They are better analytically than every other bubble team as well.
I know they didn't have a quad 3 loss but figured one loss wasn't that relevant but I see your point. And I actually agree with the tournament team wins but didn't think that was a measure the committee considered since they use the Quad system. I don't consider the injury stuff. If that's the case we can say UNC was a different team once their coach started playing a competent lineup, no? But, I do agree there are always arguments to be made, which actually proves my point that all of the anger and indignation is more posturing by people who dislike UNC than anything else because those people are flat out saying there is no argument to be made for UNC.