I agree it would be a disadvantage but the committee is supposedly following S curve and if kentucky is behind duke and UNC, which all your ACC brethren seem to think, one of them will likely have us in Louisville.
How good did Marquette feel playing kentucky in Minnesota in 2003?
Sometimes if you follow the S curve the lower seed gets the location advantage
Fair enough. I don't have Kentucky behind both Duke and UNC. I would have Gonzaga, UVA, UNC, and UK as 1 seeds right (in some order). I think Duke needs to win the ACCT or lose a close game in the finals and Zion has to play significant minutes in those games to get a 1. Their resume is really strong at the top but they need to show the committee that they are the team that earned those strong wins.