Hard to argue 90 UNLV or 96 UK. Been lots of really good teams but I’ll be a homer. I’ll put the 89-90 and the 04-05 Illini teams on the court with anyone and guaranteed we be watching a good game win or lose
2009 UNC
This thread proves how much of a homer everyone is here. Personally, I think almost every team from 2000 on should be excluded. There might be a few exceptions, but the majority of teams since then (if not all) had players that were young and ended up going pro before they became upperclassmen. Which would make these teams not nearly as good as they could have been. Take the 2012 UK team as an example...there's no chance that a team full of freshman and sophomores are the best team in the history of college basketball! Now, if that team was assembled in the 80's during a time where players stayed 4 years, it would most definitely have a very strong argument when Davis would have been a junior.
My top 4 teams since the 70's are
1st. 75 IU team (had 7 players who played pro ball)
2nd. 90 or 91 (can't remember exact year) UNLV team which is the most athletic group of players I've ever seen!
3rd. 76 IU team which is the last undefeated team and voted the best NCAA tournament team of all time
4th. 96 UK team which is the 2nd most athletic college team I've ever seen!
The only reason I put IU above UNLV is because a few years earlier Knight proved he knew how to beat a Tark team that had a ton more talent then the IU team.
With all that said..... I would bet the house that theres older teams that were probably better then all of these. I just honestly don't know enough about any of them to make a guess.
I also pointed out that everyone here is a homer. Everyone typically includes everyone.You start your post off talking about homers and then you as an IU fan go on to list two IU teams in your top four! Laughing
This is a solid guess. I wish I knew more about those UCLA teams, but if I said anything about them, it would just be from a Google search.Probably one of
67 UCLA
72 UCLA
76 IU
90 UNLV
96 UK
So true. They had the best team that money could buy.1972 UCLA. 30-0 National Champs. Best team money could buy
2 losses? Weak.38-2. National title. First two draft picks is a trifecta.
Pretty sure the only Kenpom tracked team higher than 08 KU is ‘15 Kentucky. Since we won the title I’m going with 08 Ku. Beat 2nba mvps and won the only all 1seed final four. 08 Ku would Roll 97 Ku2008 Kansas says denied
I was debating between 67 and 72 bruinsProbably one of
67 UCLA
72 UCLA
76 IU
90 UNLV
96 UK
That team was insane...A HS buddy of mine had season tix for UL; well his dad did. We watched that UNLV team come to FreedomHall, and put on a show. Until you have seen them in person, there is no justification for how disruptive, quick, long and athletic this team was. Especially Larry Johnson. That dude was a freak.1990 UNLV
If they win from here on out, they can still match the '12 UK team's accomplishments of a record 38 wins and a National Championship.2019 Duke
I was being facetious but sure its possible though I think we"ll drop 1-2 more games before the ACCT.If they win from here on out, they can still match the '12 UK team's accomplishments of a record 38 wins and a National Championship.