his teams? What do you expect from next year's team?