Uhhh... K figured that out years and years ago. He literally discussed points per possession when you take twos vs threes like twenty years ago.
He sure has a funny way of showing it considering Duke is 230th out of 350 in % of shots taken from 3 point range lol
http://hoop-math.com/leader_o2018.php
This isn’t the NBA. In CBB, those analytics vary considerably from team to team based on personnel.
He sure has a funny way of showing it considering Duke is 230th out of 350 in % of shots taken from 3 point range lol
http://hoop-math.com/leader_o2018.php
I have a hard time believing that Marshall is in any way ahead of the game. They needed a world of luck yesterday. Their guard was literally jacking up the WORST shots you could take from distance. A ton of heat-check variety 28-30 footers.
That’s not due to some coach being ahead of the game lol.
Puts in perspective a coach who can win a P5 conference title running his O thru the nation’s FG % leader and then win the conference tournament without him.I mean we used to be a volume 3 team and we never earned higher than a 6 seed. Since D and rebounding became our staple we have been a much better program. Both good ways to win.
Puts in perspective a coach who can win a P5 conference title running his O thru the nation’s FG % leader and then win the conference tournament without him.
Yep. Amazingly versatile, isn’t he?Kansas won the big12 tournament jacking a ton of 3s off dribble penetration. Their offense was basically unguardable doing exactly what Dantoni described here.
This isn’t the NBA. In CBB, those analytics vary considerably from team to team based on personnel.
A corner 3 is not your best shot, if you have no good shooters.
A post-up is not your worst option if you have a 7-footer shooting 70%.
That’s a different argument. He was talking in absolutes, as if all rosters are roughly equal.What's easier to recruit, a dominant 7-footer or some good 3 point shooters? Especially if you're marshall