IU is not a blue blood anymore, while Louisville and MSU were never blue bloods to begin with.
Just for shits and giggles---And to be clear, I couldn't give two ****s about "blue blood this or that..."---Its meaningless.
But anyhow---Say IU wins the title next year---So now what? Where do you rank a program that has 6 titles, Top 10 in wins, NCAAT wins, NCAAT appearancves, FF's. And lets keep this dream going----say they go back to back. Now they have 7...
Now what? Does back to back titles wipe out 25+ years of being ass? If so, huh? What sense does this make? What made IU a blue blood to begin with? What , a couple titles under McCracken? Then 3 with KNight? IU has won titles in 4 different decades....40's. 50's, 70's and 80's....Been to a FF in 6 different decades---90's and 2000's.
Argument isn't for IU---again, don't care....But more so of, is being a "blue blood" something you gain over what----being good for 20 years....30....40....50? I mean to be hnest here, outside of McCracken and KNight, IU was pretty much shit....Few good teams under Dean....Other coaches as well. So Is it IU's titles, wins, NCAAT wins, NCAAT appearances, that made them a "blue blood"----If so, then how are they no longer one?