They keep winning but I feel like no one has talked about them at all. Would think they should be a solid 2 seed as of right now in the tourney. Up 2 games in the Big East. Blowout losses to uva and Marquette.
They are on track for a 2 seed right now. Won’t be a 4They'll be a 4 seed in Auburn's bracket and beat them in the sweet sixteen.
They play Villanova this week. Win that game and they probably lock the big east upOne of the more interesting resumes that I can ever remember. All they do is win... but usually not by very much. They're 9-0 in games decided by 5 points or less. 13-0 in games decided by 10 points or less.
The metrics hate Providence (47th in KenPom). They win close games, and have been blown out in both of their losses. Watson is the leader of the team. Bynum, Durham, and Horchler all play well. But, no bonafide superstars on this team. I think people get hesitant about Providence because they don't strike you as a Final Four team. They look like a good team, someone that might be a capable of winning a game or two in the tournament. But, most people don't think they'll go very far in March. And most don't think they're better than Villanova.
Only stat that really matters, though, is they're 21-2. If they keep winning, they could legitimately earn a 1 seed. Crazy thing about PC is, they have never won a regular season conference championship. They currently have two less conference losses than Villanova. Could be an exciting finish in the Big East down the home stretch.
You think they're on track for a 2 because they're ranked 8th?They are on track for a 2 seed right now. Won’t be a 4
They are closer to a 2 right now than a 4 and pretty much all mock brackets agree with me on thisYou think they're on track for a 2 because they're ranked 8th?
They are currently tied with 2008 Wagner (which went 23-8 and was KenPom #228 with an AdjO of 87.1 and AdjD of 103.6). Both teams are miles ahead of anyone else in the KenPom era.I think I saw a stat that says they have the best luck rating in Kenpom history. Take that for what it's worth. They looked awful against us. Also, take that for what it's worth.
I've seen them as a 4 more times than not. I think I saw them as a 3 in 1 bracket.They are closer to a 2 right now than a 4 and pretty much all mock brackets agree with me on this
They are closer to a 2 right now than a 4 and pretty much all mock brackets agree with me on this
I've seen them as a 4 more times than not. I think I saw them as a 3 in 1 bracket.
For them to get a 2, they better not lose on the way out, their metric numbers are not 2 seed worthy.
Metric nerds are approaching douche levels of the baseball writers of America. Just two terrible groups of people