in your mind? You can list ONE team. No ties, no lists. The one you'd put in a tournament against everyone else's one team.
One.
One.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'd probably go with the '15 UK team against anyone. Yeah we lost to Wisconsin, but I'd say we'd win 7/10 in a 10 game series.38 and win the title.
Maybe, I'm not understanding.
'15 UK team is trash compared to '12 UK team. 38 wins, title, and top two draft picks.I'd probably go with the '15 UK team against anyone. Yeah we lost to Wisconsin, but I'd say we'd win 7/10 in a 10 game series.
'12 UK is a great choice.'15 UK team is trash compared to '12 UK team. 38 wins, title, and top two draft picks.
Be better than that.
They're the modern day standard.'12 UK is a great choice.
Another horrible take.Kytothecore should change this thread to pick the favorite team of your school
It’s started that way. Better as it moved along. And of course Kentucky fan gonna Kentucky.Kytothecore should change this thread to pick the favorite team of your school
Because none of those programs have a single team better than the noted UK teams. I can get on board with the UNLV team, but those UK teams have every right to be mentioned.Another horrible take.
ITT, we have fans of 6 different schools. All UK fans have picked a UK team. The one NC State fan picked NC State. A Duke fan, unc fan, Kansas fan and FSU fan picked different schools than that they root for.
1990 UNLV beats any Kentucky team.Because none of those programs have a single team better than the noted UK teams. I can get on board with the UNLV team, but those UK teams have every right to be mentioned.
It would be competitive. That UNLV team had a couple of head scratchers. '15 lost 1 game. '12 lost 2 games, and one of those was a buzzer beater on the road to a blood rival.1990 UNLV beats any Kentucky team.
No team from the OAD era deserves to be mentioned. They couldn't compete with the teams full of NBA stars that stayed 3-4 years.
Right? I thought that this sounded like an off-season thread too when I went to post it, but I just couldn't wait. I didn't want to make everyone wait that long for such an important topic.Season end already?
I remember watching that team, and was always amazed at how intimidating of a team they were with Ewing's size and athletic ability as well as Michael Graham's cold stare and confidence.The Patrick Ewing led team that beat UK in the final was good too.
Unless they're playing UC - Santa Barbara.1990 Vegas for me too; suffocating and merciless.
Did I mention the GOAT? All other teams would have a great disadvantage when trying to play The GOAT.Another horrible take.
ITT, we have fans of 6 different schools. All UK fans have picked a UK team. The one NC State fan picked NC State. A Duke fan, unc fan, Kansas fan and FSU fan picked different schools than that they root for.
Really, who could beat that? ...Exactly. Teams like Phi Slamma Jamma with a junior Hakeem and Clyde the Glide would punk some 18 year old freshman.
'97 Kansas
I know lost in Sweet 16....refs REFUSED to call Bibby, Simon, et al. for some TOTAL HACK JOB Steals!!!! Haase, in that gm. was at MAYBE 65%.
Give 'em a healthy team and with their experience (Sr. Vaughn, Sr. Pollard, Sr. Haase, Jr. LaFrentz, etc.) man....nice balance in & out.
(34-1) 't'til the 'zona Loss. Only Loss (at Missouri) in Double Overtime where Kansas looked to have the ball....but in a loose scrum L. Frazier managed to get it and literally throw up a prayer that was answered.
Seeing these w/ '96 Kentucky....funny to see that them and Kansas actually both finished (34-2).
But Kentucky had TWO double-digit Losses prior to the NCAAs. As I said Kansas's only Loss was 96 - 94 in 2 OTs going in. They beat that same Missouri team after that in Lawrence & Kansas City by a combined 39 pts. the other 2x they played them.