Year of the New Bloods.
- Thread starter lurkeraspect84
- Start date
Last time I bet "vs. the field", I wore a Grayson Allen avatar for an offseason.
I think I'd take the field.
What about every team that's won a championship vs every team that hasn't?
What about every team that's won a championship vs every team that hasn't?
EvilMonkeyInTheCloset
Well-Known Member
The nice thing is going to be we won't have to listen to announcers going on about overhyped players or overhyped teams/coaches.
I heard the name Zion so much the other year I wanted to throw up.
I heard the name Zion so much the other year I wanted to throw up.
I read a ESPN headline the other day on twiiter bout how he's lived up to the hype. 🤣
No one could ever live up to that hype, they were just saving face.
I’d take every team that hasn’t. Whose the biggest contender this year that’s won one, Nova? Has Michigan won one before?
I likely would, too.
Still though, to go 15 years or whatever without a new champion and then to have two back to back? I'm at least temped to take the championship group.
This might be the year I take Baylor/Zaga versus the field but probably still take the field.
Those are clearly the two best teams but that is not how college basketball postseason works.
Those are clearly the two best teams but that is not how college basketball postseason works.
You'd take Gonzaga and Baylor? You're probably right, but odds are against you. Vegas gives them a combined 29% chance.
EvilMonkeyInTheCloset
Well-Known Member
I dont like to talk about that anymore.
Similar threads
