SEC Getting Some Love
- Thread starter KYtotheCore
- Start date
There are 365 days in a year. It’s been more than 5 years since UL won a championship.
anon_0astpxev9h4gk
Well-Known Member
You’re right. 5 years, 4 and half months. Like I’ve stated earlier itt. Winking
What happened when they played 4 seed Alabama? 24-6.
Back to my original premise; the SEC is a football conference. Hell even UK can beat South Carolina.
anon_0astpxev9h4gk
Well-Known Member
Not even close. Historically the Big 10 put a more teams in. More teams advance further. It's not even a debate. Good for the SEC that UK's there. Otherwise, it's the MVC. Facts, not a bias opinion, support this. Yes I'm aware of how many titles SEC teams have won; And fully expect that stat to be presented by you. But it's only one part. And it's the ONLY part you can use. Since 2000, the Big has placed 6 teams in the FF; MSU, UM, Wisky, Illinois, OSU and Indiana. All 6 played for a National title. And if you go back a mere two years, that FF list grows to 7; Minnesota. In that same time frame, SEC has sent UK, Florida, LSU [11 seed] and South Carl. Two of the 4 were fluke runs. And none aside UK/Florida sniffed a title game. Nor have they returned. And look at last year. SEC doubles the amount of teams by the Big 10, yet the win less games.
Not even an argumemt. More entries. More SW16, More Elite 8..More FF and more title games. But hey, since Fla and UK won a few titles, the SEC is better ? LMAO. Just no.Laughing
IU made it cool to be "back" again. I can't wait for them to start printing the "we're back" version 2.0 tshirts.
I wonder if there will be a discount if you package it with a replica Sweet 16 ring.
anon_0astpxev9h4gk
Well-Known Member
They were just trying to match the ACC tourney success of the previous season, sans UNC, obviously.
anon_0astpxev9h4gk
Well-Known Member
I'm sooooooo glad that clown show is gone. I mean at first, as a fan, you try and defend it. Then your like---What a ****tard. Miller's all business. No sob stories. No "rah-rah" shit. Just business. Accountability. And I love that.
As I mentioned. So we just ride their coattails and forget about the other 8 ACC teams that failed to make it past the round of 32? Gotcha.
Meh, I mean it's a tad better that one of the 8 did at least get past the SW16. AND win it. Plus the ACC has shown it's muscle more than once in the NCAAT. But I get what you're saying.
My point is that would be like saying all those years when UK was the only team that did shit on a national scale and everyone in the rest of the conference is all, "SEC...SEC...SEC" due to one team's success. RollLaugh
anon_0astpxev9h4gk
Well-Known Member
There’s a stark difference in teams not making it past a certain round and still not making the final four or championship game, one conference had a winner, another didn’t make it past the sweet 16.
Got it.
anon_0astpxev9h4gk
Well-Known Member
Ride those coattails of the one team that actually did something that tourney. Still doesn't take away from the fact that the other 8 (including Louisville) sucked major ass.
anon_0astpxev9h4gk
Well-Known Member
Yet the ACC continuously has solid teams make it past the sweet 16.
Keep reaching/deflecting.
#accdabest
#sezwillsez
You're the one deflecting, now you're trying to sway the conversation away from 2017. RollLaugh
#Ridethosecoattails
#Thatiswhatlosersdo
#Nocluewhatsezis
C'mon Kevin. You are much smarter than this. I mean it's a great, Top 5 spin. But c'mon man.
anon_0astpxev9h4gk
Well-Known Member
I mean, we are talking about the conference as a whole here and you two are all, "well, an ACC team won it all, so....". So, what? We don't mention the rest of the conference that didn't do shit? RollLaugh
anon_0astpxev9h4gk
Well-Known Member
Man, sure glad Nova won it all last year so the Big East can maintain that conference superiority over everyone else. Laughing
anon_0astpxev9h4gk
Well-Known Member
You’re the one sunshine pumping the sec for having a large number of tourney contestants who still couldn’t make it to the only game that matters.
anon_0astpxev9h4gk
Well-Known Member
Lol, sure. “Resorts to buzzword”I left you speechless..... and triggered, obv.
I didn't pump anything. Merely replying to your post, "Sec will flame out again in the tourney, per usual." Then you got all upset when I mentioned that the ACC as a whole did the same thing the previous season. But it's cool that the other 8 teams flamed out before or during the round of 32, since the other one went all the way. Laughing
anon_0astpxev9h4gk
Well-Known Member
Who sounds “triggered” now? Couldn’t help but respond to my obvious troll. Good stuff.
anon_0astpxev9h4gk
Well-Known Member
Ok. I'm not going argue. You know there's a difference. History defines perception. I mean do you feelnthe SEC was the best conference last year? If you do, then fine. One team will never define an entire conference. But when you've have multiple teams that have won the title, gone to FF's, etc, etc...Its easy to overlook a performance as such. BUT...When historically a conference has been, well "meh", a performance of such isn't as easily overlooked. More of a, "Well that was expected". Now if the ACC were, well the SEC, then you could argue what you are.
Totally different
Similar threads
