JFC.....Are you trolling? Have to be. Forget the 13 more three's. For some god damn reason, you are stuck on that. So just erase it. Forget it.
Ok. Lets go slower. Back to NOVEMBER. Ok----you with me? Alright.
Game number one.....Or two....or three. Five. six or 10. Game 12, 13 or 15. I don't care . Lets say, from DAY ONE, to NOW, he shots his HS percentage. In other words, there wasn't a time where he was shooting 16% from three. Where he look so terribly uncomfortable taking a "3". That from the get go, Langford was the decent shooter here, that he was in HS. All hypothetical of course. But, I mean, that was the context of my original post.
IF......IF....THis were the case, then IMO, his average would have been closer to 20ppg; or more. Its b/c it would have made him NOT so one-dimensional. Once teams saw he couldn't hit water from a boat, they sat back in the lane, and waited. Yes, it would ahve been a terror trying to defend this kid, with his skills on gertting to the rim, had he had a consistent shot from three. It would NOT have allowed teams to just pack it in on him, sit in the lane, and wait. Why is this so hard to understand?
JFC......