Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I mean they have more titles than Kansas so if they aren’t Kansas isn’t eitherIs Indiana still a blue blood?
I dunno....Did they take away all of our wins, national titles,. FF's NCAAT wins, appearances,etc...? If so, then no..Is Indiana still a blue blood?
Depends on your definition. One Final Four and zero titles in the last 35 years at least leaves it open to question.Is Indiana still a blue blood?
And yet that is still more final 4’s than Purdue in the last 35 yearsDepends on your definition. One Final Four and zero titles in the last 35 years at least leaves it open to question.
At the end of the day tho, I don't really care. It's a silly moniker created by the media and they'll say whatever gets the most clicks.
I mean they have more titles than Kansas so if they aren’t Kansas isn’t either
Purdue has won the most big ten titles of all time. Should they be considered a blue blood also since you want to push regular season accomplishments so much?You SEC idiots should really just stick to football. 😆
Who is clearly not a blueblood and never has been. You a big fan of goalposts?And yet that is still more final 4’s than Purdue in the last 35 years
You seemed to want to take a shot at IU. Thus be prepared to receive a shot back.Who is clearly not a blueblood and never has been. You a big fan of goalposts?
Purdue has won the most big ten titles of all time. Should they be considered a blue blood also since you want to push regular season accomplishments so much?
Agree with you about what? Indiana has just as much of a claim to blue blood status as Kansas. This isn’t really debatableNext time you’re in the mood to post idiotic takes, just remember that 99% of the world agrees with me. But you can probably find some good ol boy on the football board to side with you.
Reading comprehension is a struggle for you.You seemed to want to take a shot at IU. Thus be prepared to receive a shot back.
Agree with you about what? Indiana has just as much of a claim to blue blood status as Kansas. This isn’t really debatable
No it’s really not. 5-4It's totally debatable.
What's not debatable is that you continue to display a profound lack of fundamental basketball knowledge.
Yep. There are like 9000 definitions of "blueblood" but anyone who suggests something that might not align with @AuHoosier420 is clearly wrong.It's totally debatable.
What's not debatable is that you continue to display a profound lack of fundamental basketball knowledge.
I am glad you are learningYep. There are like 9000 definitions of "blueblood" but anyone who suggests something that might not align with @AuHoosier420 is clearly wrong.
Agree with you about what? Indiana has just as much of a claim to blue blood status as Kansas. This isn’t really debatable
They do as well. Kansas shouldn’t get a pass for many empty post seasons.By your logic, Uconn does too. And Nova until a year ago.
One of the most common debates on this board “isn’t really debatable.” I rest my case.
Won the national title 1995I think UCLA is as debatable as Indiana at being a blueblood. Ucla besides like an 11 year stretch has done exactly what in ncaa?
It's gotta piss off all the mids that Kansas was considered a Blue Blood back in the 1980s, when they only had one NCAAT Title.I mean they have more titles than Kansas so if they aren’t Kansas isn’t either
Yeah. @ExitFlagger likes to bring up ucla had one dominant decade. I mean before 1987 which is is only 36 years ago Kansas had 1 title and duke had zero.It's gotta piss off all the mids that Kansas was considered a Blue Blood back in the 1980s, when they only had one NCAAT Title. 😭😭🤣🤣🤣🤣
They do as well. Kansas shouldn’t get a pass for many empty post seasons.
06-08 3 straight final foursWon the national title 1995
Prior to 1988 should of Kansas have been considered a blue blood?But let’s give passes for a generation of nothing.
So San Francisco is equal to Michigan St? See how easy it is to destroy your logic?
****ing football school fans.
Prior to 1988 should of Kansas have been considered a blue blood?
Kansas (and Self) have been much better the past several decades, including 2 titles and 2 runner ups totaling 6 championships (4 NCAAT) all-time. If IU can win another title, they can revive their blue blood status.I mean they have more titles than Kansas so if they aren’t Kansas isn’t either
Huh? My title literally says ucla in itKansas (and Self) have been much better the past several decades, including 2 titles and 2 runner ups to go with 6 championships (4 NCAAT). You also didn't include UCLA in the list of blue bloods still playing, and they have more recent and historic success than IU. If IU can win another title, they probably can revive their blue blood status.
Derp moment by me. Still, I think Kansas is more of a blue blood right now than IU.Huh? My title literally says ucla in it
What makes a program a so called, "blue blood"?But let’s give passes for a generation of nothing.
So San Francisco is equal to Michigan St? See how easy it is to destroy your logic?
****ing football school fans.
Thing is ucla won a title in 95 and has been to the final 4 times 4 times since indiana last went.What makes a program a so called, "blue blood"?
--Is it 20 years of work
---Is it 30 years
---is it 40
Ot is it ALL-TIME?
I mean are we breaking this down into segments? If so, I guess....
---UCLA quit being one a looooooooooong time ago.
---Duke just recently joined the band..
--Indiana has joined UCLA...
So maybe what-----Old blue blood money----and New blue blood money.
How do we gauge Kansas? Were they a blue blood by default, i.e. inventor of the game. Won a bunch of games and conference titles....But until 2008, only had 2 titles....Was KU always a blueblood b/c they won a bunch of games, made the NCAAT, etc....but just not at the levels of UK, IU and UCLA----until they won their 4th title? Or was it their thrid in 2008?
Or does it really not matter? You tell me.
I know....But if we are doing segments, I mean no title since 1995. One FF the past 15 years(miracle run in 21)....Thing is ucla won a title in 95 and has been to the final 4 times 4 times since indiana last went.
What makes a program a so called, "blue blood"?
--Is it 20 years of work
---Is it 30 years
---is it 40
Ot is it ALL-TIME?
I mean are we breaking this down into segments? If so, I guess....
---UCLA quit being one a looooooooooong time ago.
---Duke just recently joined the band..
--Indiana has joined UCLA...
So maybe what-----Old blue blood money----and New blue blood money.
How do we gauge Kansas? Were they a blue blood by default, i.e. inventor of the game. Won a bunch of games and conference titles....But until 2008, only had 2 titles....Was KU always a blueblood b/c they won a bunch of games, made the NCAAT, etc....but just not at the levels of UK, IU and UCLA----until they won their 4th title? Or was it their thrid in 2008?
Or does it really not matter? You tell me.