I think most would argue that Auburn has had the best season and that would be really hard to dispute. But from an efficiency perspective, who has the greatest efficiency difference since the calendar turned to January? Fortunately, Torvik allows us to run that. I like to do this leading into the tournament using the prior 6 weeks to look for underseeded teams and it frequently helps with my bracket picks.
Below is the 2025 calendar YTD top 20 as of this morning. A few thoughts:
Below is the 2025 calendar YTD top 20 as of this morning. A few thoughts:
- The metrics just love Houston
- Tennessee's offense was good early in the season but is reverting back to the pre-Knecht era numbers
- Damn St Johns defense is elite, but that offense will make it hard to count on them in the tourney
- Kansas and Iowa State are doing their best impressions of Tennessee lately and that's why they've had some bumpy rides of late
- I thought Auburn's D was impacted by Broome's absence but they were good on D in those games. They've not been great since he's been back (outside of that disgusting Tennessee game)
- Biggest surprises to the good - Missouri and St Mary's.
- Biggest surprises to the bad - Texas A&M (23) and Michigan (32) are outside the top 20
- Conference breakdown - SEC/B1G/B12 all with 5, BE/ACC with 2, WCC with 1
Rk | Team | Conf | G | Rec | AdjOE | Rank | AdjDE | Rank | Barthag | WAB | Rank |
1 | Houston | B12 | 11 | 10–1 | 127.9 | 3 | 89.4 | 5 | 0.9839 | 4.4 | 4 |
2 | Purdue | B10 | 11 | 10–1 | 126.1 | 6 | 91.9 | 10 | 0.9744 | 4 | 6 |
3 | Duke | ACC | 10 | 9–1 | 126.4 | 5 | 93.4 | 15 | 0.9702 | 2.5 | 18 |
4 | Auburn | SEC | 10 | 9–1 | 127.2 | 4 | 94.1 | 19 | 0.9697 | 5 | 2 |
5 | Florida | SEC | 10 | 7–3 | 125.4 | 8 | 94 | 18 | 0.965 | 3.3 | 10 |
6 | Texas Tech | B12 | 11 | 9–2 | 124.1 | 10 | 93.1 | 14 | 0.9645 | 4.5 | 3 |
7 | Saint Mary's | WCC | 11 | 10–1 | 119.2 | 27 | 89.5 | 6 | 0.9641 | 2.6 | 17 |
8 | Missouri | SEC | 10 | 6–4 | 126 | 7 | 94.7 | 23 | 0.9637 | 2.3 | 20 |
9 | Alabama | SEC | 10 | 9–1 | 128.3 | 2 | 96.7 | 35 | 0.9629 | 4.4 | 5 |
10 | Wisconsin | B10 | 11 | 9–2 | 124.8 | 9 | 94.1 | 20 | 0.9626 | 3.6 | 8 |
11 | Arizona | B12 | 11 | 10–1 | 122.3 | 15 | 93 | 13 | 0.9589 | 5.2 | 1 |
12 | Tennessee | SEC | 11 | 7–4 | 114 | 69 | 87.1 | 2 | 0.9567 | 3 | 12 |
13 | Louisville | ACC | 11 | 10–1 | 120.8 | 18 | 92.7 | 12 | 0.9545 | 2.8 | 15 |
14 | Kansas | B12 | 11 | 7–4 | 116 | 52 | 89.1 | 4 | 0.9543 | 2.4 | 19 |
15 | Michigan St. | B10 | 10 | 8–2 | 118.6 | 29 | 91.5 | 8 | 0.9515 | 2.9 | 14 |
16 | Iowa St. | B12 | 11 | 7–4 | 115.2 | 60 | 90 | 7 | 0.9442 | 2.1 | 22 |
17 | St. John's | BE | 10 | 10–0 | 106 | 186 | 83.4 | 1 | 0.9403 | 3.7 | 7 |
18 | Illinois | B10 | 12 | 7–5 | 122.3 | 14 | 96.7 | 36 | 0.9372 | 1.1 | 35 |
19 | Creighton | BE | 10 | 9–1 | 117.6 | 40 | 93.8 | 16 | 0.9308 | 3.5 | 9 |
20 | UCLA | B10 | 11 | 7–4 | 120 | 22 | 95.8 | 27 | 0.9303 | 1.8 | 26 |