...and I'd rather have 'old' titles for my team, with the ability to add more, than ZERO titles.
On this day 16 years ago Kentucky and Tennessee
- Thread starter Scotty00
- Start date
Looky here in one of her older post, she wants to use the all time head to head advantage but when it comes to UK she just likes the “Here and now”😂😂😂
Bingo!!!! Been saying this for years about her!
Last edited:
Your arrogance knows no bounds does it? I would not have thought of you as an identity politics kinda of guy, but the evidence is there (me, as a UT fan
) Your inability to explain how UK's past titles will aid them in attaining new ones shows your lack of grip on reality.
You’re full of shit! You have said many times “if you’re not first you’re last” and “Getting to the final four and losing is a failure”. Do you not get that people have seen you post this stuff over and over??? I promise you I’m not the only one that remembers you saying all that.
Also what about the “here and now” and the “I time frame from when Barnes got to Tennessee”? You said that’s what you had to go by because he and Cal was the current coaches and nothing before that mattered so now that Pope is here why are you still throwing up what happened Cals last few years at UK??? I’ll wait anxiously for your reply!!😘
Bingo again!!!
Game over!!! She really has no clue how dumb she sounds trying to down UK when Tennessee in the last 6 years has its 2nd (behind Pearl) best coach ever and has had some of its better teams ever along with what many UT fans call the best player ever (DK) at UT and has absolutely shit to show for it. At best you split with UK or get swept. How the hell does she think UT is the king of college basketball?😂😂😂😂
Success can go to some people's heads.... especially when it's 'new'.
Still won't help you with a title, right? Why won't you just admit it or try to refute it? This is really point, set, match.
You've lost your mind. Blue Blood programs are exactly that because of how often they are contenders, even favorites for NCAA titles in the vast majority of college basketball seasons that have been played and for the successes they have achieved. For you to keep trying to dismiss that is just futile.
I've not lost my mind, you've lost your ability to support your rhetoric. I'm not dismissing old wins, I am dismissing the relevance they have for winning in the present and future. That is pretty clear.
But it will help you! You don’t never get this from recruits because UT has no history or tradition but have you never heard a recruit say “yea I know all about UK, KU, UNc and Duke because of the tradition and history”. It’s real Deller!
She has none of that so she don’t get it.
We are talking about past success helping future teams with success. Your babbling is so off point. You appear to have difficulty staying on point.
Of course it helps win titles...sustained success and multiple titles helps attract the best players. With NIL, it is now no longer the only attraction, but still plays a big part.
The better players a team has, the more likely they are to have success in March. Doesn't guarantee titles, but it is an added advantage to those programs to put them in a better position to win titles.
I would much rather recruit the best players by showing them a trophy case full of hardware with an NIL package then have an empty trophy case with an NIL package.
But that is just me.