1st place at the end of the season is all that matters and they have finished there more than anyone else has
Western Kentucky is better than Auburn all time.
- Thread starter lurkeraspect84
- Start date
Its very easy to understand why an auburn fan has no grasp of all the different things one must consider when ranking programs on historical success, but its a little deeper than who has the most titles. If it were that easy, there would be nothing to debate, it would be cut and dry.
I am?
Just trying to keep our criteria consistent. By the criteria established in this thread, UCLA is far superior to Kentucky, yes?
It is cut and dry. Didn’t realize playing for second place and other things is what we are going for now
Cool story. Go tell all ur sec buddies how ucla is better than uk historically bc they have the most titles. Im sure they will mostly agree 😂
Grown men with 420 in their usernames usually need to keep it as simple as possible.
My SEC buddies? You mean UK homers? Yeah that’s a rational group to get an opinion from.
We already had a big thread years ago on ranking the top programs. Hell @dukedevilz has a pinned thread on it too.
Kansas is 4th, though I think you can squabble between them and Duke.
Kansas is 4th, though I think you can squabble between them and Duke.
You wouldnt know rational if it hit you over the head.
Literally only in one category. The Sporting News has issued a ranking of the greatest programs of all time. You should read it.
Yet when u look it up in the record books it still says Louisville with a little star next to it. Weird.
Keep aligning urself with the ncaa rulings its a good look. Our 2013 title is certainly more legit than the ones yall won over half a century ago with players on the roster who were shaving points and thus blackballed from the nba before they ever even got there. But i guess for you its not unless the ncaa says so lol
You should read the entire thread, ur backing the wrong horse.
Keep clinging to that mythical banner. The one so mythical that you can't hang anything about it in the Yum. U6 has been the poster child for modern times and getting busted by the NCAA and they're still not done with you. None of UK's banners are in jeopardy, so your wishful thinking is exactly that.... wishful thinking.
Bc the ncaa picks and chooses who to punish and how hard to punish them……which is why no one cares about them vacating our title or whether we have a towel hanging on the ceiling. Everyone knows who won that year, even the ncaa or theyd remove our name from the recordbooks and give michigan the title. U can laugh and smirk all you want, we still won the games, still cut down the nets, and still have those fat ass championship rings. Oh and the most recent title in the state. Yall will always have draft night though.
....all meaningless. Given your current status as a dumpster fire, it's no wonder you're hanging on to all the moral victories you can come up with.
LoL, Auburn basketball historically has always sucked.
It's like Kentucky and Vanderbilt football historically.
Auburn basketball being great it icing on the cake for a football school.
It's like Kentucky and Vanderbilt football historically.
Auburn basketball being great it icing on the cake for a football school.
Nice to know winning the title is a meaningless moral victory these days.
Wait, I know the only thing that matters to the simple minded uk fans such as urself………scoreboard 🤣
Dude, you don't know what a trap game is, and we're supposed to care about your trailer park analysis? 😂
When Phil is right you really gotta take a step back and evaluate
When your achievement is reduced to *vacated*, harping about it like you do is the epitome of clinging to a moral victory. U6 might get the occasional W in the basketball rivalry, but I'm sure you know, it's not very often. (17-37)
No one was harping about anything until you decided you were gonna be the ncaa’s local self appointed sheriff errrrrr special editor lol.
Is AU really a football school anymore? You're a UT fan, what do you think about AU being a middle of the pack SEC football team?
Yep. And here's the data from my table. Western Kentucky is 35th all-time, meanwhile Auburn is not in the top 75.
WKU is benefitting from a lot of conference championships, and while they aren't receiving the same amount of points as P6 conference, I'm still looking at tweaking the conference title points a bit. Regardless, I think it's objectively true that Western Kentucky is better than Auburn on a historical basis. Maybe Auburn will slide into the top 75 after this season.
Similar threads
