Seems like the year the SEC and ACC are having this year (a down year for certain for both) is what the PAC 12 would consider successful in just about any year.
ACC and SEC are now 3 bid leagues
- Thread starter HRTheCard
- Start date
I'm not sure why you're saying that, I never accused anyone of saying the ACC wasn’t down. I made a completely different statement. I simply said the SEC (AKA: "SEZ") is > the ACC.
They say this every year and every year Sean Miller shows us just how pathetic he is as a coach.
His offense is bland and his defense is average. His players don't give much effort and they always flame out early.
When Buffalo beat them two years ago, those Arizona players acted like they didn't even want to be there. Buffalo was scoring on Ayton at will and he did nothing to try to stop them.
I get that, but who has said that ITT or on this board even? JC and his band of mouth breathers can’t go a single thread without saying “U6”, what’s the difference?
Cocks did their part. Went on the road & tore 2 ACC teams some new assholes.
I’ve done that before.
I’m sorry man, but I watched probably 12 VT games last year. I saw Blackshear play in person. He was a solid player, but there is no world in which he “dominated.”
In Tallahassee last year, Blackshear was 2-6 with 9 points, 5 rebounds, 4 turnovers, and he fouled out.
Sure he had some good games. Especially against weaker competition. But to say he “dominated the league” is as silly as saying the SEC is “easily” better than the ACC.
Why are you quoting something I didn't say? I never said he dominated the league. I said he dominated in the ACC ladt year and there were certainly games that he did just that.
And yes, from what I see, the SEC is easily better than the ACC from top to bottom.
Damn - and to think the ACC is supposedly a basketball league ...... That's bad. Especially considering FB is Clemson and the 13 dwarfs.
You literally just said he dominated the league. “He dominated the ACC last year.” Lol.
The ACC and SEC are both trash this year. To suggest one is easily better than the other is pure folly. Literally no stat would back up that assertion.
The ACC is the closest thing to shit that isn’t actually shit.
Uhhhh, show me where I said "He dominated the ACC last year"
Show me a post number. You're taking a 2 letter word out of my quote, which drastically changes my statement.
What's up with that? Why are you misquoting what I said? I already told you once that you misquoted me and you did it again.
And there are stats that back up league strength and rankings. Also, the SEC is projected to get 5 or 6 teams in, the ACC might get 4.
Top 3 vs top 3:
Kentucky vs Duke
Auburn vs Louisville
LSU vs Florida St
Does the SEC win any of these?
How does adding “in” change what you’re saying? Dominated in the ACC. Dominated the ACC. It’s the same thing.
There are plenty of stats showing the league rankings. You’re right. None of them show either league being “easily” better than the other. Both leagues suck.
I would take the SEC in all three of those.
You can't tell the difference between "Dominated the ACC" and "Dominated in the ACC"? Come on man.
Dominating the ACC means he kicked EVERYONE'S ass, dominating in the ACC means he manned his position and outplayed most, if not all the power forwards he faced. There's a huge difference. But for whatever reason, you kept leaving the word "in" out when you were trying to call me out. I bet it's because you needed it to sound like something it wasn't.
And yes, the SEC us easily better than the ACC this year. I know it hurts, but it is what it is. Head-to-head, South Carolina beat UVA and Clemson and UK beat Louisville and Georgia Tech. I'm sure there are some ACC wins over SEC teams, I just can't think of any at the moment.
This is a crazy year, I can't remember the ACC being this down.
1. No I don’t see the difference. Blackshear had some good games. Some 20 and 10 games. But he wasn’t this unstoppable force. He was basically the same as he is this year. Some good games some bad. So is he dominating IN the SEC?
2. Off the top of my head, UNC beat Bama at a neutral site, FSU won at UF by 12, and FSU beat Tennessee on a neutral floor.
3. The ACC is ranked slightly ahead of the SEC by KenPom and Torvik ratings and you think the SEC is “easily” better. That’s some funny stuff right there, Paaaauuuulll.
Blame the FBI. Tell ya what, Champ.... when the FBI investigation stuff all comes to an end and if things go as 'easy' as you think they will on your program, maybe I'll let that name they gave you ride off into the sunset. Until then, you guys are U6.
Bracket Matrix Rankings of S-Curve:
5. Duke
6. Louisvile
11. Florida State
12. Auburn
17. Kentucky
23. LSU
That's based on merit, according to more than 90 bracketologists. The 3 ACC schools are also ahead of every SEC school using the computer models. Even if the SEC gets 1-2 more teams in the dance, odds are the ACC will still have more combined tournament wins.
5. Duke
6. Louisvile
11. Florida State
12. Auburn
17. Kentucky
23. LSU
That's based on merit, according to more than 90 bracketologists. The 3 ACC schools are also ahead of every SEC school using the computer models. Even if the SEC gets 1-2 more teams in the dance, odds are the ACC will still have more combined tournament wins.
Not really. We beat your ass last year on your own court and this year you have to come to ours. Will be a close game again and if you guys come out with a win which you won't consider yourselves dam lucky.
Laughing excuses,excuses. Guess our payed players were the real reason ey lol ?
UK is a good team but everyone in the top 25 is very even this year. Least we didn't get beat by Lancaster lol but any loss in SEC play doesn't surprise me this year.
U6 is in full shade mode right now. Not so much for UK, considering it's been over 30 years ago.
History never erases itself. Your history of cheating will always be in the books.
...and yet U6 is still front page news whenever the FBI investigation/cheating in college basketball is brought up.
Yet no one cares aside from cayut fans such as yourself. Clickbait that blue necks masturbate to. Use whatever timeline that “doesn’t matter” because “it was a long time ago”
History books will forever remember Kentucky’s cheating in two separate decades. Nothing will erase that, as much as you’d like it to be forgotten. That’s why everyone laughs when cayut fans point fingers.
....classic deflection. I'd rather my program's issues be long over with from over 30 years ago than present day with more potential punishment looming.
History never dies. You must’ve skipped over fahrenheit 451 during school if you made that far. You can yak about it being a long time ago all you want, but the history books never forget. Sorry not sorry.
Similar threads
