UNc @ UL
- Thread starter Scotty00
- Start date
Cocaine is a hell of a drug.
How dare Sidney Currys neck hit Bangcocks arm and get thrown out of the game for it.
The ACC wanted UNC to win. Everything else is a lie
Your coach was a bit of a whiny little baby after the game. That has to be tough as a fan.
Don’t foul all game long and the refs may not think you are acting like the punks you were the whole game.
That call on Curry was bad. Overall you guys got what you wanted when you were allowed to hammer Bacot over and over. If they didn’t allow that the game never goes into overtime.
Doubt many care what out interim coach says after the game. Hopefully he called a spade a spade. Theres a reason non unc/UL fans all across sports are calling out the blatant screwjob, and its not bc they all hate unc.
The conference has their back, they weren’t losing.
UL made the game physical, had the refs called the game like they should 2 of your players would of fouled out. I'm not going to sit up here and say UNC didn't get a favorable whistle in OT because they did. I don't know if UL came into the game thinking they could punk UNC by playing that way, I don't know but in the end you got what you got. I can understand you guys being upset but the physical play was on you guys, thinking that was your best chance to win.
Last edited:
Its better than the POS youve been since being gifted a win last night.
Win with class troll.
Karma will smash your hiney soon.
Seeing Syd Currys throat hit Bangcocks arm and cause a foul was the difference in the game.
Like I said in my post, had the game been called correctly he would of fouled out along with Withers. The game plan was to be physical against UNC and it didn't work.
JFC----Have the "refs" ever not lost someone a game? Nevermind the turnovers, missed FT's, bad shots, offensive rebounds given up that led to points----only shooting 28/70---I mean, UL, you missed 42 fukin shots----miss only 40---you win.
Bad calls happen. Sometimes, they happen at the wrong time. The call vs Curry was bad. But no worse than about 5 or 6 other calls. But you key on one call---Why? If you don't shoot 38%, turn the ball over 13 times, and give up 12 offensive rebounds----that call vs Curry is probably moot.
Sack the **** up, and quit blaming losses on officials....JFC.
Bad calls happen. Sometimes, they happen at the wrong time. The call vs Curry was bad. But no worse than about 5 or 6 other calls. But you key on one call---Why? If you don't shoot 38%, turn the ball over 13 times, and give up 12 offensive rebounds----that call vs Curry is probably moot.
Sack the **** up, and quit blaming losses on officials....JFC.
Nah, all the whining was coming against UNC so I just defended what needed defending and didn't the other stuff. Hell, only one side has admitted they got a few good calls. You guys act like every call went against you. You aren't that dumb. You could see the gameplan they implemented with the physical play. Heck, give your coach credit. It almost worked. The whining after the game is a bad look though. That's loser ****.
I said that your team played hard and thought the coach has done a good job with them. I don't have to just shut up when people say a bunch of BS though.
So our guys were more physical than Bacot? Definitely not except in the eyes of you and the refs.
They came out being physical with him down low. It was smart. That was the best way to deal with him considering their limitations personnel wise. They were letting most all contact go down there. On both sides. It isn't like they were calling a bunch of touch fouls on UNC down there and I never said they did.
Everyone just keys on one play by Bacot in OT. It was a bad call. The whining about the T is kind of silly. Go back and look. The white dude on the ground trips him. If you watch it you will see.
The coach made a point to complain about the OT calls. He knows they were allowed to be very physical in regulation. I never said UNC wasn't but Bacot is the one guy Louisville knew they couldn't handle and so they combated that by fouling a lot. Again, it was smart but a bunch still went uncalled. It happens. I had no issues with it either. Need to be tough down there. But again, I never mentioned it until all of the complaining against him.
I back ya Cory, but this was a bs post. We got screwed, and everyone’s that’s not a UNC fan knows it. It doesn’t really matter, bc we aren’t making the tourney regardless, and I hate bitching about calls. It is what it is, but I would’ve been livid if I were M. Peagues.
Sure, he was livid and should have been about that call on Curry at the end. I think I said as much. It was a terrible call.
I also said I didn't like the first T as well (didn't even like the second one tbh). But he was pushed and was without a doubt tripped up so I think it is reasonable to say I could do without the tech while defending Bacot from people taking shots at him when HE was the one who was pushed and tripped.
Last edited:
That, and the no call on west where Bacot grabbed his leg, and Withers getting a T for an absolute nothing burger. We’re new to the ACC and I expected it.
He’s pissed, and for a good reason. But, he’s also irrational most of the time, and has wild takes. So take that for what it’s worth. Also…making up asshole names for amateur collegiate players is lame. L trust me….no one is saying “bang cock” It’s equivalent to dipshit Cat fans saying “U6” after a non-investigation of bs that resulted in nothing. It’s almost embarrassing when I see it at this point. NCAA has the mf NIL now lololol.
I can't get behind the grabbing the leg. He was literally grabbed and yanked down to the ground with the official watching. THEN he grabbed the leg. So are you also upset that the first foul wasn't called on your player grabbing and yanking Bacot to the ground? If so the other doesn't happen. The fact the second isn't called kind of proves they were letting the physical play go in regards to Bacot.
He got a T for pushing Bacot. I said I disagreed with it but it was at the very least unnecessary. Neither player fighting for the ball were threatening in any way.
I love Beasley, lol. Even though he is mad at me I have always enjoyed when he is here posting. I don't take these back and forths personally though. It's all in being a fan and having fun with it. If you can't argue and then forget about it the message board things probably isn't for you. You can be serious and mean what you say. Still shouldn't take it personally though. I like Louisville fans in general though. I have said before I had some fun with them back in 2009 at an NCAAT game and have had an appreciation for them ever since then.
Bacot will be the first NCAA athlete to compete in both men's and women's sports when he joins the women's volleyball team as a fifth year senior.
Yikes. How sensitive do you need to be to take harmless internet jabs so seriously? No one has ever made fun of Duke players for how they look, after all.
They probably did after the game. I doubt either had any hard feelings, unlike the Duke fans posting ITT.
If you think he is cute just go with it. You don't have to be all weird about it.
lol, again, look at the video. The player trips him because his foot was caught up in his. Unintentionally but he yanks his foot back and trips him.
Not saying he didn't embellish though.
Yeah, fans hate each other way more than the actual players do.
