ACC vs Big Ten Challenge predictions

[tw3301]

We should start an ACC in season thread so we can jerk each other off all year. Oh wait...

 

[Fighter of the Nightman]

We should start an ACC in season thread so we can jerk each other off all year. Oh wait...

I’m sure you would if you had enough fan bases…

 

[tw3301]

I’m sure you would if you had enough fan bases…

 

[Fighter of the Nightman]

🤷🏼‍♂️😂 … 🍻

 

[boilerzz]

We should start an ACC in season thread so we can jerk each other off all year. Oh wait...

You need to read only a page of the B1G thread to know it’s not even close to a circle jerk.

 

[Quavarius]

It's kind of crazy how cyclical the Big Ten/ACC Challenge got. ACC absolutely dominated from 1999-00 until 2009-10, then the Big Ten either won or tied every year from 2009-10 to 2016-17. Then kind of a mix since.

1999-00: ACC 5-4
2000-01: ACC 5-4
2001-02: ACC 5-3
2002-03: ACC 5-4
2003-04: ACC 7-2
2004-05: ACC 7-2
2005-06: ACC 6-5
2006-07: ACC 8-3
2007-08: ACC 8-3
2008-09: ACC 6-5
2009-10: Big Ten 6-5
2010-11: Big Ten 6-5
2011-12: Big Ten 8-4
2012-13: Tied 6-6
2013-14: Tied 6-6
2014-15: Big Ten 8-6
2015-16: Big Ten 8-6
2016-17: ACC 9-5

2017-18: ACC 11-3​

2018-19: Tied 7-7
2019-20: Big Ten 8-6
2020-21: Big Ten 7-5
2021-22: Big Ten 8-6
2022-23: ACC 8-6

Dayum 😳

 

[dukedevilz]

Stolen from Reddit....overall records in ACC/B1G challenge

1. Duke ... 20-4 (.8333)
2. Wake Forest ... 14-6 (.7000)
3. Virginia ... 14-8 (.6364)
4. Miami ... 10-6 (.6250)
5. Purdue ... 13-9 (.5909)
6. Clemson ... 13-10 (.5652)
7. Pittsburgh ... 5-4 (.5556)
8. Maryland ... 12-12 (.5000) *10-5 versus B1G, 2-7 versus ACC*
9. Wisconsin ... 12-12 (.5000)
10. Minnesota ... 12-12 (.5000)
11. Penn State ... 11-11 (.5000)
12. Boston College ... 7-7 (.5000)
13. Nebraksa ... 6-6 (.5000)
14. Notre Dame ... 5-5 (.5000)
15. Illinois ... 11-13 (.4583)
16. North Carolina ... 11-13 (.4583)
17. Iowa ... 10-12 (.4545)
18. Ohio State ... 10-12 (.4545)
19. Louisville ... 4-5 (.4444)
20. Rutgers ... 4-5 (.4444)
21. Virginia Tech ... 7-9 (.4375)
22. NC State ... 9-12 (.4286)
23. Florida State ... 10-14 (.4167)
24. Northwestern ... 10-14 (.4167)
25. Indiana ... 9-13 (.4091)
26. Georgia Tech ... 9-13 (.4091)
27. Michigan State ... 9-13 (.4091)
28. Syracuse ... 4-6 (.4000)
29. Michigan ... 8-13 (.3810)

ACC: 152 wins (.5448)

Big Ten: 127 wins (.4552)

Maryland won 2/3 of their gams while in the ACC, yet only 2-7 in their time as a B1G team lol.

How did Northwestern or Minnesota never get skipped? Only other B1G teams that played every year were Wisconsin and Illinois.

Duke's 20-4 record is actually quite stunning, because we're consistently playing against a top 5 Big Ten opponent. 10-1 at home, 6-3 on the road, and 4-0 on neutral courts. That lone home loss came against Illinois two years ago when we didn't have a crowd.

 

[IUfanBorden]

Challenge is about match-ups-----Its not even close to a measuring stick to who's the better conference...

Only two surprises was MSU/ND, and Wisky/WF----Other than that, pretty much went as thought.

I mean Duke, a co-favorite to win the ACC, struggled at home with a middle of the pack OSU team....COngrats on winning that one, Dukies...

UNC, league favorite, was boat raced by Indiana....
UVA picked 3rd, randed 3rd, barely won @ UM, by 2....
SU smashed by Illinois...

Sure the B10 had its ****-ups-----Wisky losing to gukin Wake at home was a shocker. MSU losing at ND not a huge surprise---but how they did, oh yeah...

And look, losing to fuking Nebraska should be an automatic disqualification....Auto---Matic.

 

[tw3301]

Challenge is about match-ups-----Its not even close to a measuring stick to who's the better conference...

Only two surprises was MSU/ND, and Wisky/WF----Other than that, pretty much went as thought.

I mean Duke, a co-favorite to win the ACC, struggled at home with a middle of the pack OSU team....COngrats on winning that one, Dukies...

UNC, league favorite, was boat raced by Indiana....
UVA picked 3rd, randed 3rd, barely won @ UM, by 2....
SU smashed by Illinois...

Sure the B10 had its ****-ups-----Wisky losing to gukin Wake at home was a shocker. MSU losing at ND not a huge surprise---but how they did, oh yeah...

And look, losing to fuking Nebraska should be an automatic disqualification....Auto---Matic.

If it were about who has the better conference we would just need to look at national championships over the last 20 years or so and the answer would be obvious. One conference has a lot of decent, middle of the pack teams, that obsess over regular season games and conference championships because that's the height of achievement for them. The other hangs banners.

 

[bMORE607]

It's kind of crazy how cyclical the Big Ten/ACC Challenge got. ACC absolutely dominated from 1999-00 until 2009-10, then the Big Ten either won or tied every year from 2009-10 to 2016-17. Then kind of a mix since.

1999-00: ACC 5-4
2000-01: ACC 5-4
2001-02: ACC 5-3
2002-03: ACC 5-4
2003-04: ACC 7-2
2004-05: ACC 7-2
2005-06: ACC 6-5
2006-07: ACC 8-3
2007-08: ACC 8-3
2008-09: ACC 6-5
2009-10: Big Ten 6-5
2010-11: Big Ten 6-5
2011-12: Big Ten 8-4
2012-13: Tied 6-6
2013-14: Tied 6-6
2014-15: Big Ten 8-6
2015-16: Big Ten 8-6
2016-17: ACC 9-5
2017-18: ACC 11-3
2018-19: Tied 7-7
2019-20: Big Ten 8-6
2020-21: Big Ten 7-5
2021-22: Big Ten 8-6
2022-23: ACC 8-6

fairly even outside of 3 years. Woof at 2017-2018

 

[1016CC0503]

If it were about who has the better conference we would just need to look at national championships over the last 20 years or so and the answer would be obvious. One conference has a lot of decent, middle of the pack teams, that obsess over regular season games and conference championships because that's the height of achievement for them. The other hangs banners.

Yes, the way to judge an entire conference is by the best singular team😂😂

Clearly you didn’t get a Duke education, unless they’ve adopted UNC class style

 

[Fighter of the Nightman]

If it were about who has the better conference we would just need to look at national championships over the last 20 years or so and the answer would be obvious. One conference has a lot of decent, middle of the pack teams, that obsess over regular season games and conference championships because that's the height of achievement for them. The other hangs banners.

That is actually pretty ridiculous. A class of one kid who has an A+ and nine kids who have Cs to Fs is not a better class overall than a class with three kids with an A-, five with a B and one with a C, lol.

 

[IUfanBorden]

If it were about who has the better conference we would just need to look at national championships over the last 20 years or so and the answer would be obvious. One conference has a lot of decent, middle of the pack teams, that obsess over regular season games and conference championships because that's the height of achievement for them. The other hangs banners.

If you truly believe this, than you are just stupid, TBH....A team winning a natty doesn't equal best conference. It's just a very dumb and lazy argument.

 

[tw3301]

Big 10 sucks.

 

[lurkeraspect84]

Big 10 sucks.

for a while now.

 

[tw3301]

for a while now.

Like 20 years, embarrassing.