ADVERTISEMENT

Kentucky Resume...

Login to view embedded media
"Analysis
  • Why so poor?: Louisville’s current roster isn’t built for SEC competition. They lack the depth, defense, and road resilience to handle Kentucky’s schedule. Their real-world ACC struggles (e.g., no road wins) amplify this.
  • Bright spots: They might upset a middling SEC team at home and hold their own in some non-conference games, especially the "Louisville vs. Louisville" anomaly.
  • Comparison: Kentucky is likely 20-5 or better with this schedule as of now, highlighting the gap.
Conclusion
If Louisville MBB played Kentucky’s 2024-25 schedule in the SEC, they’d likely finish with a record around 8-23. They’d struggle mightily against elite teams, lose most road games, and only pick up a handful of wins against weaker opponents at home. This aligns with posts on X suggesting a 9-17 record in a similar simulation—close enough to validate the ballpark estimate. Louisville’s rebuilding phase simply doesn’t match the SEC’s intensity or Kentucky’s current caliber."


Complete breakdown.
lol this might be the dumbest thing I’ve read all day. That is saying something currently. 😂
  • Haha
Reactions: lurkeraspect84
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT