UK is probably gonna suck as well but how long of a losing streak is B1G on?
A whole conference of suck.
I would think one team would step up.
A whole conference of suck.
I would think one team would step up.
Big 10 is gonna suck again.
- Thread starter lurkeraspect84
- Start date
I honestly have nothing else to do but eat granola and shit post.
Purdue will probably win the big 10 again and then lose to 15 seed McNeese St. in the 1st round of the dance
PU and MSU should both be top 10 all year. The rest of the conference is garbage except for Northwestern.
All the B10ers on this board are gonna toss your salad for saying that.
I'm used to it. We have a history.
If you're on this forum long enough, there will be several attempts of tossing your salad.
you just have to make them eat it😉
you just have to make them eat it😉
If it’s little, the SEC must be microscopic. 7,000 teams and one final four in 8 years and counting. 😆
Little 12 and SEC had a very competitive basketball challenge, even though we couldn't play some of out best teams against them. Try again home skillet
LOL. Rarely was one of the top SEC teams sitting out, but they left their bottom-feeders at home every year. 3 of 10 is not competitive, and it gets worse when you factor in all games played between the leagues.
Head to head, tourney, computer metrics….the Big 12 has been far better in recent years, even as the SEC has become much more competitive than before.
BOOKMARKED!!!!!!!!
A DePaul fan jumping on the Northwestern bandwagon is how you know it’s gotten REAL bad. 😉
we have 14 teams Blind Baby!
I think there was a 1 year difference in wins in the challenge
I hate conference pride. But I love shitting on the B1G.
no one's jumping on the bandwagon. I'm a lifelong Chicagoan and have cheered for my hometown Big10 team since the 80s.
I used to like you as a poster
I have no redeemable qualities.
Indiana is still a year away from restoring order.
Hasn't this been said the last 25 years?
I also root for LSU and once every 15 years or so they're really good.
No, he's mostly right. MSU and Purdue should be the class of the conference. IU has a lot of good guys coming in, but as Illinois has demonstrated, that doesn't mean anything unless they mesh. I do think that Woodson is a better coach than Underwood though.
Purdue will once again at some point be ranked #1 in the country and then rip my heart out in the tournament. It's written in the stars.
IU is a huge mystery.
1. Are Mgbako and Ware as good as advertised?
2. What type of leap will Reneau, Gunn and Banks make?
3. Can Cupps/Newton contribute?
4. Shooting? X shot it well...so did Galloway. But in somewhat small samples. Can Gunn find his touch? Cupps was a relly good shooter in HS.
Lots and lots and lots of questions.
On paper? Look really good.
X
Galloway
Mgbako
Reneau
Ware
But as you say---does this team mesh? Do guys live up to expectaions? If Ware/MM live up to their rankings---IU could be pretty good. and IF the shooting is there, well then this becomes a relly good team.
Similar threads
