ADVERTISEMENT

Selection Sunday thread

Idc Whatever GIF
Apparently rhat $100k bonus was important
 
Do you think blue blood got y'all a 3 seed over a 4 seed?
It was definitely a part of it. Not saying they didn't deserve it with the great wins, but lets be honest swap the UK name with Florida and we're NOT a 3 seed lmao. Shoot give UK our resume and they are in a much deeper debate with the other 1 seeds. It is what it is.
 
Funny watching you UK'ers justify UL seed.

If UK was 27-6..finished 2nd in conference..played in conference championship game..Was ranked 10th. 23rd in NET....23rd Torvik..23 KO...SOS 10..

Amd got an 8 seed? Jfc..NCAA headquarters would look like Libya..
 
  • Haha
Reactions: UL_1986
Funny watching you UK'ers justify UL seed.

If UK was 27-6..finished 2nd in conference..played in conference championship game..Was ranked 10th. 23rd in NET....23rd Torvik..23 KO...SOS 10..

Amd got an 8 seed? Jfc..NCAA headquarters would look like Libya..
27-7

2nd in a conference that only finished ahead of the Mountain West because Duke is in it

Rankings don't matter

Negative OOC WAB and then played in a weak conference

4-6 in Q1 with 0 Q1A wins

I think they should have been a 7 but it's really not that shocking that they are an 8.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kyjeff1
Funny watching you UK'ers justify UL seed.

If UK was 27-6..finished 2nd in conference..played in conference championship game..Was ranked 10th. 23rd in NET....23rd Torvik..23 KO...SOS 10..

Amd got an 8 seed? Jfc..NCAA headquarters would look like Libya..
This is the Selection Sunday thread, sir. You may see yourself out.
 
Funny watching you UK'ers justify UL seed.

If UK was 27-6..finished 2nd in conference..played in conference championship game..Was ranked 10th. 23rd in NET....23rd Torvik..23 KO...SOS 10..

Amd got an 8 seed? Jfc..NCAA headquarters would look like Libya..

Tbf most UK fans have said UL got way underseeded. It's just JC justifying it but that's expected. Now UK fans are definitely laughing about it because it's hilarious. But yeah UL got screwed over hard. They deserved a 5 or 6 imo.
 
No, sweeping Tennessee, beating duke, beating florida and winning at Gonzaga, got UK a 3 seed.

SOS is top 5 and I know you hate this one, but injuries were considered. Ole Bubba said a week ago that our injuries would be taken into consideration.

At least Butler is back, you might maybe take a look at Iowa State. They have a key injury that is permanent, they don't have the wins UK has and they also got a 3.

Iowa State also has a loss to Oklahoma state (quad 3), wva (not in the tournament) and a loss to KSU by 19 at home. So if you have an issue with UK on the 3 line, certainly you have an issue with Iowa State… right?
If you have players missing going into dance shouldn’t that hurt you instead of helping you?
 
It was definitely a part of it. Not saying they didn't deserve it with the great wins, but lets be honest swap the UK name with Florida and we're NOT a 3 seed lmao. Shoot give UK our resume and they are in a much deeper debate with the other 1 seeds. It is what it is.
I agree and congrats on beating us yesterday. Y’all have a great team, good luck going forward.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 954gator
Comparison of the teams that got a 7 seed vs Louisville. When you look at it like this, it's hard to justify being extremely angry IMO.


GmQ8Id6asAASabl
 
Funny watching you UK'ers justify UL seed.

If UK was 27-6..finished 2nd in conference..played in conference championship game..Was ranked 10th. 23rd in NET....23rd Torvik..23 KO...SOS 10..

Amd got an 8 seed? Jfc..NCAA headquarters would look like Libya..
Woah woah woah, Borden. Way too much logic here.
 
Tbf most UK fans have said UL got way underseeded. It's just JC justifying it but that's expected. Now UK fans are definitely laughing about it because it's hilarious. But yeah UL got screwed over hard. They deserved a 5 or 6 imo.
I thought a 6 seed would be the case, but a 5 should be what we got. An 8 showcases just how ruhtarded and biased the NCAA truly is.
 
I thought a 6 seed would be the case, but a 5 should be what we got. An 8 showcases just how ruhtarded and biased the NCAA truly is.
Bias? Who is biased? I could definitely see the argument vs Memphis, which was clearly seeded too high. But in that case, I'm giving the 5 to Illinois, Missouri, or Ole Miss before I'm giving it to Louisville.

