Now, does UL's 2015 title count?
I like it.
I like it.
I mean, the term blue blood means old money. Generational money. If the money entirely comes from the current patriarch (or matriarch, this is 2019 after all), then its new money.
New money is not found in blue blood families.
Is it safe to say, Indiana was #1 or #2 at the end of 1990?
Top 3-4 for sure
Nebraska football was maybe the same, or top 5, at the turn of the century. But...20 years changes things.
Now, does UL's 2015 title count?
OP, are you switching side, going from Michigan basketball to MSU basketball?
Top 3-4 for sure
Nebraska football was maybe the same, or top 5, at the turn of the century. But...20 years changes things.
Forgot UCLA. Wow, how the mighty has fallen.
Duke won in 2015. We have already established that they are not yet a blue blood. It will count if a future coach wins a championship but as of now, Duke is no different than a meth addled powerball winner.
Well said
Helms Titles count. Only new money rednecks think that older titles are irrelevant
Well said
Helms Titles count. Only new money rednecks think that older titles are irrelevant
Ehh I can’t get with it.
Modern Era football
Tourney era b-ball
Hard for me to be biased toward that. Even tho I’d love to claim 5. But 3 it is.
I was expecting you to become a MSU fan if they win this year.Its a simple question regarding criteria.
Ehh I can’t get with it.
Modern Era football
Tourney era b-ball
Hard for me to be biased toward that. Even tho I’d love to claim 5. But 3 it is.
I was expecting you to become a MSU fan if they win this year.
So wait, that puts you well short of the 5 minimum.
Ehh I can’t get with it.
Modern Era football
Tourney era b-ball
Hard for me to be biased toward that. Even tho I’d love to claim 5. But 3 it is.
So wait, that puts you well short of the 5 minimum.
He just has white guilt. They count whether or not he chooses to vote for Hillary.
All time 5. 3 in tourney era.
All time 5. 3 in tourney era.
All time 5. 3 in tourney era.
Only poors would differentiate between the 2. You are embarrassing yourself, man.
No it’s being honest. And hungry for a 4th tourney era natty. Which should have happened this decade with the teams we’ve had. That’s what’s embarrassing.
Should Michigan claim leather helmet football natties from the 20’s? No.
Yep, white guilt.
Yep, white guilt.
I blame it on the now negative connotation of allowing the nanny to paddle the child.
No it’s being honest. And hungry for a 4th tourney era natty. Which should have happened this decade with the teams we’ve had. That’s what’s embarrassing.
Should Michigan claim leather helmet football natties from the 20’s? No.
Yep, white guilt.
Final Fours Since 1984-1985
1. Duke: 12
2. UNC: 10
3. Kansas: 9
4. Kentucky: 8
4. MSU: 8
Modern day basketball began when the NCAA expanded this tournament to a field of 64 in 1985. The 3 point line didn't even get implemented uniformly till 1986.
MSU is a top 5 program in modern day college hoops.
Blue blood and modern era doesn't really go hand in hand.
All all time stats, history, tradition, relevance decides blue blood IMO.
Ya so that’s kind of why no one will put Sparty up there. Even with Duke’s 5 natties, UConn has 4. Duke will fall off some without K..
So for me, it’s as follows for top 10:
1) UK
2) UNC
3) KU
4) Duke
5) UCLA
5b) Indiana
6) Louisville
7) Sparty
7b) Nova
8) Syracuse
9) UConn
10) Arizona
Ya so that’s kind of why no one will put Sparty up there. Even with Duke’s 5 natties, UConn has 4. Duke will fall off some without K..
So for me, it’s as follows for top 10:
1) UK
2) UNC
3) KU
4) Duke
5) UCLA
5b) Indiana
6) Louisville
7) Sparty
7b) Nova
8) Syracuse
9) UConn
10) Arizona
Sure they will..
I don’t really mind either way. I only think there are 4 blue bloods with UK, KU, UNC, and Duke. That’s about it. But if MSU gets a third then maybe. It doesn’t really matter though.
You don’t think UCLA is a blue blood?
Just 11 natties since 1960
Three peat of final fours in the 2000’s
Not like they’ve been dead money since 2000.
MSU has been WAY better than UCLA since Izzo took over. Not even close.