ADVERTISEMENT

What should become of Conference Basketball Tournaments?

How should conference tournaments be handled going into the future?

  • Change nothing. They're perfect. Let everyone do their own thing.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Every team should be eligible for their CT (see B10, minor change)

    Votes: 1 100.0%
  • Shrink the field for the major conferences, mid majors stay the same

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Shrink the field for ALL conferences, allows smaller conferences to protect their top teams

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Do away with conference tournaments all together

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    1

EvilMonkeyInTheCloset

Well-Known Member
Feb 25, 2008
52,472
23,749
113
your closet, most likely......
The whole West Virginia vs North Carolina debate has sent me down a little bit of a rabbit hole, and one of those stops revolved around how conferences will handle conference tournaments going into the future.

It's pretty apparent that despite what the committee says or doesn't say about conference tournaments, the one thing you can say about them is that they are hypocritical, because they absolutely let UNC in because they made a run in the ACC tournament and almost beat Duke, and West Virginia lost to 16 seed (out of 16 teams) Colorado in the 1st Rd of the Big 12 tourney.

So, how will conferences continue to handle their tournaments as we get deeper into this super conference era and NIL era? How do you think conferences should approach their tournaments going forward, or do you think they should just do away with them and let the regular season champs claim the automatic qualifer?
 
ADVERTISEMENT