ADVERTISEMENT

Kentucky Resume...

That fake wife thread will go down in history.. my god that was painful to witness.
Leave any opening here..,

nature-clan-of-hyena-jatomuofhx6ncknd.gif


Even if you come strong and correct....doesn't matter.
 
So, getting caught up on this thread, I see the Twin Tards (BLOCKHEAD and 86') have been busy, desperately trying to sell how 'good' they think U6 is. It ain't working.

Your wins are coming from the shitstain that is the ACC. You have 4 W's alone over teams that were under .500 when you played them.

Your lone 'good' win is over Clemson. (Golf clap for that)

Any other team of any higher quality that you've played has handed your squad an L. You keep mindlessly flappin' your gums at UK, when they, once again, own SCOREBOARD on you.

Other than the losing squads in the ACC, nobody fears Squints & U6.

You 2 little try hards are wasting everyone's time here. You're like a couple little chess club nerds talking smack at the athletes in school.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bert Higginbotha
So, getting caught up on this thread, I see the Twin Tards (BLOCKHEAD and 86') have been busy, desperately trying to sell how 'good' they think U6 is. It ain't working.

Your wins are coming from the shitstain that is the ACC. You have 4 W's alone over teams that were under .500 when you played them.

Your lone 'good' win is over Clemson. (Golf clap for that)

Any other team of any higher quality that you've played has handed your squad an L. You keep mindlessly flappin' your gums at UK, when they, once again, own SCOREBOARD on you.

Other than the losing squads in the ACC, nobody fears Squints & U6.

You 2 little try hards are wasting everyone's time here. You're like a couple little chess club nerds talking smack at the athletes in school.
Cope, baby boy.
 
Your chess club analogy solidifies that you were most def picked on in school lol. That was probably the gayest thing I've read on this board in quite some time.
 
Your chess club analogy solidifies that you were most def picked on in school lol. That was probably the gayest thing I've read on this board in quite some time.
....throw a rock into a pack of dogs and the one that yelps got hit the hardest. Sorry 'bout your wittle feelings, Sparky.
 
Well, Louisville is 0-5 against the SEC.
South Carolina is 3-0 against the ACC, but winless in the SEC.
The ACC won 2 whole games in the ACC-SEC challenge.
Also the SEC is projected to get 3 #1 seeds. You have never seen a conference this strong and right now, you're playing in the shittiest ACC in the history of that league and you're still not good enough to be ranked, yet you're talking smack. That’s next level little bro kinda shit there.
Take it a little easy on these fellers.
 


"Analysis
  • Why so poor?: Louisville’s current roster isn’t built for SEC competition. They lack the depth, defense, and road resilience to handle Kentucky’s schedule. Their real-world ACC struggles (e.g., no road wins) amplify this.
  • Bright spots: They might upset a middling SEC team at home and hold their own in some non-conference games, especially the "Louisville vs. Louisville" anomaly.
  • Comparison: Kentucky is likely 20-5 or better with this schedule as of now, highlighting the gap.
Conclusion
If Louisville MBB played Kentucky’s 2024-25 schedule in the SEC, they’d likely finish with a record around 8-23. They’d struggle mightily against elite teams, lose most road games, and only pick up a handful of wins against weaker opponents at home. This aligns with posts on X suggesting a 9-17 record in a similar simulation—close enough to validate the ballpark estimate. Louisville’s rebuilding phase simply doesn’t match the SEC’s intensity or Kentucky’s current caliber."


Complete breakdown.
 


"Analysis
  • Why so poor?: Louisville’s current roster isn’t built for SEC competition. They lack the depth, defense, and road resilience to handle Kentucky’s schedule. Their real-world ACC struggles (e.g., no road wins) amplify this.
  • Bright spots: They might upset a middling SEC team at home and hold their own in some non-conference games, especially the "Louisville vs. Louisville" anomaly.
  • Comparison: Kentucky is likely 20-5 or better with this schedule as of now, highlighting the gap.
Conclusion
If Louisville MBB played Kentucky’s 2024-25 schedule in the SEC, they’d likely finish with a record around 8-23. They’d struggle mightily against elite teams, lose most road games, and only pick up a handful of wins against weaker opponents at home. This aligns with posts on X suggesting a 9-17 record in a similar simulation—close enough to validate the ballpark estimate. Louisville’s rebuilding phase simply doesn’t match the SEC’s intensity or Kentucky’s current caliber."


Complete breakdown.
40-0

Tell the mayor of rafters (Jimbo) that I intentionally left this thread about Kentucky and it died a sudden death.
 
UL sux so bad, they gave me a handy and put a crook on my peen. Now it looks like an L.
 
Last edited:


"Analysis
  • Why so poor?: Louisville’s current roster isn’t built for SEC competition. They lack the depth, defense, and road resilience to handle Kentucky’s schedule. Their real-world ACC struggles (e.g., no road wins) amplify this.
  • Bright spots: They might upset a middling SEC team at home and hold their own in some non-conference games, especially the "Louisville vs. Louisville" anomaly.
  • Comparison: Kentucky is likely 20-5 or better with this schedule as of now, highlighting the gap.
Conclusion
If Louisville MBB played Kentucky’s 2024-25 schedule in the SEC, they’d likely finish with a record around 8-23. They’d struggle mightily against elite teams, lose most road games, and only pick up a handful of wins against weaker opponents at home. This aligns with posts on X suggesting a 9-17 record in a similar simulation—close enough to validate the ballpark estimate. Louisville’s rebuilding phase simply doesn’t match the SEC’s intensity or Kentucky’s current caliber."


Complete breakdown.
Now whoever did that is 100% letting Louisville live rent free. If we played the four SEC teams that beat us again, we would win every single one.

Tennessee has realized they can’t shoot

Oklahoma was the game in which we lost our big man due to injury

Mississippi was our first game without Pryor, and we just got back from being 5 time zones away

Kentucky isn’t beating us without their full lineup, and then they wouldn’t beat us away from Rupp.
 
Now whoever did that is 100% letting Louisville live rent free. If we played the four SEC teams that beat us again, we would win every single one.

Tennessee has realized they can’t shoot

Oklahoma was the game in which we lost our big man due to injury

Mississippi was our first game without Pryor, and we just got back from being 5 time zones away

Kentucky isn’t beating us without their full lineup, and then they wouldn’t beat us away from Rupp.
UL may live rent-free, but glad he did the AI work for all of us to enjoy.
 
Wonder if this person knows the Big East had 3 in the FF one year.
Yeahhhh, you do realize that has nothing to do with overall conference strength. Teams get hot at the right time, like NCST last year and the tournament is ridiculously random.

The SEC is on another level, just be happy your beloved dukies are in a mid major conference this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bert Higginbotha
Last year Calipari was 18-8, this year Pope is 18-8. Kentucky won the rest of their games in the regular season, can Pope accomplish that? Or does AI say that Kentucky is better with Pope? AI ran last year’s team and roster with this year’s schedule, it had the record at 23-3. Or maybe that’s Rockycards prediction?
 
Last year Calipari was 18-8, this year Pope is 18-8. Kentucky won the rest of their games in the regular season, can Pope accomplish that? Or does AI say that Kentucky is better with Pope? AI ran last year’s team and roster with this year’s schedule, it had the record at 23-3. Or maybe that’s Rockycards prediction?
Didn’t have nearly the injuries last year, if any, that we have this year. Also, unless we lose the first game again, this season has already been a breath of fresh air in multiple ways. Fun offense, a coach that makes adjustments, some BIG time wins against rivals and top programs. Year 2 should only be better.

Also, not expecting to win today, but these are the games Kentucky has won multiple times this year. Double digit underdog on the road against a top 5 team. Sucks Alabama is coming off back to back losses, but it’s what it is. Would be a lovely game to have Lamont back but instead we get to watch Travis Perry cover the best point guard in the conference.
 
Didn’t have nearly the injuries last year, if any, that we have this year. Also, unless we lose the first game again, this season has already been a breath of fresh air in multiple ways. Fun offense, a coach that makes adjustments, some BIG time wins against rivals and top programs. Year 2 should only be better.

Also, not expecting to win today, but these are the games Kentucky has won multiple times this year. Double digit underdog on the road against a top 5 team. Sucks Alabama is coming off back to back losses, but it’s what it is. Would be a lovely game to have Lamont back but instead we get to watch Travis Perry cover the best point guard in the conference.
Yesterday I took Kentucky +7.5 why did it jump to +9.5 by the evening? Is someone else hurt? That’s a quick change in the spread.
 
Yesterday I took Kentucky +7.5 why did it jump to +9.5 by the evening? Is someone else hurt? That’s a quick change in the spread.
Only thing I can think of is that Jax and Butler were officially ruled out. Think there was a small bit of speculation Lamont would play but that was quickly put to rest. FTR I’ve seen it as high as 10.5
 
  • Like
Reactions: rockycard
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT