ADVERTISEMENT

You have a choice: For 1 year only Red Meat or Alcohol.....which one?

athletics-header.jpg
 
I NEED my booze. I can live without red meat for a year. Innocent people would die if I couldn’t have my alcohol.

Why? Because I drive the streets of Charleston SC daily. And the only reason I avoid wrecks is that I assume that every other driver is an incompetent functioning idiot. That end of the work day drink makes my work day worthwhile
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bert Higginbotha
I NEED my booze. I can live without red meat for a year. Innocent people would die if I couldn’t have my alcohol.

Why? Because I drive the streets of Charleston SC daily. And the only reason I avoid wrecks is that I assume that every other driver is an incompetent functioning idiot. That end of the work day drink makes my work day worthwhile
Good to see you over here Ghost. I need your help keeping some of these Tennessee fans straight! SmokinSmile
 
  • Like
Reactions: GhostVol
Great point but considering you didn't understand Chicken was "white meat" and not red I understand. Wanna rethink now?

I knew I would catch someone on here didn't think it was this early though.Winking
Not sure you understand the question. How much have you had to drink? Evidently you chose the alcohol.
 
I'll take alcohol. I can survive a year on chicken, pork (bacon/ham), fish, shrimp, Turkey, etc.
 
Pork = red meat, as @Big_Blue79 pointed out.
Nope. Pork is classified as a white meat in almost all traditional culinary circles. Christ, there was even a campaign about it in the late 80s and early 90s.

Pork stays for us alcoholics. If you disagree, take it up with the arbiter of meat, @rockycard . he is an expert on all things meat.
 
Nope. Pork is classified as a white meat in almost all traditional culinary circles. Christ, there was even a campaign about it in the late 80s and early 90s.

Pork stays for us alcoholics. If you disagree, take it up with the arbiter of meat, @rockycard . he is an expert on all things meat.
Did you want me Fedora boy?
 
Nope. Pork is classified as a white meat in almost all traditional culinary circles. Christ, there was even a campaign about it in the late 80s and early 90s.

Pork stays for us alcoholics. If you disagree, take it up with the arbiter of meat, @rockycard . he is an expert on all things meat.

That campaign - the other white meat - was a marketing campaign:

The industry has tried to counter this with an ad campaign promoting pork as the “other white meat,” partly because it is lighter in color than beef. According to one definition of white and red meat, which measures certain proteins in meat, pork is in between chicken and red meat (beef). But the USDA and most food scientists and nutritionists consider pork to be red meat.

Facts, unlike feeble minds, are impervious to marketing campaigns:

https://www.thespruceeats.com/pork-for-a-change-2246397
https://asktheexpert.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/1357/~/is-pork-white-meat?
https://foodandnutrition.org/january-february-2013/color-confusion-identifying-red-meat-white-meat/
https://blog.aicr.org/2011/05/25/pork-is-red-meat-and-it-increases-risk-for-colorectal-cancer/
https://www.webmd.com/food-recipes/features/the-truth-about-red-meat#1
https://www.thespruceeats.com/pork-for-a-change-2246397

However, I will grant you that (according to Wikipedia) in some Jewish circles pork is referred to as a white meat. So if you consider that a single "traditional culinary circle" that does not eat pork casually refers to pork as "white meat" as victory for you, then you really need a win, so congratulations, champ! You did it!
 
The industry has tried to counter this with an ad campaign promoting pork as the “other white meat,” partly because it is lighter in color than beef. According to one definition of white and red meat, which measures certain proteins in meat, pork is in between chicken and red meat (beef). But the USDA and most food scientists and nutritionists consider pork to be red meat.
mPMqs4Z.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Big_Blue79
ADVERTISEMENT