Its because they went to a 20 game schedule of conference play. It's to even out how lopsided some of the schedules have been since they expanded again.What's up with Big 10 scheduling? I just noticed the whole conference is about to play 2 conference games starting this weekend then back OOC for 4 games. That's just weird.
ACC is supposed to start conference play next year during the 1st weekend.... that’s really weird.What's up with Big 10 scheduling? I just noticed the whole conference is about to play 2 conference games starting this weekend then back OOC for 4 games. That's just weird.
1st weekend of December? They going to playing everyone twice again?ACC is supposed to start conference play next year during the 1st weekend.... that’s really weird.
Makes sense.Its because they went to a 20 game schedule of conference play. It's to even out how lopsided some of the schedules have been since they expanded again.
First weekend as in early November?ACC is supposed to start conference play next year during the 1st weekend.... that’s really weird.
https://accsports.com/acc-news/acc-...ague-considers-early-season-conference-games/1st weekend of December? They going to playing everyone twice again?
Yeah, I hate it, but it was needed. It's not out of the realm of possibility for 1 team to play the bottom 3 teams home and home, but only have to play the top 3 teams at home.Makes sense.
Sounds like it's just one game for each team. Duke starts the season off with Kansas next year, would be cool (but brutal) to play Kansas, conference game, then a preseason tournament.https://accsports.com/acc-news/acc-...ague-considers-early-season-conference-games/
This says to start the season. Sounds like November
Ya it is just one game. Why not start the ACC season around Christmas time? Seems odd to play one game in November & then wait till January to play another.Sounds like it's just one game for each team. Duke starts the season off with Kansas next year, would be cool (but brutal) to play Kansas, conference game, then a preseason tournament.
IU certainly got a break. Open with Northwestern(home), PSU(away) and Illinois(home). If this team is what some think, IU hsould be(better be) 3-0 heading into Ann Arbor.Yeah, I hate it, but it was needed. It's not out of the realm of possibility for 1 team to play the bottom 3 teams home and home, but only have to play the top 3 teams at home.
I’m still wondering if having 14 of the 15 ACC teams play an early conference game in November could eventually have an effect on the Duke/UNC games in February and March. Would they eventually play one of the games in November because of rotating games from season to season so that every team plays an early conference game. If that were to happen it would suck not having Duke and UNC play both of their games in February and March like it’s always been. The article did mention that Duke could possibly get a bye because of playing in the Champions Classic but would they get the bye every season because of playing in the Champions Classic? If that were to be the case then I expect that there will be a lot of complaining from the rest of the ACC that they have to play an early season conference game but Duke doesn’t.Sounds like it's just one game for each team. Duke starts the season off with Kansas next year, would be cool (but brutal) to play Kansas, conference game, then a preseason tournament.
That is what I would do but I doubt it if they're doing it for ratings (which seems to be the case).Ya it is just one game. Why not start the ACC season around Christmas time? Seems odd to play one game in November & then wait till January to play another.
Also, with 15 teams does Dook get out of it every year because of the champions classic?
They're not ****ing with those games.I’m still wondering if having 14 of the 15 ACC teams play an early conference game in November could eventually have an effect on the Duke/UNC games in February and March. Would they eventually play one of the games in November because of rotating games from season to season so that every team plays an early conference game. If that were to happen it would suck not having Duke and UNC play both of their games in February and March like it’s always been. The article did mention that Duke could possibly get a bye because of playing in the Champions Classic but would they get the bye every season because of playing in the Champions Classic? If that were to be the case then I expect that there will be a lot of complaining from the rest of the ACC that they have to play an early season conference game but Duke doesn’t.
Having an odd number of teams in a conference is dumb. ACC should tell ND to kick rocks since they don't get a piece of that football revenue.I’m still wondering if having 14 of the 15 ACC teams play an early conference game in November could eventually have an effect on the Duke/UNC games in February and March. Would they eventually play one of the games in November because of rotating games from season to season so that every team plays an early conference game. If that were to happen it would suck not having Duke and UNC play both of their games in February and March like it’s always been. The article did mention that Duke could possibly get a bye because of playing in the Champions Classic but would they get the bye every season because of playing in the Champions Classic? If that were to be the case then I expect that there will be a lot of complaining from the rest of the ACC that they have to play an early season conference game but Duke doesn’t.
It's about the student athletes not money.Having an odd number of teams in a conference is dumb. ACC should tell ND to kick rocks since they don't get a piece of that football revenue.
This !!!! Been saying that since they halfway joined.Having an odd number of teams in a conference is dumb. ACC should tell ND to kick rocks since they don't get a piece of that football revenue.
That's what I meant to say. WinkingIt's about the student athletes not money.
I think Michigan is Top 4-5 at this point
I hope not because it would be a shame if one of those games were no longer played in February or MarchThat is what I would do but I doubt it if they're doing it for ratings (which seems to be the case).
They're not ****ing with those games.
Not happening.I hope not because it would be a shame if one of those games were no longer played in February or March
How bout beating mega bemax then maybe a wofford then take a chance at Gonzaga
Villanova beat you guys for the championship last yr Villanova lost to wofford that’s the jokeI don't get the Wofford part of the joke.
Why would I care that Michigan lost a scrimmage overseas?
Villanova beat you guys for the championship last yr Villanova lost to wofford that’s the joke
When?Villanova beat you guys for the championship last yr Villanova lost to wofford that’s the joke
When the offense is clicking like last night I buy that. The offense isn’t going to hum game in and game out so I don’t feel comfortable calling them a top 5 team. The way our defense is playing though, we have a pretty solid floor. Defenses don’t go cold. Top 10-15 and a 2-4 seed.
Villanova beat you guys for the championship last yr Villanova lost to wofford that’s the joke
We shall see friendAnd Michigan would skill **** the shit out of that garbage ass Kentucky team