There was nothing clear whatsoever about your original post. Verbatim, you say, "Down a combined 25 points at half vs Gonzaga and Duke and then both teams proceed to shoot 1/20 from three with the vast majority being wide open."Clearly, clearly I was talking about the 2nd half. As I just said and proved to you.
I already mentioned Kentucky's shooting. It's not an aberration, that's who they are right now. But, Kentucky was 8/26 (31%) from 3 in the second half in both games [5/17 vs Gonzaga; so they were +15 from three in the second half vs Gonzaga].
Kentucky is now 82nd in the country from the 3 & 8th in the SEC. It looks quite obviously to be the norm.
There is no mention of second half only.
You can perform whatever mental gymnastics you would like to discredit UKs wins (which is exactly what you are doing, regardless of what meaningless caveat you throw in at the end about giving UK "props" for winning the game, as you discredit it the entire post haha).
And again, UK missed wide open 3 after wide open 3 as well, yet you just want to gloss over that by pointing to their last 4 games only. You are being logically inconsistent.