It’s not slavery as the kids in Duke’s case get a $200,000 education... She is a moron.
Oh, I was considering that among "all the bling and the bells and the sneakers and all that" that she exempted in the first sentence of what she allegedly said.
And then when she goes on to allegedly say "you've paid for a child to come to your school to do what you wanted them to do for you," I took that to mean "play basketball."
Then, allegedly, when she went on to say, "for free, and you made a lot of money when he did that, and you've got all these rules in place that say he cannot share in any of that," I figured what that really meant was "playing basketball."
And then the way the OP wraps up, with her saying (allegedly), "The only other time when labor does not get paid but yet someone else gets profits and the labor is black and the profit is white, is in slavery," I thought, "Huh, that's a little harsh, but I get what she's saying."
Then I thought, "Wait, should I be mad?" And then I thought, "Why? I mean, I didn't
personally own slaves, so why should I be all blustery and defensive? I'm not a snowflake, after all."