Yes the women game is rigged and the ball is smaller and geno gets the best players and you all hate women's hoops. But that is unreal
Count me in the crowd of, if you post, you care.11th straight year of not caring
take the best boys high school basketball team not even for a state but for a region of a state and they would beat all eleven of those teams. Such a boring sport to watch
Impressive indeed. I have always wondered what Geno would be able to do in men's hoops. Less recruiting competition for Geno in the women's game. He's been getting the best of the best for decades now. The only time he really had any consistent competition was from Pat Summitt.Yes the women game is rigged and the ball is smaller and geno gets the best players and you all hate women's hoops. But that is unreal
I'm all for man > women but your post is horseshit.take the best boys high school basketball team not even for a state but for a region of a state and they would beat all eleven of those teams. Such a boring sport to watch
Would actually bet money that every region winner in the state of Kentucky would beat the uconn women team.I'm all for man > women but your post is horseshit.
If only I could take that bet.Would actually bet money that every region winner in the state of Kentucky would beat the uconn women team.
Meh, isn't recruiting part of the job?sorry but I don't give him any props. When you recruit 3 of the top 5 high school players on a yearly basis you should be in the F4 every single year. Not an impressive achievement at all in my eyes.
Meh, isn't recruiting part of the job?
Every coach is going after the best players, then in turn, winning games.
So should we hang banners on recruiting alone?I saw a stat last year which showed that something like 90% of their games are decided by 20 points or greater.
Going out and landing the top 3-4 high school players EVERY YEAR has broken the women's game. I'm completely unimpressed when they win because they should win every single game they play by 20 points.
Stopped being impressive and became ridiculous after the 4th.
So should we hang banners on recruiting alone?
Meh, isn't recruiting part of the job?
Every coach is going after the best players, then in turn, winning games.
https://www.google.com/amp/www.dail...team-suffer-5-2-loss-FC-Dallas-U-15-boys.html
Well, here’s what happened when the best women’s soccer team in the world played a bunch of boys under the age of 15. There’s other similar stories out there in the sport of soccer.
I’ve read numerous stories about CBB women’s teams playing guys in the rec center and being destroyed. Like they can’t even get a shot off destroyed. Many are probably fabricated but I believe there is some truth to it. There’s probably hundreds of boys high school teams that would crush UCONN’s women’s basketball.
I actually think this is true. I know it sounds like being an asshole, but the best high school boys can run and jump in ways that women just can't.Would actually bet money that every region winner in the state of Kentucky would beat the uconn women team.
So, Wooden's streak after the 4th wasn't impressive? Dynasty is dynasty no matter the sport!
I do think Woodens is more impressive in that the elite female athletes are so much greater than their peers than male athletes. There is just so much more separation between the top female athletes and the rest. With men’s sports, even the below elite guys can dunk and/or run by you if you f@ck up an assignment. Not so with women’s sports.So, Wooden's streak after the 4th wasn't impressive? Dynasty is dynasty no matter the sport!
Yeah I remember this being talked about 6 months ago. Something like if the 1200th ranked man in the world played her they’d win 6-1, 6-1, 6-0?An average aau team would destroy the best WNBA team.Athleticism is just too different. Serena Williams (whom I love) scrimmaged years ago against a middle to lower end male pro and got destroyed.
It’s amazing what you can do with a sport when you remove almost all athleticism from the game.The dismissal of what UConn's women does has always sort of mystified me; they move with clockwork precision without the ball and any purist has to marvel at their spacing and cuts. They don't out talent people so much as they execute them into submission. Constant open shots off of ball movement and a shot chart that has made shots from multiple players from 16-19 feet . You simply don't see anything remotely resembling their shooting percentage from 15 feet out to the arc in the men's game.
At what point did this become men vs women? The games are different. It does not make the actions any less impressive