I’m conflicted on this … I don’t like rankings that have Florida Basketball too high for literally a two-year span with a generational player, but also you have to eventually penalize more consistent programs like Illinois or Purdue that haven’t won it all. I think his ranking is probably good.Id give more points to winning national championship, something like 50pts per title. 30 seems a little low considering the runner-up gets 20.
Titles should matter the most, but having excellent stats in other areas should be able to override that metric’s weight. For example, I don’t think there’s an intellectually serious argument for UCLA over Kentucky all-time. It always comes down to some bro repeating “TITLES” like a Pokémon.