It was definitely a part of it. Not saying they didn't deserve it with the great wins, but lets be honest swap the UK name with Florida and we're NOT a 3 seed lmao. Shoot give UK our resume and they are in a much deeper debate with the other 1 seeds. It is what it is.Do you think blue blood got y'all a 3 seed over a 4 seed?
Ok, JC's suit has some stripes, and I don't see stripes on sleeves hugging. So where are his hands?All I ask for this weekend, is a hug in Providence from a couple of best friends. I ask for so little.
![]()
27-7Funny watching you UK'ers justify UL seed.
If UK was 27-6..finished 2nd in conference..played in conference championship game..Was ranked 10th. 23rd in NET....23rd Torvik..23 KO...SOS 10..
Amd got an 8 seed? Jfc..NCAA headquarters would look like Libya..
This is the Selection Sunday thread, sir. You may see yourself out.Funny watching you UK'ers justify UL seed.
If UK was 27-6..finished 2nd in conference..played in conference championship game..Was ranked 10th. 23rd in NET....23rd Torvik..23 KO...SOS 10..
Amd got an 8 seed? Jfc..NCAA headquarters would look like Libya..
Funny watching you UK'ers justify UL seed.
If UK was 27-6..finished 2nd in conference..played in conference championship game..Was ranked 10th. 23rd in NET....23rd Torvik..23 KO...SOS 10..
Amd got an 8 seed? Jfc..NCAA headquarters would look like Libya..
Funny watching you UK'ers justify UL seed.
If UK was 27-6..finished 2nd in conference..played in conference championship game..Was ranked 10th. 23rd in NET....23rd Torvik..23 KO...SOS 10..
Amd got an 8 seed? Jfc..NCAA headquarters would look like Libya..
If you have players missing going into dance shouldn’t that hurt you instead of helping you?No, sweeping Tennessee, beating duke, beating florida and winning at Gonzaga, got UK a 3 seed.
SOS is top 5 and I know you hate this one, but injuries were considered. Ole Bubba said a week ago that our injuries would be taken into consideration.
At least Butler is back, you might maybe take a look at Iowa State. They have a key injury that is permanent, they don't have the wins UK has and they also got a 3.
Iowa State also has a loss to Oklahoma state (quad 3), wva (not in the tournament) and a loss to KSU by 19 at home. So if you have an issue with UK on the 3 line, certainly you have an issue with Iowa State… right?
I agree and congrats on beating us yesterday. Y’all have a great team, good luck going forward.It was definitely a part of it. Not saying they didn't deserve it with the great wins, but lets be honest swap the UK name with Florida and we're NOT a 3 seed lmao. Shoot give UK our resume and they are in a much deeper debate with the other 1 seeds. It is what it is.
The man is trying to keep the red birds down.Louisville vs the 6 seeds:
![]()
Ok, JC's suit has some stripes, and I don't see stripes on sleeves hugging. So where are his hands?
🤣
Woah woah woah, Borden. Way too much logic here.Funny watching you UK'ers justify UL seed.
If UK was 27-6..finished 2nd in conference..played in conference championship game..Was ranked 10th. 23rd in NET....23rd Torvik..23 KO...SOS 10..
Amd got an 8 seed? Jfc..NCAA headquarters would look like Libya..
I thought a 6 seed would be the case, but a 5 should be what we got. An 8 showcases just how ruhtarded and biased the NCAA truly is.Tbf most UK fans have said UL got way underseeded. It's just JC justifying it but that's expected. Now UK fans are definitely laughing about it because it's hilarious. But yeah UL got screwed over hard. They deserved a 5 or 6 imo.
Bias? Who is biased? I could definitely see the argument vs Memphis, which was clearly seeded too high. But in that case, I'm giving the 5 to Illinois, Missouri, or Ole Miss before I'm giving it to Louisville.I thought a 6 seed would be the case, but a 5 should be what we got. An 8 showcases just how ruhtarded and biased the NCAA truly is.
Is your butt still hurt from Brohm leaving to go to a better program? The only tards justifying this seeding are you and a handful of cayut fans who hate us. Makes ya wonder?Bias? Who is biased?
