ADVERTISEMENT

KenPom Preseason Top 50

dukedevilz

Well-Known Member
Apr 3, 2002
11,641
15,525
113
KenPom is the best in the business. I like most of his rankings, but not fully on board with a few. Thoughts?

6 teams that I think are a little too high or low...

Too High: Texas, Ohio Sate, Purdue, Syracuse, Virginia Tech, Oklahoma State
Too Low: Virginia, Illinois, Tennessee, Arizona State, Cincinnati (#59), Georgia Tech (#73)


Strength of ScheduleNCSOS
RkTeamConfW-LAdjEMAdjOAdjDAdjTLuckAdjEMOppOOppDAdjEM
1BaylorB120-0+26.67112.4385.7870.2307+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
2GonzagaWCC0-0+26.56113.4186.81374.341+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
3DukeACC0-0+26.35111.7485.3674.338+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
4VillanovaBE0-0+25.24111.5586.2970.2303+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
5KansasB120-0+24.17108.91184.7471.9181+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
6Texas TechB120-0+23.68108.71485.0570.6280+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
7WisconsinB100-0+23.58108.21984.6268.2351+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
8West VirginiaB120-0+23.17108.81285.6773.191+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
9TexasB120-0+22.21106.93284.7370.0312+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
10Ohio St.B100-0+22.00108.31886.31070.5288+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
11KentuckySEC0-0+21.27108.71387.51871.7195+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
12IowaB100-0+21.27113.3292.07373.564+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
13CreightonBE0-0+21.20111.3690.14672.6125+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
14LouisvilleACC0-0+20.90108.12287.21471.7199+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
15Michigan St.B100-0+20.75109.21088.52872.1163+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
16VirginiaACC0-0+20.49103.87583.3165.0357+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
17MichiganB100-0+20.41109.2988.83172.3140+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
18IllinoisB100-0+20.05108.12088.12171.2246+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
19Florida St.ACC0-0+20.05107.52687.41673.662+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
20TennesseeSEC0-0+20.00107.62587.62070.3296+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
21OregonP120-0+19.98108.61588.62969.8321+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
22HoustonAmer0-0+19.77110.1890.34970.2304+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
23North CarolinaACC0-0+19.75107.92388.12274.142+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
24FloridaSEC0-0+19.52107.82488.32469.9318+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
25PurdueB100-0+19.10108.41689.33769.8322+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
26IndianaB100-0+18.99106.44087.41771.6209+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
27RutgersB100-0+18.75105.45186.61271.1250+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
28UCLAP120-0+18.41108.41790.04569.0344+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
29SyracuseACC0-0+18.29107.52789.23571.2248+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
30Virginia TechACC0-0+18.21106.63888.42669.9317+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
31OklahomaB120-0+18.03107.13089.13473.566+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
32StanfordP120-0+17.81104.36986.51172.3141+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
33Oklahoma St.B120-0+17.80106.53988.73071.9178+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
34MarquetteBE0-0+17.77107.13189.33973.755+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
35MinnesotaB100-0+17.63106.63589.03371.4231+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
36Arizona St.P120-0+17.42106.63689.23675.216+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
37LSUSEC0-0+17.17110.5793.38373.282+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
38ArizonaP120-0+17.02105.35388.22372.3146+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
39MemphisAmer0-0+17.02104.56587.51975.712+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
40ClemsonACC0-0+16.74106.04689.33870.0311+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
Strength of ScheduleNCSOS
RkTeamConfW-LAdjEMAdjOAdjDAdjTLuckAdjEMOppOOppDAdjEM
41Miami FLACC0-0+16.70107.12990.45171.3236+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
42MississippiSEC0-0+16.64105.15788.52771.5222+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
43ConnecticutBE0-0+16.29106.93390.65271.8190+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
44San Diego St.MWC0-0+15.90105.35289.44069.9314+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
45Saint LouisA100-0+15.76104.17088.42570.6281+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
46AlabamaSEC0-0+15.72106.63790.95976.76+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
47Loyola ChicagoMVC0-0+15.54104.46788.93269.4335+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
48USCP120-0+15.37104.96089.54272.6122+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
49DaytonA100-0+15.18108.12193.08070.9265+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
50Seton HallBE0-0+15.17105.54990.34873.093+.0001+0.0010.010.01+0.001
 
I think you underestimate Matt Painter, whose teams have finished 9, 19, 5, 9 and 24 at KenPom the last 5 years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dukedevilz
I think you underestimate Matt Painter, whose teams have finished 9, 19, 5, 9 and 24 at KenPom the last 5 years.

Perhaps. Certainly going to need increased production from Williams, Hunter, and Stefanovic. Haven't seen Ivey, Morton, or Edey play. I heard Morton is a really exceptional passer. I still think they're a tournament team, just not convinced that they're one of the teams which will safely be in.
 
Perhaps. Certainly going to need increased production from Williams, Hunter, and Stefanovic. Haven't seen Ivey, Morton, or Edey play. I heard Morton is a really exceptional passer. I still think they're a tournament team, just not convinced that they're one of the teams which will safely be in.
I'm a little concerned about the defense but Matt Painter coached teams are always decent at defense. Since his first season at Purdue, there has only been once that they've finished outside the KenPom top 100 in defensive efficiency. In 2012, they were 114th with Robbie Hummel as part time center and a 6'4 PF when he was (that team was structurally challenged).

Being able to surround Trevion with 4 shooters will demonstrate just how effective he is in the post and as a passer. And when Painter has shooters surrounding an effective post presence, he has an elite efficient offensive unit.
 
Half the Big 12 in the top 10? Seems legit.

Iowa outside the top 10 where they belong.
 
I'm a little concerned about the defense but Matt Painter coached teams are always decent at defense. Since his first season at Purdue, there has only been once that they've finished outside the KenPom top 100 in defensive efficiency. In 2012, they were 114th with Robbie Hummel as part time center and a 6'4 PF when he was (that team was structurally challenged).

Being able to surround Trevion with 4 shooters will demonstrate just how effective he is in the post and as a passer. And when Painter has shooters surrounding an effective post presence, he has an elite efficient offensive unit.

The 2018 Purdue team was unstoppable on offense. Isaac Haas surrounded by four guys shooting north of 40% from 3. It was sad that he had that elbow injury in the tournament. That of course is the ideal. Haas had a true shooting percentage around 66%, while Williams is around 52%. The '18 team was 2nd in the nation in 3-pt shooting percentage. Last year, they were 199th. Huge difference in offensive capabilities. Purdue is still very good. Just think they're a notch below the teams that had Caleb Swanigan and/or Carsen Edwards.
 
The 2018 Purdue team was unstoppable on offense. Isaac Haas surrounded by four guys shooting north of 40% from 3. It was sad that he had that elbow injury in the tournament. That of course is the ideal. Haas had a true shooting percentage around 66%, while Williams is around 52%. The '18 team was 2nd in the nation in 3-pt shooting percentage. Last year, they were 199th. Huge difference in offensive capabilities. Purdue is still very good. Just think they're a notch below the teams that had Caleb Swanigan and/or Carsen Edwards.
Williams TS% was 52% in large part because Nojel Eastern didn't need to be guarded. I will be stunned if it's not much higher this year.

Eastern and Haarms' offensive challenges also contributed to the perimeter shooting issues. Stefanovic proved he can be very good but it was crazy how much he became the focus of opposing defenses due to our offensive liabilities. Losing Procter, Boudreaux, Eastern and Haarms will all be a net positive for our shooting. None shot better than 31.8% from three last year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dukedevilz
I agree on all your “too low” teams. Especially Illinois and Georgia Tech. Two teams with experienced point guards, which is a big deal in this pandemic landscape.

Texas and UL immediately stood out to me as too high. UT at 9 just isn’t happening. UL, I like Mack, but they lose a lot to just plug and play some transfers in this weird year and be a top 15 team by efficiency.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dukedevilz
I would be shocked to see MSU end the year not in the top 25 on defense. This team is too talented on that end not to. I think we’ll have really solid defense on the perimeter, inside hopefully Bingham or Sissoko can be an anchor.
 
I agree on all your “too low” teams. Especially Illinois and Georgia Tech. Two teams with experienced point guards, which is a big deal in this pandemic landscape.

Texas and UL immediately stood out to me as too high. UT at 9 just isn’t happening. UL, I like Mack, but they lose a lot to just plug and play some transfers in this weird year and be a top 15 team by efficiency.

This is by far the highest I’ve seen us ranked on any type of preseason ranking, list, or poll.

Not so sure we don’t have the talent to be a top 10 contender but at this point a whole lotta fans can say the same thing.

Edit: no clue on how we project efficiently wise, just sticking to wins and losses.
 
I think we should retroactively name last year's conference champ the National Champ.

Last year basketball fans were taken away a great conference tournament.
Even the bottom teams were doing whatever they needed to win.
Anyone who played K State last year knew there was a chance you were going to get a battle.

A few teams could compete with KU last year but too many
They were a good team last year. Dotson could get to the rim when they weren't trying to get it inside.


We will see this year.

You saw the improvement with Baylor last year. Interested where they are this year.
Texas gets first crack at them
 
There is a chance that Texas is vastly underrated this year.

Just matters about their players.

Donovan Williams is one to really watch
Kai Jones
Gerald Liddell
Greg Brown


All four of them have tremendous upside.

Without an end of the season we really don't know where Shaka had the team.
They get marked down because of being a bubble team last year.
Roster wise they are up there. Rare that you see that much returning talent that has played. Even started. Everyone on that roster can start and play at a Big 12 level.
That is 13 players. Important with Coronavirus



Texas won't be Too 10 unless they are a Top 10 defense
KenPom is wrong there.
 
Last year basketball fans were taken away a great conference tournament.
Even the bottom teams were doing whatever they needed to win.
Anyone who played K State last year knew there was a chance you were going to get a battle.

A few teams could compete with KU last year but too many
They were a good team last year. Dotson could get to the rim when they weren't trying to get it inside.


We will see this year.

You saw the improvement with Baylor last year. Interested where they are this year.
Texas gets first crack at them

Assuming that Gonzaga is as defensively-challenged as usual, I think Baylor is a legit #1.
 
I agree on all your “too low” teams. Especially Illinois and Georgia Tech. Two teams with experienced point guards, which is a big deal in this pandemic landscape.

Texas and UL immediately stood out to me as too high. UT at 9 just isn’t happening. UL, I like Mack, but they lose a lot to just plug and play some transfers in this weird year and be a top 15 team by efficiency.



No contact in practice? Yikes. Maybe Georgia Tech won't be a top 50 team after all.
 
I will say this—much of FSU’s team had Covid months ago. I don’t know what the stats are for catching it again, and who knows how it impacted their conditioning. But I am thinking it might be an advantage to already know most of your team had it.
 
But maybe that’s the case for tons of teams? This is why I think teams with guards who are experienced in their system will be even more important than they already are most years.

Now you see why people are very high on Texas.
Because they have three players who can play the point.
Coleman has been a starter for three years. Ramey is a junior. Andrew Jones is just more mature than pretty much all of college basketball. Plus he has regained his explosiveness.
 
Now you see why people are very high on Texas.
Because they have three players who can play the point.
Coleman has been a starter for three years. Ramey is a junior. Andrew Jones is just more mature than pretty much all of college basketball. Plus he has regained his explosiveness.
12/6 game with Nova looks to be on the schedule. Probably get a pretty good read on both teams.
 
12/6 game with Nova looks to be on the schedule. Probably get a pretty good read on both teams.

I am pretty sure the BE/Big 12 challenge is still on.
Last time I checked the schedule for Texas it wasn't on there. But that was maybe 10 days ago.
The Maui Invitational will tell a lot early. If Texas can win that it sets up a big game against Villanova.

Nova is a tough matchup because they usually are great on offense and defense.
Gives the guards a tough matchup to control the backcourt.
 
I am pretty sure the BE/Big 12 challenge is still on.
Last time I checked the schedule for Texas it wasn't on there. But that was maybe 10 days ago.
The Maui Invitational will tell a lot early. If Texas can win that it sets up a big game against Villanova.

Nova is a tough matchup because they usually are great on offense and defense.
Gives the guards a tough matchup to control the backcourt.
Was announced on nova's side yesterday. Deep, deep nova team this year. Lots of experience. 4 players on the preseason awards watch list. So, really hopeful this season or some version of it does indeed happen. This team can make some noise.
 
Now you see why people are very high on Texas.
Because they have three players who can play the point.
Coleman has been a starter for three years. Ramey is a junior. Andrew Jones is just more mature than pretty much all of college basketball. Plus he has regained his explosiveness.

Well, I meant guards who had experience in the system and also played in a system that actually produces winning results. Sorry, I should have been more clear.
 
Was announced on nova's side yesterday. Deep, deep nova team this year. Lots of experience. 4 players on the preseason awards watch list. So, really hopeful this season or some version of it does indeed happen. This team can make some noise.

Villanova has the ability to make Texas a jump shooting team and to outrebound them.
When Texas made their change last year they started rebounding better and not be such a perimeter team.
But they at times fall back to that. Did in the last game of the year.

We will see because I think for them they know they have to be aggressive and think they have the players to do so.
 
And neither team is ranked in the top 10 either.

That was separate from the issue...

You said teams with experience in the backcourt should benefit this year.
Then mentioned Illinois and GA Tech

I said that was why some people were high on Texas...

They have 4 guards in their senior and junior year
Actually one of their juniors is a year older than the seniors guards


I truthfully don't care where they have Texas in preseason polls...

This wasn't about where KenPom has them or where Bart Torvik has them.

They have an experienced backcourt who believes they know what to do to win basketball games.

That was what Matt Coleman said at the end of the year.
They had won 5 straight. Went through Tech, OU and WVU...

Then came out and played like complete shit against Oklahoma State.
Was like they reverted back to being the team that didn't know how to win.
Looked like they were trying to get Kai Jones going. He had his best game of the year actually.

We weren't allowed to see their response.
The basketball was pretty much taken out of their hands minutes before they were going to play Tech again..

Looking at their roster before the season...
Anyone who has had the privilege of watching them practice these past couple of weeks will tell you.

The guards are playing like when they won 5 straight.
When Courtney Ramey was aggressive and creating things for Coleman and Andrew Jones
 
It will benefit Texas. UT might be a 9 or 10 seed instead of a 2 seed in the NIT.
 
It will benefit Texas. UT might be a 9 or 10 seed instead of a 2 seed in the NIT.

Exactly.
No matter where they end up it benefits them.

But like I have said. If Shaka knew he has to win he would have hit the transfer portal unless of course he fully trust his players.
Shaka actually believes he had a Sweet 16 team last year.
Reason why he is talking about Final 4 this year.
 
Exactly.
No matter where they end up it benefits them.

But like I have said. If Shaka knew he has to win he would have hit the transfer portal unless of course he fully trust his players.
Shaka actually believes he had a Sweet 16 team last year.
Reason why he is talking about Final 4 this year.

Lol, UT wasn’t even gonna make the Dance last year. How would he have a Sweet 16 team playing in the NIT?
 
  • Like
Reactions: MileHighSpartan
I disagree
Tech's offense had more issues and their defense took a step back.
Don't think they would have won that game.
Texas actually had just gave them their worst home defeat the entire year in Lubbock.

That’s one win. Your NET ranking was in the 70s and KenPom wasn’t much better.
 
Exactly.
No matter where they end up it benefits them.

But like I have said. If Shaka knew he has to win he would have hit the transfer portal unless of course he fully trust his players.
Shaka actually believes he had a Sweet 16 team last year.
Reason why he is talking about Final 4 this year.

How are we supposed to know what he actually believed?

What else is a guy on the hot seat going to say? We were one and done at best?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT