Almost. Missing UCLA and Indiania.
College Basketball Blue Bloods
- Thread starter Novanation11882
- Start date
Anyone talking about history and leaving UCLA off your list is just lol. I’m not a fan or anything but it’s like a bunch of kids talking about best bands and not mentioning the Beatles.
THIS IS THE LIST......
NO.......INDIANA'S IS GONE, I REVOKED IT!
Next question.
If UCLA hadn't done anything in the 2000's I'd understand it but they made 3 final fours and one title game. Add in their 11 titles and it's nonsense not to have them in there. Indiana on the other hand...
Stop yelling. I can see lower case letters just fine. No need to get ALL CRAZY.
Again, your list is wrong. Add UCLA and Indiana, and you’re good. You don’t get to revoke anything.
Too late, already did.
Ruling is final, good day sir.
The dude that has 25 posts in 15 years doesn't get to make the final ruling sorry.
Blue Bloods - Active Membership:
- UK
- UNC
- KU
- Duke
Blue Bloods - Membership Currently Suspended:
- Indiana
- UCLA
That's the list. There are other really good programs out there but they aren't Blue Bloods.
- UK
- UNC
- KU
- Duke
Blue Bloods - Membership Currently Suspended:
- Indiana
- UCLA
That's the list. There are other really good programs out there but they aren't Blue Bloods.
Simple question. Were you good in the 40s', 50s and 60's?
How about the 70's
80's?
What about the 90's?
That's great and all but what about the 2000's?
Did you stop at 2000's or carry on to the 2010's?
Has it been almost a century since you've been relevant?
Blue bloods are 90%.
I admittedly struggled with Indiana. It's been a while since they've thrown together consistently strong results. I think their membership is getting very close to being fully revoked.
I just see it as taking a while to get the blue blood tag so it would take a while to completely lose it.
Indiana has two more titles than Kansas. Indiana has been playing good basketball ever sense they laced them up.
They are blue blood to me.
Last edited:
Watch what you're asking...There's a certain little city school that fits that criteria...Multiple Final Fours in Multiple Decades under Three Different Coaches...National Championships in three differert tournaments (NAIA, NIT, NCAA)...Has made the NCAA Tournament more than Indiana, and is tied with Duke in that catagoy, and is in the top 6-7 in NCAA Tournament Statistics...They fit and fill your 90% criteria...Sooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!
Is OP’s name Andrea Adelson? Title of the article thinks 3 blue bloods are in the final four.
http://www.espn.com/mens-college-ba...make-interesting-hard-believe-2018-final-four
http://www.espn.com/mens-college-ba...make-interesting-hard-believe-2018-final-four
That’s funny. Nobody is talking about her story in the comments. Everybody is talking about why she said 3 bluebloods are in the final four.
Since they’ve laced them up huh. They've have two final fours in 26 years. Them laces must be getting loose. Go ten years further, it’s only three in 36 years. If Hoosier fans find that blue blood material, awesome. Beyond that one year in 2002, haven’t done anything since Knight left
Last edited:
Lmfao ....won another title with Ollie. Nova was one lucky run plus a pile of crap until Wright arrived. 4-2, don’t be an idiot.
I am honored to be the respondent for your first post. It is good to have you on the best basketball board on the internet.
Welcome.
Who is your team?
As an aside, I am a Kentucky fan who has no love for Indiana. If you read enough you will find that I don't want the UK vs Indiana games renewed; however, Indiana is one of the best basketball programs, one of the best followings, one of the best histories................ It is a good program. Even when they are having a down year their faithful shows up.
Similar threads