Louisville vs the 5 seeds:
![]()
Idgaf what you are seeded. But it's comical that you are trying to justify being wronged by citing rankings (completely irrelevant) and conference finish (also completely irrelevant). Is this your first time following the bracketing process?Is your butt still hurt from Brohm leaving to go to a better program? The only tards justifying this seeding are you and a handful of cayut fans who hate us. Makes ya wonder?
Florida got a 1 seed, but you're saying somehow they would have gotten a better seed if they're name was UK??? How?It was definitely a part of it. Not saying they didn't deserve it with the great wins, but lets be honest swap the UK name with Florida and we're NOT a 3 seed lmao. Shoot give UK our resume and they are in a much deeper debate with the other 1 seeds. It is what it is.
Dude, we are way underseeded. It's not that hard to realize. What's comical is you saying you don't care, when you clearly do.Idgaf what you are seeded. But it's comical that you are trying to justify being wronged by citing rankings (completely irrelevant) and conference finish (also completely irrelevant). Is this your first time following the bracketing process?
Take a look at the comparisons I posted and make your case based on the relevant data.Dude, we are way underseeded. It's not that hard to realize.
Louisville should have 100% been a 6 or 7.Funny watching you UK'ers justify UL seed.
If UK was 27-6..finished 2nd in conference..played in conference championship game..Was ranked 10th. 23rd in NET....23rd Torvik..23 KO...SOS 10..
Amd got an 8 seed? Jfc..NCAA headquarters would look like Libya..
They're really not that different, which is the funny part. You're grasping at straws it seems.Take a look at the comparisons I posted and make your case based on the relevant data.
Louisville would kick Purdue’s ass all over the court.Bias? Who is biased? I could definitely see the argument vs Memphis, which was clearly seeded too high. But in that case, I'm giving the 5 to Illinois, Missouri, or Ole Miss before I'm giving it to Louisville.
Louisville vs the 5 seeds:
![]()
Comparison of the teams that got a 7 seed vs Louisville. When you look at it like this, it's hard to justify being extremely angry IMO.
![]()
Missing? Butler is playing.If you have players missing going into dance shouldn’t that hurt you instead of helping you?
So if they're not that different, how can you empirically say that Louisville got fvcked?They're really not that different, which is the funny part. You're grasping at straws it seems.
Because we did. Now justify to me why Clemson got a 5 when we beat the head to head twice and had a very similar record outside of victory over Duke?So if they're not that different, how can you empirically say that Louisville got fvcked?
Head to head isn't a metric that is used. There are things in favor of both. I'm not in the room to see which the committee uses to prioritize. I actually wish they'd be more transparent but they aren't. But I'm guessing the fact that Clemson has 2 Q1A wins and Louisville had zero played a large factor.Because we did. Now justify to me why Clemson got a 5 when we beat the head to head twice and had a very similar record outside of victory over Duke?
You saying bracketologists don't see the brands when they are projecting? Cmon man. What's the math for Duke then? The predictive analytics? Or was it Resume? They can pick and choose if they want to.Florida got a 1 seed, but you're saying somehow they would have gotten a better seed if they're name was UK??? How?
Everyone had UK as a 3 before selection Sunday and it's because UK's SOS and wins. Lunardi isn’t projecting based on name, he does it baded on resume and math.
If UK should have been a 4, what team on the 4 line should have gotten the 3?
Only thing I can think.of is they beat duke and UK. That’s it, that’s all I got.Because we did. Now justify to me why Clemson got a 5 when we beat the head to head twice and had a very similar record outside of victory over Duke?
And Q1A wins, which they both are, seem to be given a lot of weight.Only thing I can think.of is they beat duke and UK. That’s it, that’s all I got.
Are you at full strength then?Missing? Butler is playing.
Jaxson was missing for several of UK's big wins, including the second win over Tennessee and the win @ Missouri.
What do you mean duke? Are you saying duke shouldn't be a 1?You saying bracketologists don't see the brands when they are projecting? Cmon man. What's the math for Duke then? The predictive analytics? Or was it Resume?
We’re as good as we have been in months. Yes, we are down Robinson and Kriisa, but we have wins over Tennessee, @ Oklahoma and @ Missouri without him.Are you at full strength then?