Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Then why is ASU in. I think that should say more about ASU than USC. ASU is 8-10 in the PAC-12 and got smoked round 1 in the P12 tourney
Then why is ASU in. I think that should say more about ASU than USC. ASU is 8-10 in the PAC-12 and got smoked round 1 in the P12 tourney
Just kidding, mostly. I think their logic was something to the effect of "at least ASU used to be good. USC never was."
I hate that they got rid of the last 10 game metric that they used to value. They think that a November game is the same as a February game. Not true. Oklahoma shouldnt be in.
I'm with ya. Oklahoma shouldn't have sniffed the tournament, Arizona State shouldn't have gotten in over USC, and Syracuse shouldn't have gotten in over Louisville.
Louisville>USC
As a UK fan, I thought that UL was a lot better choice than Alabama, Arizona State, Notre Dame and a bunch of others.I wasn't really advocating for us to be in, but I do agree.
But what will they do with their fancy Trae Young tracker in the NIT? Dude isn't even a finalist for POY and Espn unzips his pants at every turn (over)I hate that they got rid of the last 10 game metric that they used to value. They think that a November game is the same as a February game. Not true. Oklahoma shouldnt be in.
I did not know that.This is why?
They lost their second best player in their postseason tourney and their best player has decided not to play in the NIT.
Some of you shouldn't even try.
I hate that they got rid of the last 10 game metric that they used to value. They think that a November game is the same as a February game. Not true. Oklahoma shouldnt be in.
It's amazing that no one has been able to put together a dominant streak in the PAC in recent history.
Going 17-16 and finishing 7-11 in SEC play is why USC is not in the tourney
Not sure what the OP is talking about.