Obviously every team is sprinkling in some transfers, but not an entire roster. Before you'd argue that having 3-4 freshmen in the rotation didn't work, and now you're saying that 100% turnover is no big deal.
Not sure how you can compare this roster to 2012. And even that team didn't have close to this level of turnover.
I think Arkansas will have continuity problems too, but if he keeps stockpiling talent, it may not be as important.
LOL, WTF? Read your first paragraph and tell me you’re not twisting the truth.
Where did I ever say mixing in 3-4 veterans out of the portal is a bad thing?
Then you literally try to act like me saying a roster full of high school kids is the same thing as a roster full of seniors out of the portal.
Here is what I have literally said over and over so you can’t twist it:
1) Give me veteran players over freshmen any day. I don't care if they are portal guys or not, give me veteran players.
2) You can't win a title in today’s college basketball with a bunch of high school kids. You have a shot if you have a transcendent or generational talent, but you're still at a disadvantage.
Now, my hope is that you can no longer twist what I have always said. You tried to make it sound like my statement about freshmen based teams carries over to teams built out of portal recruited veteran players. Those are not the same things and I never said you couldn’t win with a team recruited through the portal, those are your words.
As far as UK 2012, the team was led by 3 freshmen + T. Jones and Lamb, it was a freshmen based team, but AD was a generational player and MKG was transcendent, which proves my point.
