Selection Sunday thread
- Thread starter Kevin Bryan
- Start date
It was definitely a part of it. Not saying they didn't deserve it with the great wins, but lets be honest swap the UK name with Florida and we're NOT a 3 seed lmao. Shoot give UK our resume and they are in a much deeper debate with the other 1 seeds. It is what it is.
All I ask for this weekend, is a hug in Providence from a couple of best friends. I ask for so little.
Ok, JC's suit has some stripes, and I don't see stripes on sleeves hugging. So where are his hands?All I ask for this weekend, is a hug in Providence from a couple of best friends. I ask for so little.
🤣
27-7
2nd in a conference that only finished ahead of the Mountain West because Duke is in it
Rankings don't matter
Negative OOC WAB and then played in a weak conference
4-6 in Q1 with 0 Q1A wins
I think they should have been a 7 but it's really not that shocking that they are an 8.
This is the Selection Sunday thread, sir. You may see yourself out.
Tbf most UK fans have said UL got way underseeded. It's just JC justifying it but that's expected. Now UK fans are definitely laughing about it because it's hilarious. But yeah UL got screwed over hard. They deserved a 5 or 6 imo.
If you have players missing going into dance shouldn’t that hurt you instead of helping you?
I agree and congrats on beating us yesterday. Y’all have a great team, good luck going forward.
The man is trying to keep the red birds down.Louisville vs the 6 seeds:
I thought a 6 seed would be the case, but a 5 should be what we got. An 8 showcases just how ruhtarded and biased the NCAA truly is.
Bias? Who is biased? I could definitely see the argument vs Memphis, which was clearly seeded too high. But in that case, I'm giving the 5 to Illinois, Missouri, or Ole Miss before I'm giving it to Louisville.
Louisville vs the 5 seeds:
Is your butt still hurt from Brohm leaving to go to a better program? The only tards justifying this seeding are you and a handful of cayut fans who hate us. Makes ya wonder?Bias? Who is biased?
Louisville vs the 5 seeds:
Idgaf what you are seeded. But it's comical that you are trying to justify being wronged by citing rankings (completely irrelevant) and conference finish (also completely irrelevant). Is this your first time following the bracketing process?
Florida got a 1 seed, but you're saying somehow they would have gotten a better seed if they're name was UK??? How?
Everyone had UK as a 3 before selection Sunday and it's because UK's SOS and wins. Lunardi isn’t projecting based on name, he does it baded on resume and math.
If UK should have been a 4, what team on the 4 line should have gotten the 3?
Dude, we are way underseeded. It's not that hard to realize. What's comical is you saying you don't care, when you clearly do.
I was going to say, there’s been like one UK fan saying U of L got what they deserved. The rest of us said it was a screw job.
I don’t like Louisville fans being salty about their 8 and saying we didn’t earn a three.
I don’t like Louisville fans being salty about their 8 and saying we didn’t earn a three.
Take a look at the comparisons I posted and make your case based on the relevant data.
Louisville should have 100% been a 6 or 7.
But they have 7 losses and not very many good wins.
Still, I would have had them at a 6.
They're really not that different, which is the funny part. You're grasping at straws it seems.
Louisville would kick Purdue’s ass all over the court.Bias? Who is biased? I could definitely see the argument vs Memphis, which was clearly seeded too high. But in that case, I'm giving the 5 to Illinois, Missouri, or Ole Miss before I'm giving it to Louisville.
Louisville vs the 5 seeds:
Comparison of the teams that got a 7 seed vs Louisville. When you look at it like this, it's hard to justify being extremely angry IMO.
Missing? Butler is playing.
Jaxson was missing for several of UK's big wins, including the second win over Tennessee and the win @ Missouri.
So if they're not that different, how can you empirically say that Louisville got fvcked?
Because we did. Now justify to me why Clemson got a 5 when we beat the head to head twice and had a very similar record outside of victory over Duke?
Head to head isn't a metric that is used. There are things in favor of both. I'm not in the room to see which the committee uses to prioritize. I actually wish they'd be more transparent but they aren't. But I'm guessing the fact that Clemson has 2 Q1A wins and Louisville had zero played a large factor.
Well, I did think UofL should have been a 6, but after seeing Boilerzz's posts, I'm thinking they should be out of not only this tournament, but the next three.
Boilerzz should be a defense attorney. Bubba is not guilty, your honor.
Boilerzz should be a defense attorney. Bubba is not guilty, your honor.
You saying bracketologists don't see the brands when they are projecting? Cmon man. What's the math for Duke then? The predictive analytics? Or was it Resume? They can pick and choose if they want to.
Only thing I can think.of is they beat duke and UK. That’s it, that’s all I got.
And Q1A wins, which they both are, seem to be given a lot of weight.
What do you mean duke? Are you saying duke shouldn't be a 1?
What am I missing here? Are you serious?
Who should get the 1 over duke?
Who should get the 3 over UK?
I guess I would agree with you if every bracket projection didn’t have UK as a 3 prior to the reveal.
But you're losing me on the duke thing man, they are a 1 any way you slice it.
We’re as good as we have been in months. Yes, we are down Robinson and Kriisa, but we have wins over Tennessee, @ Oklahoma and @ Missouri without him.
Similar threads