Louisville vs the 5 seeds:

GmRC72NbEAA9EoV
 
Is your butt still hurt from Brohm leaving to go to a better program? The only tards justifying this seeding are you and a handful of cayut fans who hate us. Makes ya wonder?
Idgaf what you are seeded. But it's comical that you are trying to justify being wronged by citing rankings (completely irrelevant) and conference finish (also completely irrelevant). Is this your first time following the bracketing process?
 
It was definitely a part of it. Not saying they didn't deserve it with the great wins, but lets be honest swap the UK name with Florida and we're NOT a 3 seed lmao. Shoot give UK our resume and they are in a much deeper debate with the other 1 seeds. It is what it is.
Florida got a 1 seed, but you're saying somehow they would have gotten a better seed if they're name was UK??? How?

Everyone had UK as a 3 before selection Sunday and it's because UK's SOS and wins. Lunardi isn’t projecting based on name, he does it baded on resume and math.

If UK should have been a 4, what team on the 4 line should have gotten the 3?
 
Idgaf what you are seeded. But it's comical that you are trying to justify being wronged by citing rankings (completely irrelevant) and conference finish (also completely irrelevant). Is this your first time following the bracketing process?
Dude, we are way underseeded. It's not that hard to realize. What's comical is you saying you don't care, when you clearly do.
 
I was going to say, there’s been like one UK fan saying U of L got what they deserved. The rest of us said it was a screw job.

I don’t like Louisville fans being salty about their 8 and saying we didn’t earn a three.
 
Funny watching you UK'ers justify UL seed.

If UK was 27-6..finished 2nd in conference..played in conference championship game..Was ranked 10th. 23rd in NET....23rd Torvik..23 KO...SOS 10..

Amd got an 8 seed? Jfc..NCAA headquarters would look like Libya..
Louisville should have 100% been a 6 or 7.
But they have 7 losses and not very many good wins.

Still, I would have had them at a 6.
 
Bias? Who is biased? I could definitely see the argument vs Memphis, which was clearly seeded too high. But in that case, I'm giving the 5 to Illinois, Missouri, or Ole Miss before I'm giving it to Louisville.

Louisville vs the 5 seeds:

GmRC72NbEAA9EoV
Louisville would kick Purdue’s ass all over the court.
 
  • Love
Reactions: UL_1986
If you have players missing going into dance shouldn’t that hurt you instead of helping you?
Missing? Butler is playing.
Jaxson was missing for several of UK's big wins, including the second win over Tennessee and the win @ Missouri.
 
Because we did. Now justify to me why Clemson got a 5 when we beat the head to head twice and had a very similar record outside of victory over Duke?
Head to head isn't a metric that is used. There are things in favor of both. I'm not in the room to see which the committee uses to prioritize. I actually wish they'd be more transparent but they aren't. But I'm guessing the fact that Clemson has 2 Q1A wins and Louisville had zero played a large factor.
 
Well, I did think UofL should have been a 6, but after seeing Boilerzz's posts, I'm thinking they should be out of not only this tournament, but the next three.

Boilerzz should be a defense attorney. Bubba is not guilty, your honor.
 
Florida got a 1 seed, but you're saying somehow they would have gotten a better seed if they're name was UK??? How?

Everyone had UK as a 3 before selection Sunday and it's because UK's SOS and wins. Lunardi isn’t projecting based on name, he does it baded on resume and math.

If UK should have been a 4, what team on the 4 line should have gotten the 3?
You saying bracketologists don't see the brands when they are projecting? Cmon man. What's the math for Duke then? The predictive analytics? Or was it Resume? They can pick and choose if they want to.
 
Because we did. Now justify to me why Clemson got a 5 when we beat the head to head twice and had a very similar record outside of victory over Duke?
Only thing I can think.of is they beat duke and UK. That’s it, that’s all I got.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UL_1986
Missing? Butler is playing.
Jaxson was missing for several of UK's big wins, including the second win over Tennessee and the win @ Missouri.
Are you at full strength then?
 
You saying bracketologists don't see the brands when they are projecting? Cmon man. What's the math for Duke then? The predictive analytics? Or was it Resume?
What do you mean duke? Are you saying duke shouldn't be a 1?
What am I missing here? Are you serious?
Who should get the 1 over duke?
Who should get the 3 over UK?

I guess I would agree with you if every bracket projection didn’t have UK as a 3 prior to the reveal.

But you're losing me on the duke thing man, they are a 1 any way you slice it.
 
ADVERTISEMENT