I’m assuming you’re referring to KU. Does the fact they won a title as recently as last year matter (playing devil’s advocate here)?One of them ain’t like the others.
I’m assuming you’re referring to KU. Does the fact they won a title as recently as last year matter (playing devil’s advocate here)?
Well there’s something about 5 that beats 4.I’m assuming you’re referring to KU. Does the fact they won a title as recently as last year matter (playing devil’s advocate here)?
One of them ain’t like the others.
My All-Time Table will look like this, when factoring in this season's results:
4. Kansas - 1176
5. Duke - 1152
6. Louisville - 720
7. Indiana - 708
8. UConn - 707
Kansas and Duke are battling for 4th. And Louisville, Indiana, and UConn are battling for 6th. The gap between 5th and 6th is significant.
What was that incident at UVA a few years ago?It’s clear that UConn is a better closer than Duke and KU. Duke and KU are better at luring girls back to their mom’s basement but they don’t use a strong enough chloroform and the girls wake up before they can close the deal. UConn’s chloroform soaked rags are more effective.
Final 4 success rate should be a factor added in as a metric. 5 titles in 6 final 4’snis extreme efficiency that only ucla really matchesElite Eights
Kansas- 25
Duke- 23
Louisville- 14
UConn- 12
Indiana- 11
Final Fours
Duke- 17
Kansas- 16
Louisville- 10
Indiana- 8
UConn- 6
AP Top 10
Duke- 39
Kansas- 33
Indiana- 17
Louisville- 16
UConn- 12
The titles among this group is very similar, but when you factor in the consistency across multiple metrics, Kansas and Duke are clearly a notch above the rest.
Final 4 success rate should be a factor added in as a metric. 5 titles in 6 final 4’snis extreme efficiency that only ucla really matches
that’s apples to oranges and you know it. How many final 4’s has Wyoming and UTEp or Texas western as they were called at the time been to?UTEP and Wyoming are more efficient in the Final Four than UConn.
been to?
Uconn and UCLA get a boost if you look at final 4 success rate for those that have been To at least 5 final 4’s
Naw your metrics make all wins equal which is stupid. A final 4 win should carry far more weight than a round of 32 game or opening round win does. Or even a regular season game. When looking at best the most important games of the season should be weighed heavier. Your still getting your more appearances in the other column as you said so that accounts for the more final 4 appearancesThe whole idea of adding a separate metric for success rate in the Final Four is silly. There's already metrics to account for all of those wins. A sample size of 6 is also much different than 16 or 17. So yes, I saw your silliness and added upon it.
Naw your metrics make all wins equal which is stupid. A final 4 win should carry far more weight than a round of 32 game or opening round win does. Or even a regular season game. When looking at best the most important games of the season should be weighed heavier. Your still getting your more appearances in the other column as you said so that accounts for the more final 4 appearances
Final 4 success rate should be a factor added in as a metric. 5 titles in 6 final 4’snis extreme efficiency that only ucla really matches
Yes.There should also be a negative metric for losing in earlier rounds to lower seeded teams.
Yes.
Which is why auburn isn’t high on the list being talked about here. But yes Kansas’s losses to vcu, bucknell, and northern iowa should hurt themAuburn's failed to play to seed in almost half their tourney appearances and they average like an 8 seed.
Who might be suing Pfizer if he's still alive.Very true. One has the best coach in the game and wins consistently.
Which is why auburn isn’t high on the list being talked about here. But yes Kansas’s losses to vcu, bucknell, and northern iowa should hurt them
Winning when it matters most is most important. Uconn has won titles now in 4 straight decades. You going to still be bragging about regular season titles if uconn gets to 8 and you are still at 4 in the future to?It would make way more sense to penalize teams for losing seasons and missing the tourney completely. But that wouldn’t help your little troll agenda, would it?
A final 4 win should carry far more weight than a round of 32 game or opening round win does.
Winning when it matters most is most important. Uconn has won titles now in 4 straight decades. You going to still be bragging about regular season titles if uconn gets to 8 and you are still at 4 in the future to?
My All-Time Table will look like this, when factoring in this season's results:
4. Kansas - 1176
5. Duke - 1152
6. Louisville - 720
7. Indiana - 708
8. UConn - 707
Kansas and Duke are battling for 4th. And Louisville, Indiana, and UConn are battling for 6th. The gap between 5th and 6th is significant.
I can't believe you waste your time on these dog shit formulas, lol.
They suck and are horrible.
****ing told you….
Good thing a smart guy like devilz is around to set you yokels straight.
Nah, but devilz’ truth bomb has you B1G mad. 🤣 😂So triggered, lol
Go Huskies!!
Nah, but devilz’ truth bomb has you B1G mad. 🤣 😂
Not being a Blue blood has you and your fanbase melting down
You're the reason penis enlargement pills exist. Are you up to a micro yet?So triggered, lol
Go Huskies!!
You're the reason penis enlargement pills exist. Are you up to a micro yet?
You have to be full of crap, or I live in a SMALL world. 🥺penis enlargement pills exist. Are you up to a micro yet?
UConn
8====≠==≠=====≠=====================)
Kansas
8---------------)