LMAO
Was K not on the sideline? I'm struggling to understand the comparison.
But yeah, since we're removing blame from K because of a freaking missed FT, we can definitely remove the title game vs Syracuse when KU missed 18 FTs. And the loss to Stanford when they were missing one of the most talented players of all time. Both tourney losses without Azubuike. Bucknell because Langford wasn't healthy. Michigan due to missed FTs and a 10 second call. Etc.
Duke had a generational talent surrounded by TWO MORE lottery picks, plus two more top 15 players and two other top 30ish players. WTF more do you want? They beat a good Kentucky team by like 40, and you're saying they weren't good enough. Hilarious. Who's fault is it that they peaked in the first game of the season, btw? Not a good look for the coach when your team gets worse throughout the year.
That KU team was unranked to start the year and no one from the roster was drafted after the season. It was an accomplishment to get them to a 4 seed. Comparing the expectations of the two is absolutely hilarious.
K also lost to Lehigh and Mercer. Both worse than any tourney loss in KU history.
Dude had all the talent in the world every damn year and still failed to play to seed a majority of the time.