ADVERTISEMENT

Auburn is without its starting PG…

Always thought losing your point guard. Hardest position to overcome. We have to play them on the road here in a couple of weeks.
I mean, we have Wendell but it's just not the same without Zep on the court setting the tone on defense. He knows he's getting his rest in the game so he gives more energy than most.
 
I see you avoided the other question
I don't see a question.

If you want a bet, it's going to be after brackets are released. Only a fool like you would make a March Madness bet in the middle of conference play.
 
I don't see a question.

If you want a bet, it's going to be after brackets are released. Only a fool like you would make a March Madness bet in the middle of conference play.
I don’t need to wait on the brackets. But we can wait to make a bet then if you would like
 
So, does history matter now? Or only when it's convenient?
It matters if the coaching staff is the same. What does looking at auburn pre Bruce pearl do at all to say what auburn is now? Kentucky has had multiple good coaches. Is it relevant to look at duke prior to coach K when discussing programs? No
 
What you are looking at is skewed though which makes it not “facts”
Stats aren't fact, but your opinion is. Got it. Seems to be a common theme with your posts. You and sheriff should debate if he ever returns. You two are nearly identical.

Who would've thought a guy that just started watching Auburn basketball 4 years ago would become this board's expert on all things college basketball? Pretty impressive huh guys? We're all just really stupid for disagreeing with 90% of his posts.
 
Stats aren't fact, but your opinion is. Got it. Seems to be a common theme with your posts. You and sheriff should debate if he ever returns. You two are nearly identical.

Who would've thought a guy that just started watching Auburn basketball 4 years ago would become this board's expert on all things college basketball? Pretty impressive huh guys? We're all just really stupid for disagreeing with 90% of his posts.
I have been regularly attending auburn basketball games since the 90s. Had have season tickets since lebo was our coach. Good call although slightly wrong by you…
 
It matters if the coaching staff is the same. What does looking at auburn pre Bruce pearl do at all to say what auburn is now? Kentucky has had multiple good coaches. Is it relevant to look at duke prior to coach K when discussing programs? No

And does it matter if just about all of the players are different?
 
As good as they both are it’s just as likely that both lose early to a mid major. I don’t expect that to happen but they just strike me as the type of teams that you would put to go far and then get burned by.

There are no cupcakes once you get to the 2nd Round. So yes, it wouldn't be a definite. But, if they do find themselves in the same region, I'm probably going to pick them just because I want to see the matchup.

Dating back to the 1985 NCAA Tournament where we first saw 64 teams, there have been 144 teams that were 1 seeds. 100 of them advanced to the Regional Finals. That's 69.4%. Pretty good odds. 2 Seeds are 65/144 (45.1%). So, the odds of a 1 and 2 seed meeting in the Regional Finals is 31.3%. Not great, but obviously better than any other matchup scenario.
 
Stop having tiny penis syndrome with UK and answer the question, tiger. To me, Auburn is significantly better the Arkansas and should win without their starting point guard. However, if you guys lost your starting point guard at Rupp then I would have a hard time feeling like we beat the real Auburn.

See? This isn’t hard auburn fan. No one is going to take away the win if you admit you beat a short handed kentucky team. It’ll be okay i promise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lurkeraspect84
Zep fvcking Jasper...AU is making excuses because of a dude named Zep fvcking Jasper. That's like UK making excuses cause Bryce Hopkins didn't play. shit....
 
  • Like
Reactions: B-Westy
ADVERTISEMENT